SELF-MANAGEMENT
104. Self-management of allotment sites involves
local authorities devolving responsibilities for many of the day-to-day
issues of site management to the allotment society or committee.
The society is made responsible for collecting the rent and retains
some or all of the money collected to fund basic maintenance,
management of vacancies and waiting lists and cultivation control.
105. The vast majority of the evidence we received
on self-management was positive: witnesses from Handsworth, Bromley
and Stroud[173] all
provided stories of reinvigorated allotment societies. Shepperton
Allotment Association wrote that:
"For a good many years,
our site has been run by a committee of plot-holders, under licence
from our council ... We consider that our site is the best site
in our borough simply because it is self-run. We believe that
most allotment sites would benefit from being self-run, where
there are sufficient plot-holders willing to undertake it."[174]
106. There is little doubt that, when successfully
implemented, self-management schemes ensure greater control of
a site by allotment holders and tend to work to the benefit of
the site. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State expressed
support for the practice, noting that "self-management at
that very local level is almost always a good idea."[175]
We believe that self-management fulfills the twin aims of ensuring
greater control of a site by allotment holders and also reducing
a local authority's administrative responsibilities. We recommend
that all local authorities examine the potential for self-management
of their allotment sites.
107. Some witnesses,[176]
including the Department of the Environment, Transport and the
Regions,[177] expressed
some reservations about the legal implications of passing control
of a site to an allotment society. To overcome this, we recommend
that the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
should draw up an appropriate model agreement that can be used
by local authorities formally to devolve responsibilities to allotment
societies. In particular, this should make provision for a local
authority to take back control of a site in exceptional circumstances.
Gardening
Media
108. Allotments currently tend to be neglected by
much of the gardening media. We were, however, encouraged by the
enthusiasm shown by both Bazal, the producers of a number of gardening
programmes, and Catalyst Television, the makers of Gardeners'
World. Catalyst Television wrote that:
"Gardeners' World regularly
makes films about people with allotments. One has been broadcast
earlier this year and there are a further two scheduled for transmission
later this year. It is also our intention to highlight ... the
very serious issue of the yearly loss of allotment land."[178]
However, we were disappointed to hear from Bazal
that:
"... we have in
the past offered broadcasters a series aimed at allotment holders,
but it is generally felt to be too limited an audience."[179]
109. We believe that the gardening media could
play an important role in promoting allotments, particularly ensuring
the widespread adoption of Best Practice. We urge all media companies
to explore the scope for integrating allotment issues into their
magazines and programmes.
145 Ev p44-45 (HC560-II); Ev p47, para 5.2.2 (HC560-ii),
Ev pp33 and 8-11 (HC560-II), Q45, Q45, Ev p44, para 1.1.6 (HC560-ii);
Geoffrey Sherlock [Ev not printed] Back
146
QQ79-81 and Ev p1-3 (HC560-II) Back
147
Q157 Back
148
Q246, Q255 and Q259 Back
149
See recommendation in Paragraph 87 Back
150
See, for example, Q134 and Ev p28 (HC560-II). See also recommendation
in Paragraph 87 Back
151
Ev pp15 and 28 (HC560-II) Back
152
See para 53 Back
153
St Anns Allotment Campaign [Ev not printed] and 'National Survey
of Allotment Gardeners Views in England and Wales', National Society
of Allotment and Leisure Gardeners, October 1993, p30 Back
154
Q181 Back
155
Q177 Back
156
Q134 and Q16 Back
157
Q182 and Ev p57, case study of Reading (HC560-ii) Back
158
Q177 and background papers from the South East Region Allotments
Committee and Dartford Road Allotments Association Back
159
Ev pp1 and 41(HC560-II) Back
160
Ev p57, case study of Reading (HC560-ii) Back
161
See Ev pp19-20 (HC560-i); Ev pp33 and 41 (HC560-II); St Anns Allotment
Campaign [Ev not printed] Back
162
'English Allotments Survey: Report of the Joint Survey of Allotments
in England', National Society of Allotment and Leisure Gardeners
Limited and Anglia Polytechnic University, November 1997, p8 Back
163
See para 16 Back
164
See, for instance, Ev p7 (HC560-II) Back
165
Ev p24 (HC560-II) Back
166
See, for example, Q178 Back
167
Ev p42 (HC560-ii) Back
168
See para 11 Back
169
Ev p41 (HC560-ii); Ev p44, para 1.1.6 (HC560-ii), Background papers
from The National Society of Allotment and Leisure Gardeners Ltd,
Region 5, West Midlands Back
170
Geoffrey Sherlock [Ev not printed] and Q173 Back
171
Q195 Back
172
Q174 Back
173
Ev pp36, 44-45 and 8-11 (HC560-II) Back
174
Ev p31 (HC560-II) Back
175
Q247 Back
176
Q185 Back
177
Ev p65 (HC560-iii) Back
178
Ev not printed Back
179
Ev p45 (HC560-II) Back