Select Committee on International Development Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 70 - 79)

WEDNESDAY 24 JUNE 1998

Mr Will Day and Mr David Bryer, Mr Robert Smith, Director, Ms Marie Staunton, and Ms R Boycott.

Chairman

70. I think we should restart. I understand that Mr Will Day of the Disasters Emergency Committee and also Mr Robert Smith of UNICEF have got opening statements. Before you begin can I say thank you very much for coming today to give evidence. I am sorry we have fallen behind time but I think you were with us during questions so perhaps that informs the answers you will be able to give us. For the benefit of the shorthand people and us could you introduce your team and then give us a statement. Perhaps you would like to start, Mr Will Day?

 (Mr Day) I am Will Day, Chief Executive of Care International but I am here as a member of the Executive Committee of the Disasters Emergency Committee. I am joined by David Bryer of Oxfam whose organisation is also a member of the DEC.

71. Thank you. Mr Smith?

 (Mr Smith) I am Robert Smith, Executive Director of the United Kingdom Committee for UNICEF and this is Marie Staunton, Deputy Executive Director for Programmes.

72. We have Ms Rosie Boycott with us who has been reporting for The Express.

 (Ms Boycott) Yes, I am the Editor of The Express and we have been running an appeal on behalf of the famine.

73. You are very welcome. Thank you for coming. We have read your most interesting series of articles. Mr Will Day, perhaps you would like to start us off.

 (Mr Day) Mr Bryer will do so on behalf of the DEC.

 (Mr Bryer) I will be very brief because I realise time is short. First can I say we very much welcome the opportunity to appear before the Committee. From the development agencies we very much value the work of this Committee. It makes a huge difference to us and we have looked with a lot of interest at what you have been doing. For us this is a really exciting thing that this Committee now exists. We are very aware that the debate on Sudan has tended to emphasise the difference between the Secretary of State and the agencies and I would like to put on record on behalf of the DEC how much we value the energy and commitment of the Secretary of State and what she has brought to this role of running the new Development Department. In South Sudan there are certainly two or three points on which we do have disagreements, but what I would also like to say is on the whole, as indeed on most other issues, there is an enormous area of agreement and much of that came out in what she just said. The things on which we very much agree are certainly that Sudan needs peace. We share the Secretary of State's concern about the media's focus on disaster coverage. That of course came out of the conference where some of this debate started. Concentration on disaster rather than good news is an issue which the media and the NGOs have been talking about. That conference was set up for that very purpose. It may be an issue which you in the Committee would like to look at in the future. It is an important one about how people's perceptions of the developing world really are formed. We also—I think this is perhaps the most important point—very much welcome the changed importance in the British Government's view of Sudan. We as agencies have been lobbying for many many years on the importance of Sudan, the need to take this war seriously and to do all that can be done to stop it and that has been falling on deaf ears for a very long time. I think it is exciting that now we see these new diplomatic moves with the British Government taking the lead with IGAD, and now with the American government, in Nairobi and so on. That is something we very much welcome. We also welcome the very generous contributions from the UN appeal. It is good to see the United Kingdom Government as the third largest donor. The other thing I think I would very much agree with what Clare said is that at least out of this debate we have been having over the last month or so has come real attention on to Sudan. That is very very important after all these years of neglect. I think it is clear how necessary that is when you think of what the normal situation is in Sudan. We are talking at the moment about an extra disaster but that is in a country which over the years has suffered terribly from war and from poverty. Just four statistics. In the decade ending 1995 in a population of 27 million, eight million were without access to health services, 10.5 million to safe water, 20 million to sanitation and 129,000 children died each year before the age of five. If that happened in Britain we would think that was a major disaster. That was the norm in Sudan before what has happened in the last year. So we are very happy to answer anything we can to help understand the situation and also the situation of us as NGOs.

74. Thank you very much indeed. Mr Robert Smith?

 (Mr Smith) Thank you very much, Chairman. I would like initially to agree and associate ourselves with everything that David Bryer has said, above all with the belief that we share that what the people and above all the children of Sudan need is peace. We welcome the work of the Secretary of State to try to find a political solution to conflict in a country where UNICEF has actually been working since 1948, 50 years. Let me add four short points regarding UNICEF and the UK Committee for UNICEF which I think and hope will be helpful in the questions and discussions to come which identify special characteristics of UNICEF and I apologise if some members of the Committee are already very familiar with them. One, UNICEF is unique in the United Nations system in having brought together from its earliest days in the 1940s a mix of voluntary support from governments and from ordinary people. We are responsible for mobilising political and public support on behalf of children. So that I think affects the way in which we work with the public and with Parliament. Two, the mix finds its expression in industrialised countries through its national committees for UNICEF—37 of them like the one that Marie Staunton and I represent here in the United Kingdom. As Committees for UNICEF we are independent and accountable to our own Boards of Trustees and to our own donors here in the United Kingdom as well as to UNICEF itself internationally for the money we raise and the education work we do. It is quite a daunting set of accountabilities we have. Marie and I therefore, that is what I wanted to stress, speak on behalf of the United Kingdom Committee for UNICEF rather than for UNICEF as a global organisation. Three, UNICEF and its committees are a voice and a channel for support for children in all circumstances, peace and war. The special needs of children are so often overlooked and lost in the broader picture concerned with the politics and economics in Sudan as elsewhere. We do have a special role to say on behalf of children, "Remember me". UNICEF's new Head of Emergencies, Neil Kastberg (?) will be going to Sudan in the next week or two and would I am sure be very happy to give a briefing to Members who wish to have a further update after his return which I think will help to maintain that focus and that concern on the needs of children. Fourthly, it is out of its responsibility for the whole child that UNICEF's work is primarily with the long-term development needs of children in 161 countries. We are present before, during and after virtually every disaster or emergency wherever it occurs. Right now, for example, we are working in 23 zones of conflict in different parts of the world, so we are ideally placed to get that continuum between long-term work and emergency activities, health, education, nutrition and clean water in the very teeth of war. It is action in these areas that has often brought about cessations of hostilities, such as the Secretary of State mentioned in her presentation. Those days of tranquillity, corridors of peace, zones of tranquillity for the sake of children are things that UNICEF has had a great deal of experience in helping negotiate and that is one thing that I think we would very much hope that we could offer assistance to if this step can be taken vis-à-vis Sudan as well.

75. Thank you. Rosie Boycott, would you like to add anything at this stage?

 (Ms Boycott) I would like to add that we became involved after sending writers out and after me and other people on the staff being exposed to committees and the famine in Sudan and just that helpless feeling of wanting to do something about this. We launched an appeal which raised an enormous amount of money. We came in behind UNICEF because we wanted to make this children to children. I feel very strongly that it is not wrong to raise money in this respect, that we are responsible on a wider level for people in the wider world, not just our country. Readers responded magnificently. They did not show any signs of compassion fatigue and other things that we were then later accused of by the Secretary of State.

 Chairman: We have prepared a series of questions to try and cover the ground, but we shall have additional ones as we go along. Perhaps I could ask Mr Rowe to start us off.

Mr Rowe

76. Perhaps you could tell us what the current situation in Southern Sudan is both in terms of fighting and the need for humanitarian assistance, and would you like to give us a forecast of the need, as you see it, in the coming months?

 (Ms Staunton) It has been said several times that Sudan is a complex emergency and I think the fastest way to explain it is with a map and so here is one that I prepared earlier! All the pink areas are those under the control of the government of Sudan. This is a very rough map. If that is the border of Southern Sudan here, that area there is government controlled. In addition to that you have all the pink places and several more which are garrison towns, which are also government controlled. All those are served in relation to the relief operation from Khartoum and that is called the Northern sector of OLS. The rest of the area which is not coloured pink, one or two towns but largely rule areas, is in the control of the rebel areas, the SPLA and that is what is called OLS Southern sector. What is the position about transport in the Northern sector? There is a road in the Northern sector. You can get from Khartoum as far as Wau through a road which is really quite dangerous, which has militia on it, which is not safe to travel on.

Could you just tell us where the oil comes from?

 (Ms Staunton) There is some oil up around the Numa Mountains which is in the middle here.

77. Is this where Chevron and other big companies are?

 (Ms Staunton) Yes, although at the moment Sudan is an oil importer rather than exporter. In relation to transport, it is also possible to get a barge—-

Chairman

78. The shorthand writers are trying to take a transcript of our proceedings. Perhaps when you are explaining to us you would not rely too heavily on your map but make certain you mention places so that they can put them down and therefore we can follow it in the transcript and on our maps later.

 (Ms Staunton) Certainly. I do have a note of what I am saying which might help the shorthand writers later. So here there is also a barge which goes down to Juba, you can get a road to Malakal and then a barge goes there which WFP use for food and immunisation programmes. There is also the railway line which has been referred to which runs from Khartoum to Wau. It is at the moment used for military purposes only. When the railway line runs, and it runs at a walking pace, it is accompanied by militia who then clear and raid on either side of the railway line. Many of the allegations of human rights abuses relate to that. As I am sure the Committee knows, malnutrition has its own vocabulary, so when I talk about malnourishment I mean people who are 80 per cent weight for height; when I talk about severely malnourished I mean children who are 70 per cent weight for height, which means that they are well into the danger zone; and 60 per cent weight for height is where life chances are very much threatened, particularly in a country like Sudan where there are not the medical facilities. In terms of access, therefore, to the government held areas in Bahr El Ghazal, we think we have access to about 25 per cent of people in the government held areas. We think the numbers are roughly about 300,000. There has recently been fighting around here. There have been raids by militia and we cannot presently get into Aweil where we know there are 9,000 people who are malnourished. All during May there were about 200 people a day going to Wau largely because they had been displaced by the fighting but also because their crops had not worked and that has now gone up to between 500 and 1,000 a day. So in Wau at the moment we are looking at about 20,000 people and by the end of the month it is looking like there are going to be 40,000 people in Wau. Of those, the malnutrition rate of the under fives in Wau is 40 per cent, four out of every ten children need immediately urgent supplementary feeding. In Upper Nile there is fighting between two factions on the same side. We have access to about 60 per cent of the people there. We think there are about 600,000 people at risk and the malnutrition rate is about 26 per cent. In certain areas, for example Panthou, it is higher, it is 55 per cent of children coming in from the area. There has been rain in this area. In Northern Bahr El Ghazal there has not been rain. In Eastern Equatoria, which is around Juba and Torit, we have access to about 33 per cent of the people there. That is about 550,000 children and a malnutrition rate of somewhere around 28 per cent just in those government areas there. In terms of supplies, therefore, and UNICEF is concerned about supplies for children in particular, we have in the Northern sector vaccines for about two months and thanks to the British government we have got Unimix, which is a special food for malnourished children, until September. In Wau, for example, as well as malnourishment, diarrhoea, malaria and TB are also problems. In the southern sector which is largely served from Lokichokio in Kenya, as has been explained, planes are used. There is a road up from Yei up to Wau which has been used from time to time but not really in the rainy season and in the southern sector the number of planes usually flown, is one Hercules and two Buffalos and you have heard from the Secretary of State that has been scaled up now massively.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 11 August 1998