Select Committee on Health Report




  4.  As can be seen from figure 2.2.1, the common ground between Health Authorities and trusts/DMUs is activity which has been both purchased and provided by the NHS in England. The traditional presentation of HCHS expenditure blurs the distinction between Health Authorities and trusts/DMUs by fitting the provider profile of expenditure to the Health Authority total of expenditure. A new method of constructing the programme budget information has therefore been devised. The new programme budget aims to capture the most recent year's expenditure made by Health Authorities and present that data in a more easily readable. The results are shown in Table 2.2.1.

  5.  There are major differences between the new HCHS programme budget format and the traditional format:

    (i)  The new format covers Health Authority expenditure regardless of whether it was provided by NHS or non-NHS providers. Conversely, private patients at NHS providers do not affect the figures>

    (ii)  The programmes are more logically structured and presentation is easier to follow. For example, all general and acute expenditure on the elderly is presented as one programme, whereas previously the geriatric programme (ie care led by a consultant geriatrician) was frequently, and wrongly, taken to mean all general care for the elderly.

    (iii)  A clear distinction has been drawn between programmes of care (columns) and method of care (rows).

COMPARISONS WITH LAST YEAR

  6.  In order to gain the maximum value and usefulness from the programme budget it is necessary to compare expenditure trends over a comparative period. Unfortunately, for the most recent years (due to a number of changes to data and accounting systems) this has not been possible and so in the following text we have adjusted the 1995-96 and 1996-97 date in order to give estimates of comparable totals.

  7.  In 1996-97 overall HCHS expenditure (excluding joint finance) was £21,987m compared to the adjusted 1995-96 figure of £21,672m. Therefore HCHS expenditure rose by 1.5 per cent in volume terms, ie after allowing for HCHS pay and prices increases, and by 1.4 per cent in real terms.

  8.  The pattern of spend between programmes differs for hospital services and those in the community (see Figures 2.2.2 and 2.2.3). The largest programmes in both sectors are elderly (general & acute) and adults (general & acute) although the proportion of total budget spent differs considerably. These two areas account for two thirds of hospital expenditure but less than half of the community sector's expenditure. Spending on learning disabilities in the community sector account for 17 per cent of this sector's expenditure, whereas only 3 per cent of hospital expenditure is spent on this programme. The proportion of expenditure spent on mental illness is similar in both sectors, as it is in both children (general & acute) and maternity.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 2 November 1998