Select Committee on Home Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Annex E

Note by the Home Office

SECURITY MEASURES PROPOSED BY THE CHIEF INSPECTOR OF PRISONS

"LOCKED ARCH" MACHINE

  The machine works in the following way: an individual would step into the archway and a door would close behind them, enclosing them in a small room. A sample of the air inside this "room" would then be taken and analysed by the machine to identify the presence of drugs.

  The Prison Service has already commissioned research on machinery to aid in the detection of drugs. Manufacturers of such equipment were invited to submit their machines for assessment in order to determine those which were most suitable to the needs of the Prison Service; these could then be subject to trials. No manufacturer submitted a design for a "locked arch". The Police Scientific Development Branch are examining the use of machines which can detect the presence of drugs by use of a swab. The most promising machine so far is a machine made by "Barringer" which appears to be user-friendly, ergonomic and produces the most reliable results, but there are other machines still under consideration.

  This type of machine operates by running a swab over skin or clothing which is then analysed by the machine, which can identify the presence of drugs broken down by group within a very short space of time. Site trials of these machines will be undertaken shortly. Recommendations about the use of these machines will be made in due course. There are, of course, resource and management implications attached to the use of such equipment. This will form part of the overall consideration, as will the issue of whether "sniffer" machines are more effective than dogs in detecting the presence of drugs.

PASSIVE DRUG DOGS

  Presently, 22 prison establishments have dog sections; these are based at dispersals and core local prisons. They are supported by the National Dog Support Group which provides training and is responsible for the maintenance and oversight of the treatment of dogs. These dog sections include active and passive animals, some of which are dual purpose. A further 50 establishments have an active or passive dog presence (some have both). The National Dog Support Group have a team of 18 dogs which are available on request to establishments for general searching purposes or to meet an immediate operational need.

  There are a number of issues to be considered concerning the Chief Inspector's suggestion that passive dogs are used to patrol landings at night. The first concerns the training of the dogs; the second sufficient resources to ensure that such patrols could work both effectively and safely.

  Passive dogs are trained to detect drugs on a person and would be unlikely to give an indication outside a cell door as they are not trained to do this. Active drug dogs are trained to seek out concealed drugs, but if a prisoner were smoking out of the window there might not be a sufficiently strong scent for the dog to identify.

  Additional staff would also need to be present to search both the prisoner and the cell once a dog had given an indication that drugs were present. The number of staff required to do this are currently not available at night. Additionally, the security of the prison would also be compromised if inmates were unlocked at night without sufficient staff present. Finally, once the cell was searched, and if nothing were found, the prisoner would need to be subjected to an "on suspicion" mandatory drug test to find out whether drugs had in fact been consumed. Again, sufficient staff would need to be present to ensure that the activity could be managed.

  It is for the Governor of each establishment to decide when dogs should be used. A current review of the management of the National Dog Support Group is considering how to make best use of overall resources.

June 1998


 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 15 July 1998