Select Committee on Public Accounts Forty-First Report


TIME AND COST OVERRUNS

i)    Time

5. The Council produced the first timetable for the Southampton Oceanography Centre project in March 1989; this forecast completion of the building in October 1993.[3] During the briefing, design and tender stages, the planned completion date was revised several times as the timetable was extended. [4] As a result construction did not start until January 1993, 15 months later than originally planned.[5] The Centre was eventually completed in August 1995, some 22 months late.[6]

6. In evidence, the Committee asked the Council why there had been such a long delay in the start of construction. The Council stated that there had been uncertainty about the financial situation. There was a coming together of funds from the Council and from Southampton University; it took a while to put that together. There was also work on developing the specification; and a period associated with making the specification fit the budget. These three events had led to the long delay.[7]

ii)  Cost

7. In January 1990 the Project Board set a budget of £48 million for the project, which the Council and the University increased in May 1991 to £48.9 million to take account of an increase in the rate of VAT. After making a series of cuts to the requirement, the Council got the estimated cost of the project to within the budget when they let the main contract in November 1992.[8]

8. The outturn may exceed the budget substantially. In March 1997 the Council's estimated cost of the project was £51.6 million, an overrun to date of £2.7 million. However Wimpey's assessment was £12.6 million higher than that. If Wimpey are successful in obtaining all or part of this amount, the cost of the project could rise to £64.2 million, a potential overrun of 30 per cent, excluding the costs of arbitration or litigation.[9] In addition the Council spent £5.1 million on the establishment of the Centre which was provided for in other budgets, mainly for staff relocation.[10]

9. The overrun of £2.7 million was largely the result of an increase in consultants' fees.[11] When asked why the cost of these fees doubled from £4.3 million to £8.6 million, the Council replied that it came about in large part through the extension of the period of development of the brief by 15 months, and because of the extension of the construction period.[12] The Council agreed that there should have been tighter control[13] and told us that they would now operate on a fixed fee basis.[14]

iii)  Conclusions

10. The Southampton Oceanography Centre was opened 22 months later than intended. As a result the scientific work which it was designed to facilitate was put back by nearly two years. The Committee regards this as an unsatisfactory outcome. We are all the more concerned that the eventual total cost of the Centre could reach £69.3 million, should Wimpey be successful in their claim against the Council.

11. We consider that, within the cost of the project, the Council should have exercised much tighter control over the cost of their consultants. We note that they would now operate on the basis of a fixed fee. Such terms would have provided the Council's consultants with an incentive to get the project completed on time.

12. The potential total cost of £69.3 million for the Centre, some 40 per cent more than the budget set for it, includes items charged to other budgets, notably for relocating the staff who were transferred to it. Since those and other costs were directly related to the project, we consider that they should have been provided for in the main budget. By allocating them elsewhere, the true cost of establishing the Centre was effectively concealed. We regard this as inconsistent with the need for full transparency and accountability.


3   C&AG's Report, paragraph 3.5 Back

4   C&AG's Report, paragraph 3.3 Back

5   C&AG's Report, paragraph 3.4 Back

6   C&AG's Report, paragraph 3.1 Back

7   Q3 Back

8   C&AG's Report, paragraph 4.1 Back

9   C&AG's Report, paragraph 4.2 and Figure 10 Back

10  C&AG's Report, Figure 11 Back

11  C&AG's Report paragraph 4.2 and Figure 10 Back

12  Q4 Back

13  Q120 Back

14   Q121 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 17 June 1998