Select Committee on Health First Report


APPENDIX 20

Memorandum by Nottinghamshire County Council

Welfare of Former Child Migrants (CM 130)

Summary of evidence

  This Inquiry provides an opportunity to secure redress for the harm and injustice suffered by the former Child Migrants.

  This redress should include:

  —  enhancing and extending the social work support, family finding, and reconciliation services offered by the Child Migrants Trust;

  —  providing direct financial assistance to enable former migrants to visit the UK.

  —  for over 10 years Nottinghamshire County Council has shouldered the largest share of the financial cost of supporting the Child Migrants Trust. The British and Australian Governments should acknowledge their responsibility for past policies and should undertake to put the trust on a firm and adequate footing.

Introduction1. Nottinghamshire County Council welcomes the Committee's Inquiry into the welfare of former Child Migrants. The story of child migration is one that many people exposed to it for the first time find literally incomprehensible. Few can understand now how so many children could be taken from the UK to settle in the Commonwealth. It is only through reading the testimony of individual former migrants that one can begin to grasp the enormity of the impact of the Child Migration Scheme on both the migrants and their parents. Undoubtedly, the Committee will hear first hand about these experiences and the effect of child migration.2. However, now is not the time for recrimination but for redress. The greatest service the Inquiry could render would be to ensure that the reality of child migration is acknowledged and that urgent measures are put in place to ease the burden on former migrants and their parents before it is too late.

Nottinghamshire County Council3. It was only fortuitous that Margaret Humphreys was working for Nottinghamshire when she was first approached by a former migrant, thus starting the chain of events and research which led to her uncovering the enormity of the issue. For over 10 years, the Nottinghamshire County Council has supported this work in both the early stages of research and discovery and subsequently through the Child Migrants Trust.4. The County Council has been privileged to be in a position to help address a very serious moral and social issue. Recent history shows the value of local authorities having both the resources and the vision to address issues which are outside parochial concerns or the limits of "local administration". Without the practical, political, and financial support from the County Council, in partnership with the Child Migrants Trust, it is unlikely that child migration would have achieved the profile which is shown by the Committee's Inquiry. Without the capacity for independent action on the part of the local authority this support would not have been possible.5. Many migrants visiting the UK make a point of visiting both the Child Migrants Trust and Nottinghamshire County Council. A recent letter from the International Association of Former Child Migrants and their families described Nottinghamshire County Council as "the conscience of Britain" on this issue.

Background6. It is over 50 years since child migration recommenced after the Second World War. Until as late as 1967, child welfare charities in this Country sent large numbers of children to the Old Commonwealth countries, especially Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and Rhodesia. It is estimated that nearly 10,000 children were emigrated in the post-war period, the majority destined for Australia.7. The reality of this policy is summarised below:

  Children as young as three were separated from their families and brought up in institutions thousands of miles from home.

  They were removed from Britain often without the knowledge and consent of their parents.

  Many were told that their parents were dead, although this was often untrue. Their names were changed and they were often separated from their brothers and sisters.

  They were often placed in large institutions, isolated from the wider community, where many experienced severe deprivation and near slave labour conditions.

  Many experienced degrading physical, sexual, and emotional abuse.

  Their discharge from institutional care, around 16 years of age, was often without adequate preparation.

  Few were given details of their history and family background. As adults seeking family information their enquiries were frequently met with bureaucratic indifference and, at times, calculated deception.8. Through the work of the Child Migrants Trust, and the more recent establishment of the International Association, the depth of bitterness and hurt which it felt by former migrants and their families is shown. For many parents being reunited lifts a lifelong burden of guilt. It is only through the experiences of the former migrants who were denied knowledge of their background that one appreciates fully the importance of identity and family histories.9. As time passes as parents age the need for urgent action to reunite them with their children becomes more pressing. Further delay in seriously addressing these issues will mean that it will be too late for many.

The Child Migrants Trust10. The Child Migrants Trust was established in 1987 to:

  reunite Child Migrants with their families.

  provide social work support to the migrants to help them come to terms with their past

  provide social work support to parents.11. Again, the evidence of former Child Migrants will be testimony to the value of the work of the Trust. The recognition which is now being given to the reality of the child Migration Scheme and the experiences of former migrants should not disguise the fact that the Trust has frequently had to struggle against responses ranging from official indifference to active and organised opposition.12. The Committee may receive evidence arguing that the migrating agencies have easier access to historical records and therefore should undertake this work. However, over the last ten years the Trust has developed a great deal of expertise in tracking down families which other agencies would find difficult to replicate. But more significantly, the other players in this sorry story are tainted with the past—neither governments nor the migrating agencies have the credibility with the former migrants that the Child Migrants Trust has. It is widely acknowledged as a highly professional, neutral, and respected social work agency.13. Although the work of the Child Migrants Trust is national and international, the County Council has since the outset been one of its chief supporters in both financial and other ways. The core work of the Trust in the UK is currently funded by grants from Nottinghamshire County Council, the Department of Health, other authorities, and sundry donations and income.14. Core funding in 1997-98 is broadly

£000
Nottinghamshire County Council 84
Department of Health 25
Sundry 10

The Department of Health grant was renewed in 1997-98 for two years on a tapering basis and ends in 1998-99 with a final grant of £20,000.In addition, National Lottery funding has been secured for further social workers to work with parents in the UK. The Australian Government funds two workers to work with former migrants in Australia. The ability to meet the requirements of these grants depends on having a secure core.15. Despite the continuing financial restraint on local authorities Nottinghamshire County Council has remained committed to the Trust and to its work with former Child Migrants. However, the County Council is not in a position to provide the additional resources which the Trust needs if it is to make serious inroads to the size of the problem and respond effectively to the numbers of migrants coming forward for help. Last spring the Leader of the County Council wrote personally to the leaders of other Social Services authorities asking for contributions. A small number did make a financial contribution, but most wrote to acknowledge the issue but report that they felt unable to contribute because financial constraints and because most felt that Central Government should acknowledge responsibility for earlier policy failures.16. The task of reuniting former migrants and their parents or families is a finite one, and one which in view of the ageing nature of parents is becoming increasing pressing. A serious commitment from the British and Australian Governments to put the Trust's resources on a firm and adequate footing for, say, a period of at least five years would make a significant impact on resolving the unresolved episodes in many people's lives and erase the stain on our social history.

Child Migrants17. The establishment of the International Association domonstrates both the scale of the issue and the intention to focus collective action on seeking redress. The Committee will no doubt wish to hear the voice of former Child Migrants at first hand.18. Child migrants are a varied group of people coming from a wide range of backgrounds and current circumstances brought together only because of their history and the effects that child migration had on them. It is this common thread that makes them unique and remarkable. Some have gone onto make significant achievements whilst others have struggled with the continuing effects of their migration.19. The Committee may wish to consider what practical support can be made available perhaps along the lines of a fund to provide for practical assistance for migrants needing to research their backgrounds or wishing to see their parents and families, home country etc.

Recommendations20. The Inquiry provides an opportunity for the issue of child migration to be recognised and for action to be taken by Government to make whatever restitution is still possible.The Committee is asked to consider recommending that:

(i)  The Department of Health agree to take over the funding of the Child Migrants Trust and to put it on a firm and adequate footing for, say, the next five years to facilitate Child Migrants discovering their family background and being reunited with their parents where this is still possible.

(ii)  The British and Australian Government establish a fund to provide practical assistance to Child Migrants wishing to visit the UK to research their personal history and be reunited with their families.

February 1998


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 10 August 1998