Select Committee on Environmental Audit Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Green Minister, the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food

A. ROLE OF THE GREEN MINISTER WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT

  1. What are the Green Minister's specific responsibilities and objectives with regard to:

    (a)  considering the environmental impacts of policies and programmes of the Department; and

    (b)  reviewing the Department's management and operations.

  The Green Minister, Mr Rooker, represents the Department in ensuring that the Government's objectives in respect of the Greening Government initiative are implemented. More generally, all the Department's Ministers have a role in promoting both the Government's and the Department's policies for sustainable development.

  In considering the potential and actual impacts of the Department's policies on the environment, Ministers and officials have access to wide range of policy, economic, scientific and technical support provided in-house or by external consultants. The Minister has made clear that he wants the Department to be open, forward-looking, responsive to the needs of consumers and trusted to safeguard above all else the health and well-being of people and the environment.

  Awareness of the environment and sustainable development is generally high in MAFF as was noted in the case studies on MAFF policies in Experience with the "Policy Appraisal and the Environment" initiative[1]. Further action to increase awareness is to be implemented or is under consideration in the following areas: environmental appraisal; indicators and targets; training; and green operations (including procurement). These initiatives are described in later sections of this memorandum.

  2. What are the arrangements within the Department for providing the Green Minister with advice on the environmental impacts of the Department's policies and operations?

      —  What resources are dedicated to supporting the Green Minister in his/her role?

  Branch A of MAFF's Rural and Marine Environment Division (RMED) is responsible for co-ordinating and developing MAFF's policy on sustainable development, including indicators and targets and Greening Government generally. About two thirds of a staff year are available in support of the Green Minister.

  In advising Ministers, RMED consults within the Department as necessary, including other Policy Divisions, Chief Scientist's Group, Economics and Statistics Group and the Farming and Rural Conservation Agency.

  Building the Estate Management Division is primarily responsible for advising the Green Minister on green operations within MAFF and its Agencies and NDPBs. Resources are confined largely to MAFF headquarters staff, approximately half a staff year at Higher Executive Officer level with some limited input from other grades. These staff are supported by part-time designated officers for green housekeeping covering all sites within MAFF and its Agencies.

  3. Does the Green Minister have specific responsibilities to report on the Department's environmental performance, within the Department, within Government as a whole and to Parliament?

  The Annual Departmental Report describes MAFF's environmental policies and performance. This includes details of the Department's records in respect of green housekeeping. The report is published and is publicly accessible through the MAFF Web Site. MAFF also contributed to the Digest of Green Housekeeping in Government Departments published in 1995. Any recommendations by the Committee will be taken into account in the further development of the Green Minister's reporting role.

  4. The description of the individual role of a Green Minister, quoted above, specifies the environmental impact of policies and programmes. What consideration is being given within the Department to policies and programmes in terms of the wider concept of sustainable development and the balance between issues of economy, environment and social equity?

  The Department aims to develop polices in terms of sustainable development, rather than simply environmental considerations, in line with the UK's evolving Sustainable Development Strategy. For example, work on indicators and targets for agriculture is focusing on the sustainability of agricultural activities. The environmental, economic and social dimensions of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) are a major issue for MAFF and a significant determinant of many of MAFF's policies. The Department is committed to making the CAP more sustainable but our analysis of the problems and solutions is not shared by all Member States. Sustainability is also a significant factor in other policy areas such as flood and costal defence.

B. ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY

  5. Does the Department have an environmental strategy? Does it address both the Department's policy responsibilities and its operations? Is it publicly available?

  6. Does the Strategy show explicitly the extent to which the Department is bound by or committed to actions due to international commitment, EC or national law.

  The Minister has given the Department a clear orientation that he wishes it to develop in a more consumer and environment friendly direction. There are a number of building blocks to achieving this. In particular, MAFF has contributed to the preparation of a new Sustainable Development Strategy for the UK (issued for public consultation by the DETR on 4 February). MAFF's aims are also under review as part of the Comprehensive Spending Review and there are plans to issue a consultation document on indicators and targets for sustainable agriculture.

  A large number of MAFF's policies are governed by EU rules, in particular the Common Agricultural and Common Fisheries Policies. Flood and coastal defence is essentially about intervention in the environment. MAFF's Flood and Coastal Defence Strategy, published in 1993, identifies the relevant international and national legislation; more recent guidance has been published on compliance with the EC Habitats Directive.

  In some areas, co-operation with other Departments is essential to achieve policy aims, notably, in the areas of climate change, biodiversity and the marine environment.

  MAFF has had a written Green Housekeeping Strategy since 1993. This includes a policy statement, policy aims and an action plan to address green operations. The document has not been published although the Department has issued a pamphlet outlining its contents which is available to the public on request (copies are enclosed with this memorandum).

  7. What objectives and targets has the Department adopted under:

  The Green Housekeeping Strategy has general objectives to conserve water, encourage recycling, reduce waste, minimise ozone depleting substances and ensure that building construction and improvements take account of environmental factors. A paper recycling target of 24 tonnes at headquarters buildings was exceeded by 13 tonnes.

    (b)  to meet Government-wide environmentally-related targets (in particular in relation to energy efficiency)?

  MAFF has adopted the Government-wide target of a 20 per cent reduction in energy consumption by the year 2000 compared with a base year of 1990-91.

  8. Has the Department set a target for minimising its solid waste, and if so what is that target?

  MAFF has not set a target as such of reducing its solid waste because it has reservations about the practicality and resource implications of such a course. Nevertheless, the Department is committed to encouraging the minimisation and recycling of waste in its operations.

  9. Does the Department have a policy to raise awareness of its environmental strategy, targets and efforts to address the environmental impacts of its policies and programmes:

    (a)  within the Department;

    (b)  amongst Agencies and NDPBs sponsored by the Department; and

    (c)  amongst the public?

  The Department plans to issue a consultation document this spring setting out proposals to establish a set of indicators, accompanied by targets where appropriate, for sustainable agriculture. The main purpose of the indicators and targets will be to provide Ministers and officials with a tool to assess the environmental effects of policies, to appraise policy options and to raise awareness amongst the agriculture industry and the public about the environmental impacts of agricultural activities and the contribution of the sector to sustainable development.

  The indicators will be updated and republished periodically, probably once every three to five years. The consultation document will not focus solely on MAFF policies. It will also reflect the fact that individuals—e.g. farmers, other land managers, NGOs and the public—can play a role in achieving sustainable agriculture. In the longer term, the intention is to produce a summary of this work which is accessible to the general public.

  The indicators and targets are being complemented by further initiatives to enhance awareness of the environment and sustainable development amongst the Department's staff.

  The Green Housekeeping Strategy includes an objective of raising awareness about green operations within the Department and Agencies. NDPBs have been invited to take up the question of greening operations and have ben approached separately about energy efficiency though some NDPBs are very small and operate from MAFF premises.

  MAFF is also active in ensuring that environmental education and training are made available throughout the agricultural and horticultural sector.

  10. Has the Department sought stakeholders' views on its strategy and targets?

  Not specifically, although there is an ongoing process of consultation with organisations representing consumer, trade and other interests on specific issues. The consultation document on indicators and targets for sustainable agriculture will invite comments from all those with a stake in MAFF policies, including the public.

  11. In line with the commitment in the UK Strategy for Sustainable Development (Cm. 2426, page 199) what conclusions has the Department come to of the practicality of developing an environmental management system for their housekeeping activities?

      —  What consideration has been given to introducing a certified environmental management system such as EMAS or ISO 14001?

  Following consultants' recommendations, the Department decided against implementing an environmental management system on cost grounds. Running costs would have been in the region of £½ million (set up) plus ongoing costs of £½ million per year. Given that the Department is primarily office based, it was decided that environmental audits at selected sites where there was greater likelihood of effects on the environment would be a more cost effective approach. A contract for environmental audits at the Department's laboratories (24 sites) is about to be let.

  12. How frequently does the Department review and report on its performance in relation to its strategy? Are such reports publicly available?

  Appropriate details are given in the Departmental Report which is publicly available.

  13. What arrangements has the Department made for the education and training of staff in environmental issues?

  14. What arrangements has the Department made for the education and training of staff in sustainable development issues?

  The Department's staff need to be aware of environmental/sustainable development issues because of the important role which these play in many of the Department's policies. Much of the knowledge required by staff is gained from the extensive range of technical advice to which they have access.

  However, to maintain and increase this knowledge, the Department is taking action to incorporate awareness of environmental/sustainable development issues in its training and development programme. It is being included in the induction training given to new staff, which is in the process of being redesigned and will be relaunced shortly. Guidance is provided in the Ministerial Writing course to ensure that environmental issues are taken into consideration in drafting submissions.

  In the longer term, the Department is considering how best to raise awareness amongst all staff, including the possibility of a programme of seminars. In addition, a programme of training is being designed for officials involved in the formulation of policy to develop a greater understanding of the environmental implications of policy making. This training will support the new instructions and procedures to be introduced—as described elsewhere in this memorandum.

  Environmental scientists often play a role in supporting or training less specialist staff. These are based in a number of units, including the Farming and Rural Conservation Agency, Pesticides Safety Directorate, Central Science Laboratory, Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Veterinary Medicines Directorate and Flood and Coastal Defence with Emergencies Division.

  The pamphlet on greening operations mentioned earlier has been circulated to all staff. In addition, notices, talks, seminars, training courses, newsletters and exhibits feature aspects of greening. Training is given to accommodation staff on general environmental awareness issues.

C. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

  15. Do the Department's aims and objectives incorporate a commitment to sustainable development or the Government's UK Sustainable Development Strategy of 1994?

  MAFF's aims are currently under review in the context of the Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR). In accordance with the terms of reference for the CSR, MAFF is considering how best its programmes and objectives can contribute to the Government's objectives which include environmental protection and the promotion of employment and investment for sustained economic growth.

  The Green Housekeeping Strategy calls for preference to be given to renewable natural resources. For example, it tries to avoid wood from non-sustainable sources in furnishings and building works.

D. THE DEPARTMENT'S IMPACTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT

  16. Please list Departmental policies and programmes which the Department considers to have significant impacts on the environment and/or significant implications for sustainable development.

  Most, if not all, of MAFF's policies have links with land use or marine resources and have significant impacts on the environment or implications for sustainable development.

  European Union policies, particularly the Common Agricultural and Common Fisheries Policies, have a significant role in shaping both the Department's policies and the environmental impacts of these policies. A wide range of other factors also influence Departmental policies, including the policies of other Government Departments and bodies such as the Environment Agency, international conventions, farmer awareness, NGO activity, technological change, market developments and site specific conditions on farms.

  In terms of MAFF's specific programmes on agriculture and the environment, the major one is the package of voluntary incentive schemes (partly funded by the European Union) with specific environmental objectives. These consist of the following schemes in England: Countryside Stewardship, Environmentally Sensitive Areas, Habitat, Moorland, Farm Woodland Premium and Organic Aid. Similar schemes exist in other parts of the UK. The Alternative Crops Unit encourages the development of crops for industry and energy, with a view to producing renewable raw materials. In addition, MAFF will consult shortly on detailed proposals to require environmental assessments where proposals to bring uncultivated land or semi-natural areas into agricultural use are likely to have significant effects on the environment.

  The Department has also set in train two initiatives with potential for environmental benefits. One relates to the requirement for the preparation of water level management plans for relevant Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) which will make a significant contribution to maintaining and improving biodiversity at those sites. The other relates to the preparation of shoreline management plans which allow for a more strategic approach to coastal defence and environmental issues.

  There are monitoring programmes, for example, to assess the environmental impacts of the incentive schemes mentioned above (for example, £8.4 million was spent on monitoring Environmentally Sensitive Areas in the period 1994-95 to 1996-97) and to assess the quality of the marine environment around the UK (currently worth nearly £2 million per year).

  There are also programmes to increase awareness of the environment amongst the farming community. These include measures such as the provision of conservation advice and the publication of various codes of good agricultural practice and other written material on the prevention of pollution.

  The Department's policy programmes are underpinned by an extensive programme of environment-related research and development (about £50 million in 1996-97), much of which is aimed at identifying or quantifying the impacts of human activities, including agriculture, on the terrestrial and marine environment and helping to counter environmental threats. This includes work on farm waste management, nutrient losses, soil protection, measures to safeguard biodiversity, sustainable farming systems, climate change and protection of the marine environment. Research and development is carried out by a wide range of research institutes and private contractors.

  The work of some of MAFF's NDPBs has a high environmental content. For example, the Department provides substantial grant-in-aid (some £17 million per year) to the Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew. Its scientific endeavours and related programmes serve to improve the way in which the environment is managed and help to maintain the place of MAFF and the UK at the global table on biodiversity, conservation and the environment. MAFF is also a major customer of Horticulture Research International (spending some £12 million per year on research and development), much of whose scientific programme is public good in nature, with environmental benefits for instance in relation to work to minimise the use of fertilisers and pesticides.

  17. What impacts, beyond those associated with administrative functions in typical offices, do the Department's operations have on the environment?

  The MAFF estate (including its Agencies) consists of a wide range of laboratories, farms and storage buildings as well as offices. These could give rise to various environmental impacts, depending on the function of the site, e.g. emissions to air, soil and water resulting form energy use, chemicals, animals waste, plant waste, etc.

  Significant environmental impacts are taken into account in decisions relating to the MAFF estate. For example, the direct impact on the environment was considered as part of the project to build the new Central Science Laboratory complex at Sand Hutton near York. Emissions and pollutants from the laboratory have been minimised and discharges are subject to approval by the Environment Agency and Yorkshire Water. Consultancy advice was taken on disposal and a policy developed in a manner fully compliant with legislation and good practice. A further waste compliance audit will be undertaken in 1998. The Central Science Laboratory has a radioactive discharge licence and discharges are fully within the licence consent. A major tree planting exercise (approximately 5,000 trees) and landscaping scheme have helped to improve environmental surroundings following completion of the laboratory.

  18. Has the Department identified environmental liabilities, such as contamination from past activities, for which it is responsible?

  All redundant sites are assessed by the Ministry and, if any past uses have or might have led to contamination, expert advice is sought on the need for remedial works. This has resulted in the decontamination of various research institutes and laboratory sites which have been, or will be, sold with clearance certificates.

  19. Has the Department reviewed the impacts of its policies and operations on the environment and established an environmental effects register? Is the register publicly available?

  20. Has the Department sought stakeholders' views on its review of its impacts on the environment and on the completeness of its environmental effects register?

  Local designated officers for green housekeeping are expected to keep environmental impacts at their sites under review as a matter of routine in liaison with those concerned, e.g., laboratory managers, service providers, accommodation managers, etc. The Green Housekeeping Strategy requires all MAFF establishments (including Agencies) to meet the requirements of environmental legislation and codes of practice (e.g., Waste Management—The Duty of Care, Water Resources Act 1991, Environment Act 1995). Individual sites hold such information as is appropriate to local needs but this is not held in an aggregated form. Asbestos registers are held for all sites where the substance is known to exist.

  There is no register of environmental effects in relation to policies since it is difficult to see what function such a register would have. However, the Department does monitor and evaluate policies and appraise policy options as described elsewhere in this memorandum.

E. POLICY APPRAISAL

  21. Has the Department incorporated environmental appraisal within its appraisals of all its policies and programmes in accordance with the guidance issued by the Department in "Policy Appraisal and the Environment" (1991)—that is, appraising policy options systematically, exploring all impacts (both quantifiable impacts and non-quantifiable), paying special attention to irreversible effects, taking on board both scientific and public opinions? Has the Department summarised its environmental appraisals? Have they been publicly available?

  The Minister has a statutory duty under Section 17 of the Agriculture Act 1986 to balance the economic, environmental and social interests of rural areas in discharging any functions connected with agricultural land. The Food and Environment Protection Act 1985 also give Ministers substantial powers in relation to matters with significant environmental implications such as licensing of dumping at sea and the control of pesticides.

  Instructions were issued in 1991 to disseminate Policy Appraisal and the Environment, in particular to ensure that all significant environmental effects are considered in the policy making process, even if only qualitative assessments are possible. The instructions stress that submissions containing proposals for policy changes which have significant environmental effects should draw Ministers' attention to all such effects—negative as well as positive and consequential as well as intended. The instructions do not contain specific guidance on taking account of scientific and public opinions as these are covered in Policy Appraisal and the Environment itself.

  Specific reports are published or are available on request. However, it is rare for all the relevant information to be published in a single document although consideration is being given to this.

  In addition, where specific needs arise, the Department issues advice on good environmental practice in implementing its policies and programmes. For example, it has published a Code of Practice on Environmental Procedures for Flood Defence Operating Authorities to help these bodies follow good environmental practice when planning and carrying out flood defence works.

  22. In what circumstances does the Department now consider it should undertake environmental appraisal of policies or programmes? What arrangements does the Department have for ensuring this approach is always applied? Are the Department's environmental appraisals made publicly available?

  Environmental appraisal is a feature of much of the Department's work. For example, the assessment of environmental impact is an integral part of pesticide approval and usage policy and of the appraisal of flood and coastal defence capital works. In other areas, appraisals will be carried out where a specific need arises.

  To ensure that all staff are following best practice, the Department plans to issue new internal instructions and procedures so as to:

  The aim is to implement this action plan by early 1999.

  23. What consideration has the Department given to developing appraisal techniques that specifically address sustainable development issues in the balance between economy, environment and social equity?

  The Inter-Departmental Group on Environmental Costs and Benefits, chaired by DETR economists, is considering how to provide Departments with further guidance on the methodological aspects of environmental appraisal.

  MAFF has issued specific guidance on the inclusion of environmental costs and benefits in appraising flood and coastal defence projects for grant aid. A priority scoring system is in use which provides for works to protect designated environmental sites. The selection processes which exist in relation to the Department's Countryside Stewardship and Objective 5b Schemes, both of which require applicants to compete for funding, require an assessment to be made of the environmental impact of a project in order to obtain value for money and to secure environmental and other benefits.

  24. Is the Department appraising the environmental implications of recommendation flowing from its Comprehensive Spending Review?

  All the Department's expenditure programmes are the subject of detailed scrutiny in the context of the Comprehensive Spending Review. Environmental aspects of those programmes are being examined not only in the MAFF spending review but also in the joint MAFF/DETR spending review of Countryside and Rural policy. The reviews are still in progress and final recommendations have not yet been made.

F. GREENING THE DEPARTMENT'S OPERATIONS

  25. What have been the Department's main achievements in greening its operations since 1990?

  Numerous paper and other recycling and waste minimisation schemes are ongoing at MAFF sites. Equipment containing ozone depleting chemicals are replaced as they fall due for renewal. Asbestos registers are in place and regular checks for Legionella are undertaken. Action has been taken to implement the Historic Buildings Conservation Guide for Government Civil Departments and a programme of quadrennial surveys is in place.

  MAFF policy is to attain the best possible BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) targets for all new buildings and major refurbishments. For example, an "excellent" rating was achieved for new offices at Kings Pool, York and at Northallerton and specifications for projects at Crewe, Cambridge and Workington have been designed to a similar standard. Environmental assessments were also commissioned for laboratories at Thirsk and Penrith and they were awarded a "very good" rating. A large number of energy efficiency initiatives have been undertaken such as a new incinerator at the Ministry's Central Veterinary Laboratory feeding waste heat back into the buildings, and modern energy efficiency measures at the Central Science Laboratory, e.g. lighting controls, improved thermal insulation, etc.

  26. Has the Department reflected its environmental strategy in its specification for goods and services?

  MAFF's procurement policy is to seek value for money in accordance with the Government's policy on procurement. Value for money is defined as the optimum combination of whole life cost and quality to meet the users' requirements. This is defined as efficiency—doing things right; effectiveness—doing the right things; and economy—obtaining goods and services in the most cost effective way.

  Account is taken of MAFF's Green Housekeeping Strategy in drawing up specifications for goods and services. Beyond the specification stage, the Government's current policy of not using procurement to achieve policy ends other than value for money limits the extent to which the Department may have recourse to contract compliance on environmental considerations.

  A note by HM Treasury and the DETR on Environmental Issues in Purchasing is in preparation. The further incorporation of environmental consideration in the Department's costing strategies will be reviewed in the light of this guidance. Further, the Department has noted, and welcomes, the Government's intention to set up a Government/industry working group to look at the take up of whole life costing in Government procurement, including the costs and benefits of such an approach.

  In advance of this, MAFF intends in 1998 to:

    (b)  host a Departmental procurement conference at which environmental considerations in procurement will be discussed (involving a number of key Departmental suppliers); and

    (c)  review its disposal procedures for IT equipment.

  27. What contribution did the Department make to the achievement of the Government-wide target of improving energy efficiency in the Government estate by 15 per cent between 1991 and 1996?

  MAFF has reduced energy consumption by 14 per cent on its main estate and by 6 per cent in its laboratories by 1996-97 despite a large increase in the use of IT equipment and changed working practices leading to more intense energy use. It is committed to the target of 20 per cent energy saving by the year 2000.

G. DEPARTMENTAL AGENCIES, NDPBS AND OTHER SPONSORED BODIES

  28. Do the Executive Agencies and NDPBs sponsored by the Department have environmental strategies consistent with the Department's strategy?

  29. Does the Department have arrangements to ensure that the Executive Agencies and NDPBs undertake environmental appraisals of their policies and programmes?

  MAFF Agencies follow essentially the same procedures and practices as core MAFF, including the management of estates, and the intention is to include them in the further actions described earlier to implement the Greening Government initiative.

  The nature of Agencies' arrangements will, however, reflect the extent to which they have environmental responsibilities or functions. Examples include the Farming and Rural Conservation Agency, much of whose effort is devoted to the delivery of agri-environment programmes for MAFF and the Welsh Office. Although it does not have an environmental strategy as such, environmental considerations are to the fore in determining operational and resource policies.

  The NDPBs which MAFF sponsors will also be brought within the action plan. MAFF's arrangements for green operations apply automatically to its Agencies. For example, the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science has established an Environmental Management Policy covering its own operations which is consistent with MAFF's arrangements.

  The Central Science Laboratory is developing a strategy on energy usage where improvements will be identified and capital funding sought. A requirement for energy efficient lighting in plant rooms has already been identified. The Central Science Laboratory has established a "green committee to focus on green issues in general and to ensure that its operations take full account of issues such as recycling.

  The NDPBs which MAFF sponsors have been asked to consider similar steps to the Agencies as appropriate to their individual situations.

  30. How do the Executive Agencies and NDPBs report on their environmental impacts and performance?

  The Department is considering whether to place a specific obligation on Agencies and NDPBs to report their actions on the Greening Government initiative. Agencies already report as required, for example on energy statistics, to MAFF.

  On green housekeeping, the Department expects Agencies and NDPBs to set up their own arrangements and, where they are in separate premises, to monitor their own environmental performance.

  31. Has the Department reflected its environmental strategy in terms and conditions for grants it awards?

  The majority of grants paid by the Department are governed by the rules of the Common Agricultural Policy and there is limited scope to modify the terms and conditions of payments. However, Member States are able, if they so wish, to attach environmental conditions to livestock subsidies and the UK has attached specific conditions to these under which subsidies can be withdrawn in areas where overgrazing occurs. Grants to fruit and vegetable producer organisations require their operational programmes to achieve environmental objectives. Set-aside payments are also subject to respect of environmental conditions.

  Grants are subject to the duty to balance environmental, economic and social interests under Section 17 of the Agriculture Act 1986. More specific conditions apply to the schemes with specific environmental objectives such as Countryside Stewardship, Environmentally Sensitive Areas, Nitrate Sensitive Areas and the Woodland Grant Scheme/Farm Woodland Premium Scheme, all of which are part funded by the European Community but offer considerable scope for nationally devised terms and conditions. Objective 5b programmes, which are part funded by the EC and offer assistance for rural development projects in designated areas, require an ex ante appraisal of their effect on the environment. In addition, the appraisal and scoring system also takes account of environmental impact

  Applicants for fisheries grants are obliged to consult appropriate authorities and abide by their requirements if the project to be granted aided is in any area specially designated for environmental reasons. Where a grant scheme is competitive, higher priority is given to projects which are concerned with protection of the environment. Where necessary, an environmental assessment under the terms of EC Directive 97/11 may be required to accompany the grant application. Grant aid is not given to projects that would harm the environment. In order to conserve scare fish stocks, no grants are available for measures that might increase fishing effort.

  The Department expects the potential impact on habitats and the environment generally to be a key consideration when flood and coastal defence works are being planned, and start from the presumption that natural river and coastal processes should not be disrupted except where life or important man-made or natural assets are at risk. Grant aid is offered only for schemes which are judged to be environmentally acceptable.

February 1998


1   Report to the DETR by KPMG Management Consulting, July 1997. The main references to MAFF are pp. 15, 28, 29 and 32 and Case Studies 4 (Arable Area Payments), 5 (Disposal of Marine Dredging) and 6 (Agricultural Pesticides Approval). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 15 May 1998