Select Committee on Public Accounts Fifty-Ninth Report


HM COASTGUARD: CIVIL MARITIME SEARCH AND RESCUE

MANAGING PERFORMANCE

27. Although there is a high level of satisfaction amongst rescuers with HM Coastguard's co-ordination of search and rescue operations, the effectiveness of civil maritime search and rescue is hard to judge because of deficiencies in HM Coastguard's compilation of data on lives lost and lives saved. Moreover, there is inconsistency between HM Coastguard's operational targets and their Citizens' Charter targets.

28. We asked HM Coastguard what action they would be taking to improve the measurement and reporting of their own performance and that of the service they co-ordinate. HM Coastguard told the Committee that for the past two years they had been working with the Royal National Lifeboat Institution to produce a national database on sea-related emergencies and had together drawn up clear definitions of lives lost and lives saved. HM Coastguard had already adopted the performance indicators suggested in the Comptroller and Auditor General's Report, and had incorporated them in their capability performance indicators; these would be placed on HM Coastguard's computerised management information system which should be in operation by the beginning of 1998. They also recognised that there was an inconsistency between their Citizens' Charter target and their operational target concerning the despatch of coastal response teams, and told the Committee that this had been rectified.[26]

29. The National Audit Office had found that HM Coastguard sent rescue resources consistently quickly, and that helicopters and lifeboats generally met response standards and targets. Moreover, in the great majority of cases, they sent the right number and type of rescue resources in response to incidents. There were, however, variations between co-ordination centres, both in terms of their own performance in initiating rescues and sending coastal response teams, and in terms of the performance of the various rescuers themselves. In particular, in 1995-96 12 of the 21 co-ordination centres did not get the first member of a coastal response team to the scene within the target of 30 minutes in 90 per cent of incidents; and 18 centres did not get the first team member to all incidents within the target of one hour.[27]

Conclusions

30. Deficiencies in HM Coastguard's compilation of data have made it difficult to assess the effectiveness of civil maritime search and rescue. They have now taken action to improve the recording of lives lost and saved, and have adopted the performance measures suggested in the Comptroller and Auditor General's Report.

31. However there is still scope for better monitoring of variations in the performance of co-ordination centres and rescuers. In many areas of the country, coastal response teams failed to meet their targets for timely arrival at the scene of an incident. HM Coastguard should review the arrival performance of coastal response teams, explore the reasons for variations, and deal with those which can be improved, so as to ensure that targets are met wherever possible.


26   Qs 8-9, 11 Back

27   C&AG's Report, paras 3.14, 3.16-3.27 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 31 July 1998