Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of witnesses (Questions 325 - 339)

WEDNESDAY 15 JULY 1998

MR BRIAN GORMALLY and MS JAQUELINE IRWIN

Chairman

  325.  We are delighted to see you. We gather that Reverend Good is not going to be with us?
  (Mr Gormally)  No, I am afraid not. He sends his apologies.

  326.  I am sure you will be more than adequate to answer the questions we have. We have certain ground rules which I repeat at the beginning of each of these sessions. First, you are most welcome. Second, the questions may come from different corners of the horseshoe because we try and follow a logical sequence of questions. If at any stage you want to gloss anything you have said either later on in the session today or indeed in writing afterwards, please do not hesitate to do so. Finally, although we are already grateful to you for what you have sent us, I do not know whether there is anything you would like to say of an introductory nature before we begin?
  (Mr Gormally)  Thank you very much, Mr Chairman. Thank you for the invitation to come here today. I think the submission we have put in speaks for itself but I will perhaps make one or two introductory points. The first thing is that this submission very much looks to the future and is looking at the potential future of the prison system in Northern Ireland in the light of the Good Friday Agreement and the inevitable changes which will occur then. I think that the themes, if you like, of our submission are perhaps three. First of all, the need for openness in the Prison Service. There has been a major change since the 1980s in the style and the openness and communicativeness of the Prison Service, and we would like to see that continue, and in what we hope will be a peaceful situation, or at least a much more peaceful situation, openness of the prisons to the community to be increased. Then there is the question of the people in the Prison Service and we have addressed a number of issues, some of them controversial, in the submission that we have made, but certainly there will presumably have to be a down-sizing of the Prison Service in terms of numbers. We would like to see that accompanied by a commensurate increase in the quality and range of the work that the Prison Service undertakes within the prison. Then I think the third point would be the question of regimes and the opportunity that there is in a relatively small jurisdiction like Northern Ireland of developing new and innovative ways of handling what hopefully will be a much reduced prison population. Again, I think we have addressed some of those points. The only other point I would like to make in the introduction is that since this evidence was prepared we have prepared a short paper on the re-integration consequences or issues around the question of accelerated release, and we are quite prepared to speak to that today if you are interested, and we will certainly pass that paper on to you afterwards. That is on the various practical considerations around the question of early release rather than the principled issues which we have dealt with in other reports.

  327.  Thank you. If I can pick up one of the resonances of what you have just said from your original observations when you alluded to down-sizing, you specifically a moment ago referred to it in the context of improving the quality of work being done within the Service, but because you are also conscious of the under-representation of parts of the community in the Service, how do you think a correction of that condition would work during a down-sizing period?
  (Mr Gormally)  I think one of the big problems in Northern Ireland in trying to redress imbalances in the composition of any workforce is that it is very difficult where employment numbers are falling rather than increasing. Having said that, it is important to make a start and I think that in a number of leading industries, e.g. the engineering industry in Northern Ireland where overall employment has probably been falling over the past number of years, nonetheless imbalances are gradually being corrected. So the first point to make is that we would like to see a declaration of intent and it is disappointing to see the Prison Service's strategic plan makes no reference to this issue and that takes us past the year 2000. In terms of the practicalities of it, clearly in the downsizing situation I think it is necessary to be generous in terms of severance arrangements. How many people that will involve, at what age, what ranks and so on is obviously a very detailed question, but if there is a generous severance package then I think we might see the potential for recruitment patterns to change and for there to be a gradual change in the composition of the Prison Service. I do not think anybody expects massive moves suddenly.

  328.  Would you be able to give any instances where the under-representation of part of the community had actually affected the way the Prison Service had historically worked?
  (Mr Gormally)  I think that is a very difficult matter. In these circumstances you are often dealing with perception rather than necessarily objective reality. I think, also, to be fair, there is a major distinction, for example, between the Prison Service and the police service. Given that the people with whom the Prison Service are coming into contact on a daily basis are convicted prisoners, I think the religious background of those prisoners is likely to mean less to prison officers. In a situation where the police service is coming in contact with the community as a whole then I think the issue is rather more urgent and rather more sensitive. We are not making any accusations of sectarian behaviour here, but in common with every workforce, including our own in NIACRO, we have to monitor our religious composition and if there is an imbalance then we are obligated by law to do something about it. When you are looking at the coercive organisations of the state then it seems to us that the issue is more urgent than in other areas rather than less.

  329.  To what extent do you think the Prison Service is cut off from the society of Northern Ireland?
  (Mr Gormally)  There is an extent to which that is bound to be the case because there are security questions, there are questions of the standard of living and the fact that on the whole prison officers will move out of areas because they get quite a high income and therefore they will be buying houses in areas they do not come from originally. I think as well there is in any custodial service a danger of the attitudes of custody, the questions of control, the idea that everybody they are meeting in terms of their customers in their working life are held to be bad people, are seen in opposition to them. That can create a particular kind of culture which can be negative in terms of an open-minded approach to new developments. I think that is a common danger. I do not think there is anything particular about the Northern Ireland service in respect of that. Certainly we would like to see prisons being open to a much wider range of organisations and people from the community in terms of voluntary organisations with specific expertise in the realms of welfare rights or treatment of alcoholism or whatever so that the community in general is better informed about what goes on in the prisons and so that there is a counter to the possibility of the service becoming closed off from the community.

Mr Hesford

  330.  In one of your submissions to us at paragraph 3.5 you talk about the small pool of management and you use the phrase "closed world". Can you expand on what you mean by a closed world?
  (Mr Gormally)  I think at the beginning of the submission we talk about the Prison Service being a closed world. I think one has got to remember that over the last 30 years the prison system has very often been at the very centre of our violent political conflict. It has been the cockpit of many of the most distressing and violent episodes in the course of the troubles. In those circumstances it is very clear that the Prison Service felt itself to be under siege. Certainly it would have identified only with one section of the community and would have identified with those who feel themselves under threat from terrorist violence. In a situation where high security was necessary, in a situation where prison officers were being intimidated and killed, then it is inevitable that there is an aspect of a closed world. As I mentioned earlier, I think from the mid to late eighties onwards the Prison Service did make a very serious and effective attempt to become more open at least at management level and plans were discussed with a range of stakeholders, were published and openly argued about in the media and the Controller of Prisons and the Chief Executive then later started appearing in the media and so on. So I think there have been major developments. In a situation of transition from a violent political conflict to a new society that we hope we are building now in Northern Ireland, then the Prison Service is one of those institutions which has to open up and in a sense has to take a lead in opening up. I think we have seen how many of the political developments over the past period have been paradoxically led from inside the prison in terms of the paramilitary organisations and their prisoners. I think we now have an opportunity, in terms of a state institution taking on a new culture, to give a new openness, a new pluralism and a new diversity and quality of work.

  331.  Some might say you make a surprising suggestion of secondment in terms of management issues from prisons in Britain, certainly one can understand that, southern Ireland and mainland Europe to boost the calibre of management. Can you just explain how that might work, particularly in relation to southern Ireland and mainland Europe?
  (Mr Gormally)  I think the first question is why not? What is so special about a prison system that it is not open to any member of the European Community to apply for the jobs? It may be that there are some security reasons for that being the case. I am not sure what they would be given that presumably vetting can be carried out in the same way on any citizen of the EU. The Narey Report has identified the difficulty of developing a pool of management in such a small system and has talked about opening it up to the rest of the UK. In principle I do not see any reason why it should not be opened up to the rest of the EU.

  332.  In terms of post-the Good Friday Agreement, do you see that there are any significant weaknesses in the current management and/or management structure that may need to be addressed, so that post-the Good Friday Agreement situation they have a better chance of bedding down?
  (Mr Gormally)  I am not sure I would put it so much in terms of weakness, but one has to understand the very great difficulties involved in making a transition from a situation of violent confrontation to a situation of a relatively peaceful society. In those circumstances I think it is going to be extremely difficult for those people who have spent most of their working lives in a situation where their main aim, if you like, has been to contribute to the suppression of terrorism, to change to circumstances where their main aim is to serve the community in a somewhat different way. I think we have seen a difficulty in officials and other people making adaption, for example, to the change of policy in regard to accelerated release of politically motivated prisoners. It is very difficult to argue vociferously and hard for one policy and then implement and argue for its opposite. In those circumstances, the normal process of change may very well be helpful. I stress I am not casting aspersions on any individuals here, only that the process of transition, of transformation of society in Northern Ireland is extraordinarily difficult for everybody and particularly difficult for those in institutions of the state, I would suggest.

  333.  I saw when I was formulating the question to your colleague, Ms Irwin, you were nodding. I wonder if you have any comments in addition to what Mr Gormally has said?
  (Ms Irwin)  No, I do not think so, not on that issue.

  334.  You yourself, Mr Gormally, used the word "calibre", that you need a higher calibre of management, and yet when I asked you about weakness you declined to adopt the word weakness. In what way do you need a higher calibre of management if there is no current weakness?
  (Mr Gormally)  I think you must understand, first of all, that Northern Ireland is a very small place. If you are talking about management, you are not talking of a generality but a handful of individuals, so I do not want to have anything I say taken to be particular individual criticisms.

  335.  So you are ducking the question?
  (Mr Gormally)  No, I am about to answer it, but I want to explain why I am not happy with using specifically critical language in that sense. I think a higher calibre of management is needed in the sense that we are moving to a new situation, we are moving to a situation where pluralism and diversity is the order of the day, and we are also moving out of a situation where I would suggest that the prison system, and particularly the holding of politically motivated prisoners, has been based on a kind of organised hypocrisy for the past certainly decade or decade and a half. That has been under the cover of what is supposed to a normal prison system, in fact politically motivated prisoners have been treated as belonging to cohesive groups, having negotiations with their command structures and so on. The difficulty of managing that process has been immense, but it is a very different situation where reports like the Narey Report and the views that the Chief Inspector of Prisons has put forward, are saying, "Look, let's come clean about what the prison system has been like and is like at the moment in respect of politically motivated prisoners, let's build on that openness and go forward into a situation where hopefully that kind of accommodation will no longer be necessary." In that sense I think it is a different calibre at least, shall we say a different style, of management which is required. It needs to be more open, more flexible, and if you like more professional in strictly management terms as opposed to situations in which people have been managing a politically charged situation where the main criterion has in fact been the overall political situation rather than the day-to-day management of a very difficult institution.

  336.  Ms Irwin, not only did I see you nodding this time, I saw you making notes. Do you have anything in addition to your colleague's answer?
  (Ms Irwin)  You are very suspicious of me! I made a note of what the query was, that was all. In respect of what my colleague has just said, I agree with that. On the question of higher calibre I guess a broader experience or different experience is the issue we are looking at here, and it is the same in any management system. It is the opportunity to get new blood and new ideas and new thinking, so it is not a reflection of what goes before, it is simply about circulation of ideas and philosophies and approaches.

  337.  What level of management are you thinking of here?
  (Ms Irwin)  The Narey Report particularly made reference to middle management, but I think all management systems depend on what comes above and below them to be able to operate well. So we could apply that to almost any part of the system.

Chairman:  I am sure Ms Irwin does not need to maintain a marmoreal aspect to protect herself from any questions from the Committee.

Mr Hunter

  338.  Can we return to the theme of transformation which you were talking about a moment or so ago? On the assumption that the early release goes ahead and within a relatively short time virtually all or perhaps all the terrorist prisoners are released, what is going to be the knock-on effect in your judgment and your opinion on the others, the so-called ODCs who are left behind? Is this going to give rise to a novel form of problem within the Prison Service?
  (Mr Gormally)  A novel form of problem in terms of handling the ODCs?

  339.  Novel in the sense on this scale it has not arisen before.
  (Mr Gormally)  First of all, one has to remember that the vast majority of people who go through the prison system in Northern Ireland are ODCs, if you want to use that term. While between two-thirds and three-quarters of the daily average population have been politically motivated prisoners, in terms of the 2,000 or so who pass through the system in any given year, then most of those are ODCs. So the system has a lot of experience of dealing with ODCs and clearly what we would want to do is to stress the refocus of the Prison Service on the particular needs of this population, to look again for example at the fairly high number of sex offenders we have in the system, to intensify and make the regimes better and indeed more demanding for such people, as I think we argued in the paper. So in that sense, there has to be a transformation of the main goal of the Service, and it will be to deliver a flexible, varied and demanding regime for on the whole ordinary prisoners. There is what we would hope to be a short-term issue, which I thought you were going to address, with those politically motivated prisoners who will not be eligible for release.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 18 September 1998