Select Committee on Health Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum by Age Concern England

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES (HSS 34)

5.  ORGANISATIONAL AND FUNDING SYSTEMS AND PROCESSES FOR PLANNING, COMMISSIONING AND SERVICE DELIVERY

  5.1.1  Age Concern believes that the views of older people, their carers and representatives should be actively sought about whether services proposed would meet their perceived needs; in monitoring their effectiveness; and, further, that agencies must be able to demonstrate that common concerns have been addressed.

  5.1.2  The expectations and perceived needs of many users and carers are remarkably simple. For example, research (Update Issue 4, Nuffield Institute for Health, September 1997) shows that most users and carers want domiciliary care workers to be reliable, competent, cheerful and kind. Work from the Fife Users Panel (If they would listen, Age Concern Scotland, 1997) identified the basic of concerns of older people that they should not be discharged from hospital back to an unheated home, without food, with an unmade bed, and a delay before they receive any domiciliary services. It is astonishing that issues such as these, which have been raised for decades, have still not been fully addressed.

  5.1.3  Older people may not be best served by current funding systems. For example, an individual's need for services or equipment tends not to conveniently begin and end in one financial year; yet local authority budgets are set and must be balanced on an annual basis. In contrast, NHS Trust hospitals will be allowed to balance their budgets over a three-year period. There may therefore be a need to consider, and develop models, for, a "life cycle" approach to budgets for statutory agencies to better plan, commission and deliver services more in line with the ways in which needs for these may arise and continue.

  5.1.4  If statutory agencies are to plan effectively on a longer-term basis, there is also a need for central Government to consider its role in the "life cycle" approach to budgets. For example, the unexpected change in funding levels from Government for community care services from social services departments in 1994 led to reductions in services for many older people, contrary to local authorities' plans which had been based on original Government calculations. Age Concern believes that setting of national criteria for eligibility will prove helpful for planning and budgetary purposes.

  5.1.5  Age Concern believes that:

    —  the views of users and carers must be taken into account in the planning process;

    —  "life cycle", budgets could more closely follow the pattern of an individual's need for services.

The effect of self funding

  5.2.1  There are key problems for local and central Government in planning for those who will need financial support or services in the near future which also impact on those individual older people. For example, an increasing number of local authorities do not arrange places in homes for self-funding residents. This means there is no accurate information as to how many residents will, as their capital reduces, become eligible for local authority financial support, nor at what point during any one financial year that may occur.

  5.2.2  Without this knowledge further budgetary problems are created for local authorities. If criteria have already been tightened, the net effect of unforeseen residents approaching their authority for support may be to further tighten criteria and reduce availability of services generally. This has an inevitable domino effect on those waiting inappropriately in hospital, and those waiting in the community who may seek to make greater calls on primary health care services.

  5.2.3  Individuals who are assessed as self-funding for residential and nursing homes, but whose capital is tied up in property, may have no immediately available money from which to pay for care. Local authorities have the power to help pay towards care costs whilst property is waiting to be sold through the creation of a legal charge against its value. However, this is only a power and not a duty.

  5.2.4  More and more individuals are reporting to Age Concern that their authority is refusing to create a legal charge, which we believe is linked to problems with budgets which are set and must be spent on an annual basis. Although ultimately the legal charge will be repaid to the authority, this may not be in the same financial year that the charge was created. Authorities may increasingly feel that, faced with annual budgetary constraints, they can ill afford to tie up their budgets in this way. This is causing huge problems for individuals as the only option may be to seek commercial loans which can cause older people extreme anxiety and may be difficult to obtain.

  5.2.5  Age Concern believes that:

    —  the Government must investigate the way in which local authorities can be made aware of the rate at which self funders in their areas become eligible for financial support;

    —  where people who require residential or nursing home care have a home to sell and want the local authority to make arrangements pending the sale of the home, the authority should have a duty to do this and not assume that the person can fund themselves in the interim.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 10 August 1998