Select Committee on Health Minutes of Evidence


ANNEX A

CHILD MIGRATION — LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS

NINETEENTH CENTURY PROVISIONS

Poor Law Amendment Act 1834 (Ch 76, 4 and 5 William IV)

Section LXII enabled rate payers to set up a fund to pay for the emigration of poor persons settled in the parish who were willing to emigrate.

Poor Law Union Charges Amendment Act 1849 (12 and 13 Victoria, Ch 103)

Section XX authorised the Board of Guardians of any Poor Law Union to spend up to £10 per person on the emigration of poor persons settled in the parish.

Poor Law Amendment Act 1850 (13 and 14 Victoria Chapter 101)

Section IV extended the provisions of the above statutes to enable the emigration of poor orphans and deserted children under the age of 16 at public expense. There was a proviso that no emigration of an orphan or deserted child should take place without the consent of the orphan or deserted child given before the justices. A certificate of consent signed by two of the justices had to be presented to the Poor Law Board.Repealed by the Poor Law Act 1927.

Prevention of Cruelty of Children Act 1889

Section 5 provided for the committal of a child into the care of a fit person or relative where his parent had been committed for trial or convicted of one of specified offences, or bound over to keep the peace. Whilst the order was in force the fit person had the powers of a parent over the child: presumably these would have extended to emigration.The Act was repealed by the 1894 Act (below).

Custody of Children Act 1891

The 1891 Act dealt with applications by parents to the High Court for return of a child, who was being brought up by another person or the poor law guardians, and enabled the court not to order the child's return if the parent had abandoned or deserted the child, or allowed him to be brought up at another person's expense for so long that the court was satisfied that the parent had been unmindful of his duties, unless the court was satisfied that the parent was a fit person to have custody. It was not repealed until the 1989 Children Act, but must have fallen into disuse a long time before that. It does not confer any rights on the person caring for the child, or deal with emigration.

Prevention of Cruelty to Children Act 1904

Section 6 provided for committal to the care or a relative or other fit person named by the court in similar terms to the 1889 Act, save that by section 6(5) the fit person had no authority to arrange for the child's emigration. This required the consent of the Secretary of State who could give it if emigration appeared to him to be for the benefit of the child.Repealed by the 1904 Act (below).

Reformatory and Industrial Schools Act 1891 (54 and 55 Victoria Ch 23)

By Section 1, the managers of a certified reformatory or industrial school were enabled, with the consent of a youthful offender or child detained or out on licence, to apprentice him or to dispose of him into trade or by emigration, such apprenticing or disposition to be as valid as if the managers were his parents. Any emigration required the consent of the Secretary of State as well as of the child.

Poor Removal Acts 1845-1900

These Acts provided for the removal from England of poor persons born in another part of the United Kingdom who were not settled in England but were receiving parish relief. Most concerned removal to Ireland.

TWENTIETH CENTURY PROVISIONS

Prevention of Cruelty to Children Act 1904

Section 6(1) provided for the committal of a child to the care or a relative or fit person including any society or body corporate established for the reception of poor children or the prevention of cruelty to children named by the court, where the parent had been convicted of or committed for trial for certain offences, or bound over. By section 6(5) the child's emigration required the consent of the Secretary of State as in the 1894 Act.Repealed by the 1908 Act (below).

Children Act 1908

Section 21 dealt with the committal to the care of a relative or other fit person of a child under the age of 16. Section 21(6) provided for the Secretary of State in any case where it appeared to him to be of benefit to a child or young person who had been committed to care, to arrange for the young person's emigration. The fit person was not empowered to arrange for emigration.Section 70 provided for the apprenticeship or disposal by emigration of any youthful offender or child detained or out on licence from a certified school by the managers as if they were his parents, provided that the consent of Secretary of State was required for disposal by emigration. A certified school a reformatory school for industrial training of young offenders or an industrial school for the industrial training of children found begging etc.Repealed by the Children and Young Persons Act 1932 (which was itself repealed by the 1933 Act).

The Empire Settlement Acts 1922

The Empire Settlement Acts 1922 provided a mechanism for the use of public funds to subsidise the cost of emigration to the colonies. Section 1(1) stated that:"It shall be lawful for the Secretary of State, in association with the government of any part of His Majesty's Dominions, or with public authorities or public or private organisations either in the United Kingdom or in any part of such Dominions, to formulate and co-operate in carrying out agreed schemes for affording joint assistance to suitable persons in the United Kingdom who intend to settle in any part of His Majesty's Overseas Dominions."The Act was basically a finance measure and did not specifically empower voluntary organisations (or anyone else) to send children in their care abroad. However, if the Secretary of State agreed that a child migration scheme fell within the terms of the Act, whether set up by a voluntary organisation or any other body, public funding may have been provided to subsidise the cost of the scheme.After 1922, a series of Acts extended the period for which the authorisation contained in section 1(1) of the 1922 Act was valid. The last of these Acts was the Commonwealth Settlement Act 1967, which provided that the liability of the Secretary of State to make payments in respect of schemes agreed under the 1922 Act would last until 31 May 1972. The 1922 Act, the Empire Settlement Act 1937 and the 1967 Act are properly cited as the Commonwealth Settlement Acts 1922 to 1967.

Poor Law Act 1927

Section 102 authorised a Board of guardians with the consent of the Minister and in compliance with such rules and regulations as he may prescribe to procure or assist in procuring the emigration of any orphan or deserted child under the age of 16 who was chargeable to the Poor Law Union.Section 102 provided that a Board of Guardians should not procure the emigration of an orphan or deserted child unless the child had given its consent before a petty sessional court and the certificate of consent signed by two of the justices present had been transmitted to the Minister.Repealed by the 1930 Act (below).

Poor Law Act 1930

Section 68 enabled the County or Borough Council with the consent of the Minister and in compliance with such rules, orders and regulations as he may prescribe to procure or assist in procuring the emigration of orphaned or deserted children under the age of 16 chargeable to the county or county borough. It was provided that the Council should not procure the emigration of an orphan or deserted child unless the child had given its consent before a petty sessional court and a certificate of consent signed by two of the justices present had been transmitted to the Minister.The Poor Law Act was repealed by the National Assistance Act 1948.

Children and Young Persons Act 1933

Section 84(5) gave the Secretary of State power to authorise arrangements for the emigration of any child in the care of a fit person, if it appeared to him that it would be for the benefit of the child. The emigration of a child in care could not take place without the consent of the Secretary of State. The Secretary of State was required to be satisfied that the child consented and that his parents had been consulted, or that it was not practicable for the parents to be consulted.A fit person refers to the power of the juvenile court to commit a child to the care of a fit person, whether a relative or not, who was willing to undertake the care of the child, where the juvenile court was satisfied that the child was in need of care or protection. As an alternative a child could be sent to an approved school.By paragraph 7 schedule 4 the managers of an approved school had the power to arrange for the emigration of a child in their care with the written consent of both the child and Secretary of State. The managers were also required to consult with the parents in any case where it was practicable to do so.Repealed by the Children and Young Persons Act 1969.

Children Act 1948

Section 1 imposed a duty on local authorities to receive abandoned and orphaned children into their care.Section 17 enabled a local authority with the consent of the Secretary of State to procure or assist in procuring the emigration of any child in their care.The Secretary of State was not to give his consent unless he was satisfied that emigration would benefit the child, and that suitable arrangements had been made or would be made for the child's reception and welfare in the country to which he was going, and that the parent or guardian of the child had been consulted or it was not practicable to consult them and that the child consented Section 17(2). There was provision for the emigration of a child who was too young to express a proper opinion on the matter with the consent of the Secretary of State if the child was to emigrate with or to join a parent, guardian or relative.Section 33(1) The Secretary of State was empowered to make regulations to control the making and carrying out by voluntary organisations of arrangements for child emigration.Section 33(2) provided that any such regulations may require information to be given to the Secretary of State about the organisation and for enabling the Secretary of State to be satisfied that suitable arrangements had been or will be made for children's reception and welfare to the country to which they are going.

Children and Young Persons Act 1969

Section 24 dealt with the duty of a local authority towards children committed into its care following criminal proceedings. By Section 24(7) the local authority had the same functions as conferred on it in relation to other children by Part II of the Children Act 1948. This included the power to arrange for emigration under Section 17 of that Act.

Child Care Act 1980

This replaced and updated the 1948 Act.Section 24 empowered a local authority with the consent of the Secretary of State to procure or assist in procuring the emigration of any child in their care. By Section 24(2) the Secretary of State was only to be given his consent if satisfied that emigration would benefit the child and that suitable arrangements had been or would be made for the child's reception, that the parents or guardians of the child had been consulted or it was not practicable to consult them, and that the child consented to emigration. The Secretary of State could consent to the emigration of a child who was too young to form or express an opinion on the matter if the child was emigrate in company with or to join a parent, guardian or relative.Section 62 reiterated the power to make regulations to control the activities of voluntary organisations first set out in Section 33 of the 1948 Act.By Section 62(3) it became an offence to fail to comply with any such regulations.The Child Care Act was repealed by the Children Act 1989.

The Emigration of Children (Arrangements by Voluntary Organisations) Regulations 1982 (SI 1982/13)

These regulations set out the requirements to be fulfilled by voluntary organisations arranging the emigration of children, and mirror the provisions for local authorities set out in Section 24 Child Care Act 1980.These regulations ceased to have effect following the coming into force of the Children Act 1989.

Children Act 1989

Schedule 2 paragraph 19 sets out the provisions where a child in the care of a local authority is to live abroad. The leave of the Court and the consent of every person with parental responsibility are required in every such case.A voluntary organisation may not place a child whose placement it is responsible outside the British Islands (Foster Placement (Children) Regulations 1991, Art 10 (1) as amended SI 1991 no 910)

BACKGROUND TO BRITISH NATIONALITY LAW

THE BRITISH NATIONALITY AND STATUS OF ALIENS ACT 1914 (BNSAA 1994)

1. This country had no nationality law until the coming into force on 1 January 1915 of the BNSAA 1914. The Act conferred the common status of British Subject upon those persons who had specified connections with the Crown's dominions. The status of British Subject implied allegiance to the Crown.

2. In general terms that status was held by those people born within the Crown's dominions or naturalised there and by the first generation born elsewhere (of legitimate descent in the male line ONLY). The status could be lost by naturalisation in a foreign state or by making a declaration of Alienage. A British woman marrying an alien lost her British Subject status automatically on marriage before 1933 whether or not she acquired her husband's citizenship. From that date onwards she lost it only if she acquired the nationality of her husband. An alien women who married a British Subject automatically became a British Subject on that marriage. The nationality of minor children was tied to that of their father or widowed mother and they gained or lost British Subject status accordingly.

THE BRITISH NATIONALITY ACT 1948 (BNA 48)

3. At the Commonwealth Conference in 1947 it was agreed that each of the self-governing dominions (Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Union of South Africa, Newfoundland, India, Pakistan, Southern Rhodesia and Ceylon) would introduce separate citizenship for those persons who belonged to each country but all would continue to share the common status of British Subject or Commonwealth Citizen—both terms to have the same meaning. The UK legislation, BNA 48 created the status of British Subject, citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (BSCUKC) for all those whose connection was with the UK itself or with a place which on 1 January 1948 was still a colony. This did NOT include those self-governing countries listed above.

4. This Act provided for the acquisition of BSCUKC status by those born or naturalised in the UK or an existing colony and by the first generation born abroad. There was no longer any restriction on the holding of dual nationality and persons acquiring citizenship of a foreign state did not automatically lose British nationality as a result. Adult aliens could acquire BSCUKC status by naturalisation but Commonwealth citizens and minor children were eligible in certain circumstances to acquire it by registration. Women who married CUKC husbands after 1 January 1949 had an entitlement to be registered as CUKCs themselves subject only to the production of evidence of a valid marriage.

5. The Act also provided for two categories of persons to remain "British Subjects" only (ie not CUKCs). These were persons connected with the Republic of Ireland and persons connected with one of the self-governing dominions which had not yet enacted its own citizenship law. From 1951 onwards the only persons remaining in the latter category were those connected with India or Pakistan.

6. Over the years most of the remaining colonies acquired independence within the Commonwealth. Normally those CUKCs who acquired citizenship of the newly independent country ceased to be CUKCs on independence day unless they possessed specified connections with the UK itself or with a place which remained a colony.

THE BRITISH NATIONALITY ACT 1981 (BNA 81)

7. BNA 81 which came into force on 1 January 1983 replaced citizenship of the UK and colonies with three separate citizenship:

   (i)  BRITISH CITIZENSHIP: for those persons who had the right of abode in the UK as defined in Section 2 of the Immigration Act 1971.

   (ii)  BRITISH DEPENDENT TERRITORIES CITIZEN: for those connected by birth or descent with a dependent territory.

   (iii)  BRITISH OVERSEAS CITIZEN: for those who did not belong to categories (i) or (ii) above.The term "Commonwealth Citizen" no longer has the same meaning as "British Subject" although persons connected with the Republic of Ireland, India or Pakistan who were British Subjects under the 1948 Act (see para 5 above) retained that status under the 1981 Act.

8. Women, whether Commonwealth or Foreign, no longer have an entitlement to registration but spouses (of either sex) may apply for naturalisation after three years normal residence in the UK. Citizenship may now be transmitted through either the male or female line except that in the case of an illegitimate child it can be acquired only through the mother.

9. In general, since 1 January 1983, it has been possible to acquire British Citizenship automatically:

(i)  by birth in the UK to a parent who is either a British Citizen or settled here under immigration law;

(ii)  by adoption in the UK by a British Citizenship parent;

(iii)  by birth outside the UK to a parent who is a British Citizen "otherwise than by descent"; and

(iv)  by birth outside the UK to a British Citizen parent in Crown (designated) or European community service.

10. There are preserved entitlements to registration for a limited period only in the case of certain married women and minor children. Special rules also apply to the acquisition of British Citizenship by BDTCs connected with Gibraltar and the Falkland Islands.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 10 August 1998