Select Committee on International Development Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 80 - 99)

WEDNESDAY 24 JUNE 1998

Mr Will Day and Mr David Bryer, Mr Robert Smith, Director, Ms Marie Staunton, and Ms R Boycott.

80. Where do they fly to?

 (Ms Staunton) They fly from Kenya, and they also fly from Uganda, they fly from Entebbe and they fly from El Obeid to eight feeding centres in Bahr el Ghazal and also feeding centres throughout Southern Sudan.

Ann Clwyd

81. I wanted to ask about the Hercules planes. One of the complaints they were making when I was there at the weekend was they could not get hold of Hercules planes.

 (Ms Staunton) That has been a problem and in fact two of the Hercules they have are not performing very well. They have asked the Belgian government to have two Hercules and they are trying to get one other from Angola from WFP. There are two problems. One is getting them but they think they may have located them now and the second is getting clearance. On 5 June both sides were asked for clearance and we are still waiting for that.

82. Have they asked the British Government because we have 51 Hercules in this country?

 (Ms Staunton) I am not aware we have asked the British Government.

Ms King

83. It would help Members when looking at that map to know that the country is approximately the size of Western Europe so when you are talking about a train going at walking pace you are talking about walking from London to Madrid or something ridiculous.

 (Ms Staunton) Thank you and when I am talking about flying from Bahr El Ghazal I am talking about three and a half hours each way. You can do it if you only stop for 20 minutes about twice a day.

Chairman

84. It does also mean that you cannot supply the quantities that your figures suggest by air alone?

 (Ms Staunton) If permission is granted for the outstanding planes and we therefore have seven Hercules, three Ilyushins, which are massive, they carry 30 metric tonnes and three Buffalos, the World Food Programme think they can meet the need and drop the food. There are two ways in which food is delivered. One is food for the population as a whole is dropped through special air drops in planes but for malnourished children you have got to land your plane, give the children Unimix and it has got to be administered by a nutritionist or a nurse and it is much more labour intensive. Therefore for feeding malnourished children you need people on the ground and the planes and stuff to put in the planes. So in terms of just the malnourishment requirement in Bahr el Ghazal at the moment which is you could say the epicentre, not the only area of the problems but the epicentre, there are about 700,000 people at risk who are malnourished and the level of malnourishment of children is about 35 per cent, something like 30,000 children. These are very rough figures. We are dealing with an area where there has not been a census and where even your estimates of population range from 2.5 million to five million.

Chairman

85. They are guestimates.

 (Ms Staunton) Yes. In Western Upper Nile which are the areas not held by the government here, there are about 162,000 people at risk, about 10,000 of those are children with a 25 per cent malnourishment level. One in every four (25 per cent) of children are malnourished. In Jonglei down here about 182,000 people are at risk and of those about 5,000 are children who are 25 per cent malnourished. In Eastern Equatoria, where most of the aid agencies work, there are about 300,000 people at risk, possibly about 5,000 children and we have not got anything reliable in terms of the malnourishment rates. There has been rain in Eastern Equatoria, Jonglei and Upper Nile. There has been some rain in Eastern Bahr el Ghazal but there has been not much rain in northern Bahr el Ghazal which of course makes the prognosis very depressing. Also there is military movement. In Bahr el Ghazal yesterday we had to evacuate Panthou which meant leaving the children in the feeding centre because the militia were reported to be coming and we had to get out. Hopefully we will get back in as soon as we can. That means the malnourishment level of those children is going to go right down. Therefore overall in the government-controlled areas there are about 1.3 to 1.5 million people at risk and in the southern sector there is about 1.2 million and the scale of the problem is greatest in Bahr el Ghazal but exists elsewhere.

Ann Clwyd

86. Is your estimate that 2.2 million people could be at risk from famine by next year?

 (Ms Staunton) 2.5 million.

Chairman

87. From right now not next year.

 (Ms Staunton) 1.3 in the northern sector and 1.2 in the southern sector.

Mr Rowe

88. Right now.

 (Ms Staunton) That would be right now.

Chairman

89. They can get it all in by plane.

 (Ms Staunton) If they get the clearance. It is not just the planes. As the Secretary of State was saying you do not just need the plane, you need the fuel for the plane and you need to pay for the plane, which is very expensive.

Ms Follett

90. Assuming that you have got the planes and you have got the food then do you have the centres and the people on the ground to administer the kind of rehydrant that you need?

 (Ms Staunton) This is an operation which is gearing up and there need to be more people on the ground particularly for the feeding of children.

Chairman

91. How do you prevent the food and supplies meant for children supplying the soldiers?

 (Ms Staunton) Well the soldiers are not marching on supplementary food for children. It is baby food and high energy biscuits. It is special food for children.

92. Is that all you are taking in?

 (Ms Staunton) No, it is basically Unimix, which is mixed up in various ways from corn and dried skimmed milk, high energy biscuits and oral rehydration salts going in for the infants, the children. For the adults there is food dropped.

Ann Clwyd

93. When I was leaving Lokichokio on Sunday the OLS man in charge was telling me that the following week flights would be cut by a half because they could not afford them. They had done their budget in the last two days and could not afford them.

 (Ms Staunton) In relation to budgets overall, as has been said, the UN budget is 48 per cent covered and WFP is 54 per cent covered which means WFP are saying their budget is covered at least to the end the August into September. As far as UNICEF in the north is concerned, and that is just UNICEF, we are 32 per cent funded which means we have Unimix until the end of September but we do not have essential drugs. In relation to the southern sector we are 54.8 per cent funded which means if the situation does not get worse we have enough supplementary food for children for the end of the year but we are about to ask for more money (which has not yet been communicated to governments) for the air bids of £2 million and also for nutritional supplements. I should say all I have been talking about is the overall picture. When you look at supplies all the agencies work together. There are supplies going in from all the other agencies and our budget depends on the fact that other agencies are putting supplies in. Just to finish the snapshot. In relation to the Nuba mountains, an area right in the middle of Sudan, access was in theory granted to the Nuba mountains at the beginning of May. Access had not been given for ten years. An assessment was agreed by all sides. The assessment has not yet been able to go in. There was a shooting there a couple of weeks ago so there is a security problem. The reason why the head of UNICEF's emergency programme is going into the area is to look at access to the Nuba mountains.

Mrs Kingham

94. I want to clear up this issue about the coverage of the aid promised. We have heard from the Secretary of State that funding is not a problem. You are saying that your budget at the moment is only 54.8 per cent covered and the World Food Programme budget was only—?

 (Ms Staunton) It is 54 per cent covered.

95. What do you mean by "covered"? Does that mean that you have asked for money and it has not been forthcoming and not been pledged, ie, there is no more money coming, or is that a statistical/logistical thing? Does that mean that is all the pledged money and therefore there is a great need for more money from some other source or does it mean that countries have pledged it but not yet delivered it?

 (Ms Staunton) No, it is all the money that has been pledged by countries, but fundraising happens throughout the year, it happens all the time. Unfortunately this time is the dry season for fundraising in Europe in that most government officials go away, but right throughout the year we will be trying to get that budget funded and we will be hoping that the other agencies in OLS also get their funds because then the supplies can be delivered. So it is an on-going process.

96. Are you worried about the money not being available or is this something that happens as a matter of course in disaster appeals, that you go through this pledging? Are you concerned the money will not be there or not, because if you are we ought to know about it?

 (Ms Staunton) I think one of the concerns from people on the ground was that last year the appeal was only 30 per cent funded overall. This year is a different situation. If you are working on the ground and you can see that you have got enough supplies for the next few months you also want to be sure that you have supplies later. But there is a process of continually reassessing and continuing communication and continually looking for more resources.

Mr Rowe

97. Did you get the impression from the Secretary of State's session with us today that ask and you shall be given?

 (Ms Staunton) I would hope so. We do regularly ask and we are in regular contact and we are pushing regularly for more funds.

Mrs Kingham

98. Do you get it?

 (Ms Staunton) We have so far received for UNICEF £900,000 for the work with children and that is part of an overall amount of £25 million which the UK government have given which puts them near the top in terms of funding.

 (Mr Day) UN appeals are traditionally under-funded and one of the things that NGOs often say is that they would like to see governments support UN appeals more. There has been a lack of confidence in the past in some appeals, but I do not think that gets away from the fact that this is a serious situation. The British government is the second largest donor to this new appeal and if there is anything they can do, it is to encourage other governments who feel they have international responsibilities to contribute to this appeal. I do not think we have a direct problem with the level of UK support from the government, but after all the UN is not an extension of the British government, it is an international body and I think there is a traditional under-funding of this kind of appeal.

Chairman

99. Who is the first contributor?

 (Mr Day) The United States.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 11 August 1998