Select Committee on International Development Minutes of Evidence


AID MANAGEMENT OFFICE, MONTSERRAT

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR REVIEW OF SOCIAL WELFARE SYSTEM

1. Brief Description

  1.1 This consultancy will review current systems of social welfare in Montserrat and make recommendations for reform to meet the immediate and future needs of the population.

2. Background

  2.1 Following intermittent and destructive volcanic activity since July 1995, the people of Montserrat have experienced a series of evacuations resulting in a situation today where all of the remaining population is living in the northern third of the island. During the period, the population has decreased from around 10,000 to about 3,000 (March 1998).

  2.2 Social welfare in Montserrat has traditionally taken the form of a variety of assistance schemes, many of them in existence prior to the volcanic emergency. The policy approach, objectives and targeting of the pre-volcanic system have been distorted by measures introduced to cope with the emergency conditions.

  2.3 At present, social welfare includes the following schemes:

    (i)  Public Assistance.

    (ii)  Social security and pensions.

    (iii)  Health care.

    (iv)  Education.

    (v)  Food Welfare Scheme.

    (vi)  Housing subsidies (including shelters, rental support, lease-purchase support, grants and loans.

    (vii)  Care of the elderly.

  A brief description of these Schemes is included at Annex I.

3. Overall Objective

  3.1 The overall objective of the review is to make recommendations for the reform and development of the social welfare system in Montserrat, to address the needs of those who would otherwise be in hardship in a manner which is cost-effective and which avoids the creation of a long term dependency culture.

4. Scope of the Work

  4.1 The consultants will:

    —  review the recent Social Survey and Social Situation Analysis, and undertake any necessary additional research to establish levels/need for income support;

    —  consider the priorities and options of the local population (a local working group will be established to assist with this task);

    —  set out the key principles of GoM's current social welfare policy, identify any areas where policy objectives have not yet been set, and facilitate GoM in their development;

    —  investigate the operations of existing social welfare schemes and consider their effectiveness for meeting policy objectives and welfare needs, particularly for the most vulnerable;

    —  consider the interactions between existing and proposed social welfare schemes and the personal income tax regime and the implications for future tax policy;

    —  consider the benefits available to Montserratians who re-locate to elsewhere in the Caribbean through the DFID resettlement schemes, and the results of the UNICEF rapid assessment of the status of Montserratian families in the Caribbean, in order to assess the relative incentives created by these schemes and by on-island existing and proposed social welfare schemes;

    —  review traditional community- and family-based support systems and consider ways of rebuilding or sustaining those within a reformed system of state-provided social welfare, this should include a review of remittances;

    —  consider need for support to the elderly including options for residential and community care;

    —  review social welfare schemes in the region which may provide useful lessons for Montserrat;

    —  develop argued and costed options for future system(s) of social welfare.

5. Outcome and Deliverables

  5.1 The deliverables of the study will be:

    (a)  a review of the current system of social welfare to include:

        —  effectiveness in meeting policy objectives and welfare needs;

        —  consideration of the incentives created by systems on Montserrat and elsewhere (including those available within relocation packages).

    (b)  a brief review of social welfare systems in the region;

    (c)  options for a reformed social welfare system including the replacement (or reform) of the food voucher system which will;

        —  provide an effective social safety net;

        —  provide an appropriate framework for economic incentives;

        —  reduce dependency and restore traditional family—or community-based support systems;

        —  be efficiently targeted at the most poor and vulnerable groups;

        —  be transparent and accountable;

        —  be sufficiently flexible to accommodate uncertainty in the event of on-going volcanic activity;

        —  be cost-effective, simple in design and inexpensive to administer.

    (d)  Recommendations for a revised system which will include:

        —  a statement of policy objectives;

        —  a statement of the groups to be targeted by the system;

        —  the delivery mechanisms to be adopted;

        —  proposals for institutional and administrative arrangements;

        —  proposals for any changes in the income tax structure;

        —  cost estimates.

    (e)  design of transitional arrangements, if necessary, which are: sensitive to the situation in Montserrat and can cope with the current emergency and immediate needs.

6. Competency and Expertise Requirements

  6.1 This review is likely to require the input of specialists in social development and social security/social welfare and economics. Familiarity with systems of social security in the Caribbean and with the current situation in Montserrat would be highly desirable.

  6.2 It is expected that the consultants will require a period of five weeks on Montserrat (though not all team members may be needed for all this period).

  6.3 The external consultants will work closely with a local working group which is expected to comprise officials from the Ministry of Health, Education and Community Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Trade and Environment (with responsibility for housing), Ministry of Finance, Emergency Department, DFID's Aid Management Office, the Red Cross and Council of Churches.

  6.4 It is expected that the consultants with the working group, will undertake extensive consultations, perhaps around a series of discussion papers. An early discussion session may be scheduled with the Executive Council (of GoM Ministers) (ExCo).

  6.5 Towards the end of the period, it is expected that the team will make a presentation of the options to the ExCo.

  6.6 A UNICEF regional rapid assessment survey is currently scheduled to produce preliminary results in June and final results in July. In the event that this timetable slips, the social welfare review consultants may need to return to the region to discuss the implications of the results of the survey.

  6.7 The social welfare review consultancy is expected to commence in June.

7. Reporting Requirements

  7.1 The consultancy team will be expected to report as follows:

    —  an inception report detailing the programme of the consultancy to be submitted to the Aid Management Office and GoM five days after arrival in Montserrat;

    —  draft outline of final report before departure;

    —  Final report within seven days of departure.

8. Proposal

  8.1 Consultants are required to produce a proposal including:

    —  appreciation of the terms of reference;

    —  proposed methodology for the study;

    —  CVs of team with responsibilities—including those of team leadership

    —  bar chart showing application of time of team members to tasks on- and off-island;

    —  arrangements for administrative support and report production;

    —  full costing of salary and other costs.

  8.2 Consultants should note that there is currently no hotel accommodation on the island. Consultants will either be accommodated in self-catering accommodation on-island or in a hotel in Antigua (or a combination). Although some support from the AMO will be available, consultants should be prepared to be administratively self-sufficient.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 4 August 1998