Select Committee on International Development Minutes of Evidence


ANNEX III

DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR STUDY OF LESSONS TO BE LEARNT FROM THE MONTSERRAT EMERGENCY RESPONSE

Introduction

  Since volcanic activity started on Montserrat in 1995, some £62 million of emergency aid, development assistance and budgetary aid has been committed by DFID. This has included the establishment of emergency air and sea links, the building of a new jetty: power and water supplies in the north of the island: housing for those displaced from the central and southern parts of the island: improvements to education and health facilities in the north and the maintenance of essential services. In addition, assistance has been provided for people relocating from Montserrat to Britain and elsewhere in the Caribbean. In the light of this considerable level of support and the important read across to other emergency situations, a study is to be commissioned to determine lessons to be learnt from the emergency response to the Monsterrat crisis. The study will be undertaken by outside specialists.

Purpose

  The purpose of the study is to review DFID's preparations, organisation and delivery of emergency aid in response to the Montserrat crisis and identify findings and lessons learnt particularly with general application to aid responses to prolonged natural disasters.

Specific Objectives

  In consultation with the GOM, DFID and the FCO, the external specialists will review the emergency response to the Montserrat crisis against six key criteria:

    (i)  Appropriateness: the appropriateness and timeliness of the responses provided, including the balance between emergency aid, development assistance and budgetary aid.

    (ii)  Cost-effectiveness: effectiveness of the interventions in terms of the cost of particular activities or of the unit costs of the assistance. Assessment of value for money; benefits in relation to costs.

    (iii)  Impact: conclusions on the impact on affected populations, e.g., number of lives saved by the interventions, extent of alleviation of suffering, the provision of relief and benefits.

    (iv)  Coverage: extent to which the effectiveness of interventions involved considered targeting of the affected population.

    (v)  Coherence: coherence between the key actors (DFID, FCO, GoM, OGDs) in planning and delivery of interventions. Effectiveness of co-ordination mechanisms and consultation processes.

    (vi)  Connectedness: consideration of relief-development "linkages" or the "continuum", as appropriate. Connections between emergency and other forms of aid.

Outputs

  Based on its findings the external specialists will produce a narrative report for DFID containing an executive summary of main conclusions and recommendations. This should take account of the December 1997 DFID Evaluation Synthesis of Emergency Aid report.

Timing and Duration

  Work should begin in July 1998 and be completed by . . . including up to . . . days overseas and . . . days report writing. An additional . . . days will be allowed for background reading and pre-departure and post visit briefing with DFID.

DFID


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 4 August 1998