Select Committee on International Development First Special Report


ANNEX B

Note by the Chief Scientific Adviser

Summary of conclusions of Risk Assessment

       -    In broad terms the individual risk of a fatality on an annual basis was moderate to high in areas 4 and 5, low in area 3 and minimal in areas 1 and 2.

       -    The longer-term individual risk on an annual basis from exposure to ash varied widely over the island, being at present low to minimal in the north (areas 1 and 2 in particular) and moderate to high in the west and the south (areas 3 and 4).

       -    In societal risk terms over the next six months and given the current distribution of population, there was around a one in 10 chance of one or more fatalities, a one in 100 chance of 10 or more fatalities and a one in 10,000 chance of 200 or more fatalities.

       -    These estimates of societal risk could be cut by more than an order of magnitude by strict implementation of the present Exclusion Zone boundary (southern edge of area 3) and made lower still by complete evacuation of area 3.

       -    Some groups were receiving high exposure to ash but perhaps not high enough to result in silicosis yet, though there was concern that small children might be at particular risk.

  Verbal descriptions of individual risk such as "high" and "moderate" are used in the same sense as the terms in the following individual risk scale defined and commonly used by the Chief Medical Officer (England) in describing probabilities of events.

Verbal descriptionRisk magnitude
Highgreater than 1 in 100
Moderate1 in 100 to 1 in 1,000
Low1 in 1,000 to 1 in 10,000
Very low1 in 10,000 to 1 in 100,000
Minimal1 in 100,000 to 1 in a million
Negligibleless than 1 in a million

  Issued by BGS 18 December 1997.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 16 February 1998