Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of witnesses (Questions 100 - 119)

MONDAY 9 MARCH 1998

SIR JOHN BOURN, KCB, MR ANDREW TURNBULL, CB, CVO, MR BRUCE SHARPE, MR JOHN CLOUGH, MBE and MR FRANK MARTIN

  100.  Will it or will that go back into reserves and are we going to see the reserves go up?
  (Mr Turnbull)  It will mean that for the money the price per job will be lower and, therefore, within the money they will be able to afford 440,000 homes rather than 400,000.

  101.  So you can assure the Committee today that those 40,000 homes will appear, because that is the figure, rather than watching that growth of reserves going up to save for the rainy day in 2000?
  (Mr Turnbull)  This will be reflected in the number of homes done. The fee that is paid to Eaga is a fixed grant per quarter plus 2.7 something per cent of the amount of grant. The amount of grant that we are paying is still roughly £68 million, therefore the fee that they get will stay the same but they will have to administer an extra ten per cent of grant applications. That is, in a sense, one of the risks to which Eaga is exposed in a change in the scheme of that kind.

  102.  Can I ask then that you will deliver the additional 40,000 homes that have now become available through the extra finance?
  (Mr Clough)  Yes, that is our intention.

  103.  So it will happen, it will not go into reserves?
  (Mr Clough)  Our fee is based on value of grants, not number of grants. We will pursue, as we have done over the years, a very efficient operation. Our aim is to deliver as much of these funds as possible to the low income sector.

  104.  I have just got one more area. On the question of jobs on page 29 you say that one of the objectives of the whole scheme in 1990 was to create jobs in the energy efficiency industry. Page 31 shows that the number of jobs lost in that industry was exactly the same as the number you created. You failed in that objective: why?
  (Mr Turnbull)  The reduction is in the whole insulation sector, not just in the domestic insulation sector. We have created an industry that barely existed or was very small in 1991. This is simply putting it in the context of the changes that have taken place in the insulation industry as a whole. The 5,600 jobs are in the domestic sector. The reduction is in the wider insulation industry.

  105.  But in effect we have got a no increase in jobs in that sector?
  (Mr Turnbull)  In the insulation sector as a whole, but that is reflected by all sorts of things like the number of homes being built in the private sector, the amount of building going on in the economy generally.

Mr Hope:  Thank you.

Maria Eagle

  106.  Mr Clough, I wonder if you could tell me if you turn to page 15, paragraph 1.8, what the aims of NEA are?
  (Mr Clough)  Firstly, I have no connection with NEA but my knowledge of the sector extends to Neighbourhood Energy Action which is a national charity. They campaign for warmer homes.

  107.  You have no connection with them you say?
  (Mr Clough)  I have no connection apart from on a working basis NEA are very much involved in this area of work.

  108.  Does Eaga have a connection with them?
  (Mr Clough)  The only connection between Eaga and NEA is based in its constitution. As I explained previously we have a board of non-executive directors. That number was originally five, that number is now eight. Two of those non-executive directors are nominees of NEA. They do not need to be in the employ of NEA or on their governing council, they simply have to be nominations of. To take that one stage further, the two nominations made by NEA are Andrea Cook and Robert Jones. Andrea Cook is also a director of Neighbourhood Energy Action. She is the non-executive Chairman of Eaga.

  109.  So there are some links. In fact, NEA established Eaga, is that correct?
  (Mr Clough)  Yes.

  110.  That is another significant link I would have thought. In terms of membership of NEA, do they take individual members or corporate members?
  (Mr Clough)  I believe they have both.

  111.  What percentage are corporate of their membership?
  (Mr Clough)  I am sorry, I do not have that information. I am not part of NEA.

  112.  You see paragraph 1.8 says that NEA campaigns for warmer homes. If you are a company that deals with insulation one might see the point of campaigning for warmer homes, it can actually improve your business. It says that NEA has extensive contacts with installers working in the scheme, over 90 per cent of whom are NEA members.
  (Mr Clough)  Yes.

  113.  So an awful lot of your installers are NEA members.
  (Mr Clough)  Yes.

  114.  And NEA set you up to run the scheme.
  (Mr Clough)  They set us up as an entirely independent organisation.

  115.  Yes, I accept that, but there are interesting connections nonetheless, are there not?
  (Mr Clough)  Yes.

  116.  You do know what percentage of your installers are NEA members, do you?
  (Mr Clough)  No.

  117.  Do you ask them?
  (Mr Clough)  We ask them to notify us of any membership of organisations whether they be trade or otherwise and we collect that.

  118.  Can you tell us when you have checked it out?
  (Mr Clough)  Yes[4].

  119.  Also, I do not know whether or not you can find out from NEA for us what percentage of NEA members are firms who are your installers. I would be interested to know that.
  (Mr Clough)  I will certainly double check that[5].


4   Note by Witness: Our records show that 77 per cent of companies working in HEES are members of NEA. Back

5   Note: See Evidence, Appendix 1, p. 22 (PAC 221). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 24 June 1998