Select Committee on Standards and Privileges First Report


APPENDIX 78

Letter from the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards to Mr Ian Greer

  As part of your evidence to the inquiry you have supplied me with a transcript of a taped telephone conversation between yourself and Mr. Royston Webb when Mr Webb was in the Middle East in October 1994. Mr Webb had told me that a second telephone conversation on the same subject took place between you and him a few days later, after his return to London. Is a transcript available of that conversation? If so, may I please have a copy? If not, I would be interested in your explanation as to why the first conversation was recorded but not the second, or as to why a tape or transcript no longer exists of the second conversation.

  An early reply would be appreciated.

Sir Gordon Downey

27 February 1997

Letter from Mr Ian Greer to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards

  Thank you for your letter of 27 February.

  Mr Webb is quite right. There were two telephone conversations. Both took place whilst Mr Webb was in Dubai, fighting allegations in defence of Mr Fayed, who was accused of bribery and corruption.

  The first conversation took place prior to the conversation of which you have the transcript. I made the call to him on both occasions. On the first occasion, it was a relatively brief discussion, when I expressed my horror at the untrue and astonishing allegations that were being made by Mr Fayed. In the course of the short discussion, Mr Webb made it clear that that he knew of no financial arrangement that Mr Fayed had entered into with any Member of Parliament or myself.

  I informed my solicitors, Carter Ruck, of the conversation that had taken place and they urged me to speak to him again and to tape the conversation, which I did. It is not my practice to tape telephone conversations.

  No discussions whatsoever have taken place with Mr Webb since that day. My company issued proceedings against The Guardian and it was clear that Mr Fayed was the source of the story. It would therefore have been quite improper for me to speak to him and vice versa. Indeed, my lawyers would have cautioned against it.

  It would appear that Mr Webb is cleverly mixing fact and fiction again, which I imagine is not surprising, as he is still employed by Mr Fayed/Harrods.

Ian Greer

28 February 1997


 
previous page contents next page
House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1997
Prepared 8 July 1997