Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


NOTICE UNDER SECTION 56 OF THE RAILWAYS ACT 1993

South West Trains Limited

  I hereby give notice under section 56 of the Railways Act 1993 (the "Act") that I propose to make a final order under section 55 of the Act, in the form contained in the attached Schedule (the "proposed order") in relation to South West Train Limited ("SWT").

  The proposed order is to be made for the purpose of securing compliance with clause 5.3(d) of the Franchise Agreement (the "SWT" Franchise Agreement") between the Franchising Director, Stagecoach plc and SWT made on 18th December 1995. Expressions defined in the SWT Franchise Agreement have the same meaning in this Notice.

  I am minded to make the proposed order unless I am satisfied that SWT has taken steps to operate an acceptable level of train services in future. In deciding whether to make the proposed order I will consider any representations I receive. I will also consider, in particular, whether SWT has cancelled, other than by reason of Force Majeure, more than 1.5% of the train services it is scheduled to operate in the Reporting Period ending on 26 April 1997.

  SWT is likely to contravene clause 5.3(d) in that:-

    (a) on 24 October 1996 SWT notified the Franchising Director that the Actual Capacity of the trains included in its train plan for the Reporting Period ended 13 September 1996 was less than the Call-in Threshold for the aggregate Planned Capacity of each such train for that Reporting Period;

    (b) it was agreed between the Franchising Director and SWT on 14 February 1997 that SWT would be regarded as having exceeded the Call-in Threshold for Total Cancellations for the Reporting Period ended on 1 March 1997; and

    (c) by reason of cancellations of train services which have already occurred during the Reporting Period ending on 31 March 1997 and further cancellations of train services planned by SWT in that Reporting Period it is likely that Total Cancellations in that Reporting Period will exceed the Call-in Threshold of Total Cancellations for that Reporting Period;

  and accordingly it is likely that SWT will contravene clause 5.3(d) of the SWT Franchise Agreement by providing the Passenger Services under the SWT Franchise Agreement in such a manner that it will become obliged on three occasions in less than thirty nine consecutive Reporting Periods to notify the Franchising Director under Clause 5.3(d) of such failures to achieve the Call-in Thresholds for the aggregate Planned Capacity of trains or Total Cancellations.

  In setting a monetary penalty in the proposed order, which is appropriate in all the circumstances, I have had regard in particular to the level of Total Cancellations in the Reporting Period ending 1 March 1997 and the likely level of Total Cancellations in the Reporting Period ending 31 March 1997; the value of passengers' time contained in the incentive regime under Schedule 7 of the Franchise Agreements; the amount of the Franchise Payments payable to SWT; and SWT's turnover.

  Representations or objections with respect to the proposed order may be made in writing not later than 21 April 1997 to the Franchising Director at Golding's House, 2 Hay's Lane, London SE1 2HB marked "SWT representations".

Franchising Director

Office of Passenger Rail Franchising

14 March 1997

Note: clauses 5.3(c) and 5.3(d) of the SWT Franchise Agreement provide as follows:-

  5.3 (c) The Franchise Operator shall notify the Franchising Director immediately (and provide such further information and attend such meetings as he may request in relation thereto) if, in relation to the Timetable and Train Plan and any Reporting Period during the Franchise Term;

    (i) there are more Cancellations during such Reporting Period than the Call-in Threshold of Cancellations;

    (ii) there are more Total Cancellations during such Reporting Period than the Call-in Threshold of Total Cancellations; or

    (iii) where applicable, the aggregate of the Actual Capacity of each train included in the Train Plan in such Reporting Period is less than the Call-in Threshold of the aggregate of the Planned Capacity of each such train.

  5.3 (d) The Franchise Operator shall provide the Passenger Services in such a manner that, except to the extent that the Franchising Director determines, in the light of the circumstances giving rise to any obligation under Clause 5.3(c), that the occurrence of such obligation is to be disregarded for the purposes of this Clause 5.3(d), it will not be obliged to notify the Franchising Director under Clause 5.3(c) three or more times in any period of thirty-nine consecutive Reporting Periods during the Franchise Term in respect of Cancellations or Total Cancellations or Actual Capacity and the Franchise Operator being or becoming so obliged shall constitute a breach of this Franchise Agreement by the Franchise Operator.

SCHEDULE

South West Trains Limited

  Proposed order under section 55 of the Railways Act 1993

  The Franchising Director hereby, pursuant to section 55 of the Railways Act 1993, orders South West Trains Limited ("SWT"):-

    1 to provide the Passenger Services under the Franchise Agreement (the "SWT Franchise Agreement") made between the Franchising Director, Stagecoach plc and SWT on 18 December 1995 in such a manner that Total Cancellations, other than as a result of Force Majeure, for each Reporting Period ending on or before 14 September 1997, shall not exceed 2.5 per cent of trains which are scheduled to be provided under SWT's Timetable in that Reporting Period ("Total Cancellations", "Reporting Period" "Force Majeure" and "Timetable" having the same meaning as in the SWT Franchise Agreement).

    2 To pay to the Franchising Director a monetary penalty of £1,000,000.

    3 The order shall take effect on 9 May 1997.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 21 July 1998