RESTRICTED
ENFORCEMENT UNIT
STATISTICS
Notes
The majority of new cases (new referrals) raised
in the Restricted Enforcement Unit come from intelligence reports.
The FCO may raise for discussion particularly pertinent reports,
but the reports do not originate in the FCO. The balance of new
referrals are raised at the REU by members from information they
have received.
The REU considers possible and/or potential
breaches of export controls and sanctions/embargoes involving
strategic/controlled goods globally, not just involving UK companies,
entities or personalities. As the Committee has asked for REU
statistics, the figures given for arms exports relate to arms
exports globally, not just from the UK, to destinations not subject
to embargo.
The statistics for arms exports include all
possible military equipment supplies and dual-use technology,
particularly that which may be used in weapons of mass destruction
programmes (WMD).
1998
1st Quarter (January-March)
Total number of new referrals to the REU: 444
Of which 19 were raised by the FCO.
Of these:
10 related to arms exports;
2 related to possible breaches of UK legislation
enforcing an arms embargo.
The embargoes concerned were:
UN embargo on Sierra Leone (Sandline);
National embargo on Iran.
The other seven were possible breaches of the
UN embargoes on Iraq and Libya by other countries.
1997
4th Quarter (October-December)
Total number of new referrals to the REU: 478
Of which 18 were raised by the FCO.
Of these:
9 related to arms exports;
2 related to possible breaches of UK legislation
enforcing an arms embargo.
The embargoes concerned were:
National embargo on Iran.
The other seven were possible breaches of the
UN embargo on Iraq by other countries.
3rd Quarter (July-September)
Total number of new referrals to the REU: 409
Of which 14 were raised by the FCO.
Of these:
11 related to arms exports;
1 related to possible breaches of UK legislation
enforcing an arms embargo.
The embargo concerned was: National embargo
on Iran.
The other two were possible breaches of the
UN embargo on Libya and the EU embargo on Burma by other countries.
2nd Quarter (April-June)
Total number of new referrals to the REU: 413
Of which 16 were raised by the FCO.
Of these:
10 related to arms exports;
2 related to possible breaches of UK legislation
enforcing an arms embargo.
The embargoes involved were:
National embargo on Iran;
UK company suspected of activity breaching embargoes/sanctionsnot
clear from minutes which ones.
The other four were possible breaches of the
UN embargoes on Iraq and Libya by other countries.
1st Quarter (January-March)
Total number of new referrals to the REU: 462
Of which 28 were raised by the FCO.
Of these:
14 related to arms exports;
5 related to possible breaches of UK legislation
enforcing an arms embargo.
The embargo concerned was:
National embargo on Iran.
The other nine were possible breaches of the
UN embargoes on Libya and Iraq by other countries.
1996
4th Quarter (October-December)
Total number of new referrals to the REU: 421
Of which 28 were raised by the FCO.
Of these:
16 related to arms exports;
2 related to possible breaches of UK legislation
enforcing an arms embargo.
The embargo concerned was:
National embargo on Iran.
The other 10 were possible breaches of the UN
embargoes on Libya, Iraq and Rwanda, and EU embargoes on Nigeria,
Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan and China by other countries.
3rd Quarter (July-September)
Total number of new referrals to the REU: 498
Of which 23 were raised by the FCO.
Of these:
13 related to arms exports;
4 related to possible breaches of UK legislation
enforcing an arms embargo.
The embargoes concerned were:
National embargo on Iran (x2);
National embargo on Argentina (1); and
the UN embargo on Libya (1).
The other six were possible breaches of the
UN embargoes on Libya and Iraq, and the EU embargo on Burma, by
other countries.
2nd Quarter (April-June)
Total number of new referrals to the REU: 453
Of which 23 were raised by the FCO.
Of these:
16 related to arms exports;
2 related to possible breaches of UK legislation
enforcing an arms embargo.
The embargo concerned was:
National embargo on Iran.
The other five were possible breaches of the
UN embargoes on Iraq and Libya, and the EU embargo on China, by
other countries.
1st Quarter (January-March)
Total number of new referrals to the REU: 647
Of which 19 were raised by the FCO.
Of these:
12 related to arms exports;
3 related to possible breaches of UK legislation
enforcing an arms embargo.
The embargoes concerned were:
National embargo on Iran (x2) and the EU embargo
on China.
The other four were possible breaches of the
UN embargoes on Libya and Iraq by other countries.
1995
4th Quarter (October-December)
Total number of new referrals to the REU: 467
Of which nine were raised by the FCO.
Of these:
7 related to arms exports;
1 related to possible breaches of UK legislation
enforcing an arms embargo.
The embargo concerned was: UN embargo on Libya.
The other one was a possible breach of the UN
embargo on Libya by another country.
3rd Quarter (July-September)
Total number of new referrals to the REU: 486
Of which seven were raised by the FCO.
Of these:
6 related to arms exports;
one related to possible breaches of UK legislation
enforcing an arms embargo.
The embargo concerned was: National embargo
on Iran.
2nd Quarter (April-June)
Total number of new referrals to the REU: 507
Of which 34 were raised by the FCO.
Of these:
30 related to arms exports;
1 related to possible breaches of UK legislation
enforcing an arms embargo.
The embargo concerned was:
National embargo on Iran;
The other three were possible breaches of the
UN embargo on Libya by other countries.
FCO LEGAL
OPINION ON
THE APPLICABILITY
OF THE
UN SECURITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION 1132 (1997) TO
THE LEGITIMATE
GOVERNMENT OF
SIERRA LEONE
The issue is whether the arms embargo imposed
by the Security Council in resolution 1132 (1997) applied to the
legitimate government in exile.
Paragraph 6 of resolution 1132 reads as follows:
"Decides that all States shall prevent the sale or
supply to Sierra Leone, by their nationals or from their territories,
or using their flag vessels or aircraft, of petroleum and petroleum
products and arms and related matériel of all types,
including weapons and ammunition, military vehicles and equipment,
paramilitary equipment and spare parts for the aforementioned,
whether or not originating in their territory."
No exceptions were provided to the arms embargo.
The effect therefore was that any sale or supply of arms to Sierra
Leone was prohibited by the resolution.
In implementing arms embargoes in domestic law
it is standard practice to include provisions which will enable
the embargoes to be effectively applied. Thus the Sierra Leone
(United Nations Sanctions) Order 1997 prohibited the sale or supply
of arms etc., to "any destination for the purpose of delivery
directly or indirectly, to or to the order of a person connected
with Sierra Leone", unless the delivery was licensed by the
President of the Board of Trade. "Person connected with Sierra
Leone" was defined as including the Government of Sierra
Leone and any other person in or resident in Sierra Leone.