Select Committee on International Development Memoranda


MEMORANDA

COMMONWEALTH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Memorandum from the Department for International Development

COMMONWEALTH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: A PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP

1. THE POLICY CONTEXT

  1.1 The White Paper on International Development published in November 1997 sets out the Government's new approach to international development and in particular refocusing its efforts " . . . on the elimination of poverty and encouragement of economic growth which benefits the poor . . . ."

  1.2 The Government is determined to mobilise an international commitment to meeting the international development targets relating to economic well-being (reducing by one-half the proportion of people living in extreme poverty by 2015), human development and environmental sustainability and regeneration.

  1.3 Achieving these targets in the poorer countries requires economic growth substantially in excess of population growth. The economic growth rate required to halve the proportion of people living in extreme poverty (i.e. with an income of less than $1 per day) by 2015 in a particular country depends upon the degree of inequality. A World Bank staff paper (Demery and Walton 1997) estimates that to achieve the target, average annual per capita income growth rate for developing countries will need to be some 1.3 per cent in South Asia and 1.9 per cent in sub-Saharan Africa. If the poorest groups in society could receive a greater share of the benefits from growth the required growth rate would be less; alternatively the targets might be exceeded.

  1.4 These growth rates are achievable with the right domestic and international policies. For many countries it will require higher domestic savings and investment. But domestic savings need to be augmented by beneficial foreign capital inflows.

  1.5 In 1996 total private capital flows to developing countries amounted to $247 billion, of which $119 billion was direct foreign investment. But the least developed countries receive less than 2 per cent of the total direct foreign investment.

2. ENCOURAGING PRIVATE CAPITAL FLOWS

  2.1 It is part of DFID's wider remit to encourage private capital flows to the poorer countries through a range of policies. These include working:

    —  internationally, to establish a multilateral framework for investment;

    —  with UK based business, to promote ethical codes of business conduct.

  2.2 DFID is exploring other ways in which it might facilitate UK private investment flows by improving access to information and reducing up-front costs and risks.

3. THE COMMONWEALTH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

  3.1 The CDC is the Government's main instrument for directly mobilising investment in developing countries, particularly the poorest. Over the last fifty years it has made a substantial contribution to development. It now has an investment portfolio that totals £1.56 billion, with around 80 per cent of the portfolio in countries with a GNP/capita of less than $1,600. CDC has a network of 27 offices and self finances some £300 million of new investment each year. The Corporation's activities cover investments in a wide range of sectors including infrastructure, agri-business, manufacturing and financial services. As well as making investments along side other investors, CDC also has a portfolio of businesses majority owned and managed by CDC.

  3.2 CDC's strategic direction is presently agreed with Government on the basis of Quinquennial Reviews. The strategic targets were last agreed in 1992: the targets and most recent performance against them is as follows:


TargetsPer cent1997 19961995

Return on investment (three year average) min 87.618.1 8.1
Board approvals in poor (IDA eligible) countries min 708581 90
Approvals in private sectormin 80 1009695
Equity as percentage of approvals (Including quasi-equity) min 255233 43
Approvals in Africa (internal CDC target) min 303532 47

1 Eight per cent before exceptional investment provisions for South East Asia.


4. OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS

  4.1 As part of the wider Departmental Spending Review DFID considered the future policy options for CDC. It was recognised that CDC, with its long experience of managing businesses and investing in developing countries, was a unique asset that could make a more substantial contribution to the sustainable development of these economies and help mobilise other, private, capital. A dynamic CDC, successfully investing and mobilising private capital into the poorer economies of the world, could not only have a direct effect on growth but also a strong demonstration effect by showing that private investors can achieve attractive returns from investing in poorer countries.

  4.2 Equally, it was recognised that while CDC remained wholly in the public sector it would not expand substantially. Like other similar public sector bodies it is subject to public sector financial controls. The CDC has the power to borrow commercially but if it did so in the UK in order to invest more in developing countries, this would count against the Public Sector Borrowing Requirement (PSBR). Within an agreed public expenditure framework this would require a corresponding reduction in DFID's development assistance expenditure allocation. CDC would, additionally, be required to borrow on terms no less advantageous as those on which HMG could itself borrow (the least cost rule).

  4.3 CDC could borrow overseas to a limited extent in order to invest in developing countries without it counting against the PSBR, though it must still meet the least cost rule. In practice the scope for meeting the least cost rule is very limited as CDC has found in recent years. The only example of such borrowing is from the European Investment Bank which has provided limited funds on favourable terms for onward investment in developing countries.

  4.4 CDC can and does manage third party funds to a limited extent (for example the Commonwealth Private Investment Initiative Funds) but it cannot as a statutory corporation introduce private capital directly into its own operations.

  4.5 Even with a growing development assistance programme, financing CDC exclusively from public funds will always face firm limits and have an opportunity cost: i.e., we would have to do less in other areas.

5. PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP

  5.1 We therefore concluded that CDC could contribute more effectively to the sustainable development of poorer countries if we established a long-term public/private partnership that would benefit both from its association with Government and from the participation of the private sector. The introduction of private capital would enable CDC to make a lager contribution to development.

  5.2 Prior to the announcement by the Prime Minister in October 1997 and the publication of the White Paper in November 1997, DFID had commissioned and received advice externally that, provided the partnership was designed satisfactorily, there would be private sector interest in participating.

  5.3 One important element of the Partnership is that it should be classified as outside the public sector so that it can attract private capital without it counting against the PSBR. Government proposes to retain a substantial minority interest together with the Golden Share and invite private investors to take the majority interest. Government would expect to retain this interest for the foreseeable future.

  5.4 The emphasis will be on CDC continuing to do what it does best and building on its experience and network of overseas offices with a continued focus on the poorer countries of South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa; regions that have not so far benefited from private capital flows.

  5.5 The purpose of the Partnership may be summarised as "to maximise CDC's success in creating and growing long-term viable businesses in developing economies, especially the poorer economies, achieving attractive returns for shareholders and implementing ethical best practice".

  5.6 Detailed work on the design of the Partnership is continuing. The key issues are designing the framework to secure the development goals for the company and creating the right legal structure and the financial structure of the new company. The initial focus of work has been on the design of the partnership framework. Work on the detailed legal and financial structure will follow in the light of this.

  5.7 The approach taken is to ensure that the development goals are transparent and clearly entrenched from the start of the Partnership (for example, through golden share type provisions). This is important in order to provide clarity for both the public and private sector investors.

Investment Policy

  5.8 The CDC Partnership will be required to make investments consistent with an investment policy which has particular focus on the poorer developing countries. A specific target will be set for the percentage of new investments which are made for the benefit of poorer economies and there will also be a requirement to continue to focus on sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, reflecting CDC's present strategic direction. The investment policy could only be changed with the agreement of the partners.

Ethical Policy

  5.9 The CDC Partnership will also be required to implement and report on a code of ethical policy and practice which meets international best practice. The code will cover various issues including social and environmental appraisal, response to human rights abuses, activities which CDC will not invest in, and standards, for the managed businesses, for a range of issues including health, housing and employment.

  5.10 Since August 1997 CDC has made substantial progress in developing a new code of practice. The code will take some time to develop and CDC is currently consulting extensively with all staff.

Other Aspects of the Relationship

  5.11 DFID would continue to work closely with the new CDC Partnership in developing joint projects and programmes on the ground and will consider asking CDC to manage specific new initiatives or ring-fenced funds.

The Legal Structure

  5.12 There is a range of options for the final legal structure of the new Partnership and these are currently being examined. The choice will be influenced by the need to create a committed pool of funds for investment, the desire to allow for a wide marketing of shares at the right time and, importantly, the need for tax efficiency comparable with other vehicles for investing funds overseas.

Timing

  5.13 The Government intends to put legislative proposals to Parliament as early as possible with a view to seeking private investor participation within the lifetime of the present Parliament. The precise timing would depend upon such factors as the continued development of CDC business market conditions and consideration of value.

6. DEVELOPMENT IMPACT

  6.1 The new CDC Partnership will be able to grow and so mobilise additional finance for development and sustainable livelihoods. By focusing on the poorest countries and investing successfully in them, it should also have strong demonstration effects and lead to some reduction in the perceived risk of operating in those markets.

  6.2 The nature of business activities may change to some degree as a result of the new Partnership. Investors would be buying into CDC because of its strengths and existing competitive advantage and it is unlikely that they would seek a material change in the nature of the business. The focus on agri-business, infrastructure, manufacturing and financial services is expected to continue. CDC would continue to operate equity funds which offer finance for smaller business. There would also be opportunities for CDC to manage programmes for DFID, for example to target micro enterprise.

  6.3 Private investors can be expected to seek a higher return on capital than that currently achieved by CDC. This higher return will come as CDC moves more and more into equity rather than loan business. This trend is already underway and DFID have been requiring CDC to meet targets for new equity business for some time. Equity is a scarce resource in many developing countries and usually makes a stronger development contribution than loans because it ensures that risk is shared with the developing country business and because equity positions allow CDC to offer governance and management skills. The requirement to turn-over the equity positions, normally through local capital markets, will also develop the local financial sector. Greater profitability will also flow from CDC's ability to finance itself partly through debt and, therefore, to leverage its returns.

  6.4 The focus on a higher rate of return is consistent with the development goals of the new organisation. Investing in profitable businesses, without recourse to subsidy, is more likely to ensure the sustainability of the livelihoods created. The focus on the poorest countries (which are not targeted to such an extent by other international financial institutions) means that CDC is unlikely to crowd out other sources of finance. The equity product offered by CDC is complementary to those products offered by organisations such as IFC and EIB.

  6.5 It has been agreed that any proceeds raised by substituting private for public capital will be available to DFID to use for development activities. It is too early to forecast the amount and timing of these proceeds.

Department for International Development

21 April 1998


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 4 June 1998