Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 100 - 119)

MONDAY 15 DECEMBER 1997

SIR JOHN KERR, KCMG, MR PETER WESTMACOTT, LVO, MR JOHN KERBY, and MR LEE BEAUMONT

MR JAMIE MORTIMER

  100.  But we actually have some residual powers in these islands, do we not?
  (Sir John Kerr)  Yes, of course we do.

  101.  So why go to the EC to do what we might be able to do ourselves?
  (Sir John Kerr)  The question of whether and to what extent Mr Monti's tax package applies in the Dependent Territories is a question that will need to be explored. Your question is a very fair one: should we be insisting that they go for much higher levels of tax in order to get rid of the possibility that some people who run their company out of the Caymans or BVI or keep their money there are crooks or are doing it to evade taxes? I think my answer has to be no, we have to clean up the act, we have to give proper reporting systems, we have to have proper regulation, but I am not sure that we need insist that they introduce very high tax rates. Do we do that for the Isle of Man? Do we do that for the Channel Islands? Why should we be doing it particularly for the Cayman Islands? The money in question in the Cayman Islands, the taxes not being paid, if I follow your drift correctly, would actually mainly be American taxes in the Cayman Islands. Now, of course if it was evasion, it is a crime whoever's taxes were being evaded, but I do not think you can assume that it is evasion.

  102.  I think your answer to my question is no. If you look at the bottom of the appendix 1 on page 43, in relation to the Turks and Caicos, it is the only one where the under "Governor's responsibilities" you actually list financial services. Financial services are listed in the economies for all the others, but it is only in the Turks and Caicos that financial services are listed as the Governor's responsibilities. Is that an oversight or is it a reality that it is an exception?
  (Sir John Kerr)  I cannot explain that. I am not the author of it. [3]

  103.  But you are only the man in charge.
  (Sir John Kerr)  No, this is not my Report, sir; this is the Comptroller's Report.

  104.  But you did agree this Report.
  (Sir John Kerr)  I read this Report, but I did not write it.

  105.  It does not matter who wrote it, with respect, because, as accounting officer, if you agreed it, we take it you are not going to argue with it and you are going to be able to explain to us any anomalies which we see in it.
  (Sir John Kerr)  What I mentioned before was that in relation to the British Virgin Islands, there is a difference. Financial services in the British Virgin Islands and Bermuda are regulated by, and they are the responsibility of the Minister of Finance, not the Governor. In the other Dependent Territories, they are the responsibility of the Governor, so if there is an editorial mistake in this paper, I apologise for that, but it is not my paper.

  106.  Well, that is helpful anyhow and it has clarified a point, but let me now turn to figure 8 on page 33. You have referred to pressure which has been put on the British Virgin Islands to cut back on the number of insurance companies, but if we look at the Turks and Caicos, we find that they have by far the largest number. They have virtually more insurance companies, with 1,911 registered, than all the others in that list put together and yet this is an area where the Governor has responsibility for financial services.
  (Sir John Kerr)  That is correct.

  107.  Why did you make the British Virgin Islands put their house in order and why has the Governor not used his existing power to make the Turks and Caicos put their house in order?
  (Sir John Kerr)  Mr Chairman, I do not want to say now that there is anything wrong with insurance companies that choose to base themselves in the Turks and Caicos Islands. I agree with you, there is a surprising number of them.

  108.  Well, it is quite a few, is it not?
  (Sir John Kerr)  Yes, quite a few. We have, with the assistance of the DTI, been looking at the responses from all of the Caribbean Dependent Territories, including the Turks and Caicos Islands, to a series of questionnaires on their insurance industry and their regulatory practice. The DTI's view, I am told, is that the quality of the legislation, that is legislation to regulate the insurance industry, is broadly adequate, but the quality of the regulation needs to be further improved.

  109.  Well, they are obviously carrying out a great investigation before they give a licence because they make people pay nearly £50 to get the licence, so clearly they take the matter seriously, do they not?
  (Sir John Kerr)  I am sure that is correct, sir.

  110.  You are sure which is correct? Well, both are correct because they charge just under £50.
  (Sir John Kerr)  I am sure they take it seriously and--

  111.  You do?
  (Sir John Kerr)  Yes, I am quite sure.

  112.  Well, in that case, turn to the next page and look at figure 9 and how do you explain that the Turks and Caicos Islands have only two professional staff employed in the supervisory work in relation to financial services? Two, and that is just concentrated on the insurance companies. There are not only the 11,000 business companies and the others that they have, but they have nearly 2,000 insurance companies with two people supervising them and they only charge just under £50 to get a licence to set up there and the Governor is in charge.
  (Sir John Kerr)  Yes, the Governor is in charge. Mr Williams, I am advised that this is a rather particular and specific kind of insurance, and this may astonish you--

  113.  No, nothing astonishes me in this Committee!
  (Sir John Kerr)  The companies in the TCI are largely captive insurance companies going for one-off company risk insurance and there is not a great deal of insurance for--

  114.  It is not for the individual consumer.
  (Sir John Kerr)  It is not the Pru. Therefore, the risks are perhaps lower. Nevertheless, we do think there is more to be done in this area, as I was saying in response to the questionnaire issue.

  115.  Perhaps you could let me have again a slightly fuller note on that. [4]Thank you for the information you have already given, but, you see, if we have an island like the Turks and Caicos, where the Governor does control things and we find the situation I have described, it is hardly surprising then that Mr Love has found the situation at the bottom of page 33 where the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands told you to get lost, in rather non-diplomatic language, did they not?
  (Sir John Kerr)  Well, they may have done in February 1996.

  116.  They failed to respond, I think is the phrase.
  (Sir John Kerr)  I am advised that the legislation they now have in draft is legislation that they will be implementing. As I said--

  117.  No, no, that is not what you said.
  (Sir John Kerr)  I said to Mr Love--

  118.  No, no, no. I listened very carefully to what you said to Mr Love. He pointed out that you withdrew the original proposals because they said they were not having anything to do with them and you then put forward weaker proposals and you said you would welcome the support of this Committee because despite the twelve-month time limit, they said "Get lost" again in effect, but they still had not implemented them and you were appealing to us to support you. Now you are telling us you were wrong in that.
  (Sir John Kerr)  No, I am sorry, I do not withdraw at all from my request for the support of the Committee. I agree with you, sir, that this is an important area.

  119.  Why did you tell me that you were quite happy with what they had in hand?
  (Sir John Kerr)  I must have expressed myself very badly. What I was trying to say was that in the BVI they have guidance in place and the legislation is not yet in place, but the legislation is in draft. In the Caymans the legislation is in draft. We would like to see that legislation pushed through their legislatures quickly and put into practice. If this Committee would recommend that, I would be extremely grateful.

  Mr Williams:  If you let us have a full note on the issue, I am sure we will give it our detailed consideration. [5]


3   Note by Witness: see Appendix 1, p. 23 (PAC99). Back

4   Note: See Appendix 1, p. 23 (PAC99). Back

5   Note: See Appendix 1, p. 23 (PAC99). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 21 May 1998