Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


ANNEX B

COMMENTARY ON "DEPARTMENT YELLOW" RESOURCE ESTIMATE FORMAT

  B1. Schedule 1 to this Annex shows a possible layout of the resource-based Estimate of Department Yellow. Schedule 2 illustrates the corresponding forecast operating cost statement and Schedule 3 the forecast cash flow statement. The following paragraphs provide a commentary on the resource-based Estimate of Department Yellow.

Part I: ambit and voted amounts

  B2. As in existing Supply Estimates, Part I of the resource-based Estimate will contain the ambit (ie coverage) of the Estimate and list the amounts to be voted in relation to the provision in the Vote on Account previously presented to Parliament.

Part II: matrix of resource requirements

  B3. There are three separate requests for resources for the department in Part II of the Estimate. The first section of Part II is in a matrix format, with a similar structure to existing simplified Estimates. The columns are more detailed than in the Summary of Resource Outturn (Annex C schedule 1), where the FRAB suggested putting more detailed information in the notes to the accounts. In the Estimate there are three analyses of gross expenditure compared with the single figure in the accounts. The requests for resources have been subdivided into the next level of detail. Here it is assumed that the requests for resources are split along functional lines, although in some cases they might relate to the objectives which make up a departmental aim.

  B4. Columns 1-8 in the first section of Part II are expressed in accruals terms. Reading along the total line, the Estimate shows that the net resource requirement is £91.376 million, after taking account of appropriations in aid of £55.763 million. Columns 6-8 of the first section show the non-resource budget elements which go towards making the cash requirement. Appropriations in aid relating to non-operating cost items estimated at £100,000 are shown in column 8. Also shown in the right hand side columns are forecast capital expenditure and other adjustments which are itemised in the cash/resource reconciliation.

  B5. The bottom right hand corner of the matrix shows the total net cash requirement of £88.223 million, which is the limit on Supply issues from the Consolidated Fund.

  B6. Although not shown in this example, resource Estimates will include two further columns showing comparative figures for the net resource totals in the previous two years.

Part II: cash/resource reconciliation

  B7. The reconciliation between the net resource total of £91.376 million and the cash requirement of £88.223 million is shown in the second half of Part II of the Estimate. Non-cash items which were included in the resource budget are removed here: interest on capital charges of £1.85 million and depreciation of £4.603 million are subtracted from the resource budget. Capital expenditure is outside the resource budget but the cash required for capital expenditure has to be provided and this forms part of the cash requirement; so capital expenditure of £2.6 million is added. The cash effects of various adjustments relating to working capital changes (stock, debtors and creditors) and changes in provisions are shown next. The final item shown is the cash generated by the disposal of fixed assets which can be appropriated in aid of the Estimate (see column 8). This example assumes there is no difference between the cash and resource measures of this type of receipt but that will not always be the case.

  B8. The net effect of these changes is to reduce the net resource requirement to the £88.223 million cash required from the Consolidated Fund.

  B9. Thus 8 figures will be voted for Department Yellow:

    —  the accruals-based figures for net resources and appropriations in aid for each of the three requests for resources (6 figures to be Voted);

    —  the non-operating cost appropriations in aid figure of £100,000; and

    —  the total net cash requirement of £88.223 million, which is the limit on Supply issues from the Consolidated Fund.

  B10. The reason for voting separately the £100,000 is that without a Parliamentary limit on this source of income, departments could use unforeseen receipts to finance additional expenditure without further Parliamentary approval. So if Department Yellow experienced a surge in this type of income, it would as now have to present a Supplementary Estimate in order to use the additional income to finance higher expenditure.

Part III: Extra receipts payable to the Consolidated Fund

  B11. Part III of the Estimate would as now notify Parliament of the department's estimate of receipts to be paid directly to the Consolidated Fund.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 10 August 1998