Select Committee on Welsh Affairs First Special Report




ANNEX

Letter from the Welsh Office to the Clerk of the Committee

Welsh Affairs Committee Third Report: The Preservation of Historical Buildings and Ancient Monuments: Follow Up

Introduction

1. The Welsh Office welcomes the Select Committee's continuing interest in arrangements for the preservation of historic buildings and ancient monuments in Wales. The Department believes that the Committee's original inquiry in 1993, its subsequent report and the Government's response did much to raise their profile and contributed to a broader public understanding of the issues. The Department also appreciates the Committee's acknowledgement of progress made on a number of fronts and shares many of the Committee's views on other issues identified in the Committee's report.

Listing - progress of the resurvey

2. The Department is pleased that the Committee was able to congratulate Cadw on the acceleration of the listing resurvey. The Department notes that the Committee remains of the view that the task should be completed in three years but believes that the incremental approach adopted, set alongside issues such as quality control, resources, and the availability of experienced contractors to conduct fieldwork will see the resurvey most effectively completed.

3. Meanwhile the Department can assure the Committee that effective arrangements remain in place for the urgent evaluation of any threatened structures. Cadw continues to consider urgently requests that buildings should be spot-listed when there is an identifiable threat, and resources available for this work have not been reduced. Cadw has spot-listed fewer buildings in the period 1994-96 than the period 1990-93, but the total number of candidate buildings for spot-listing diminishes as the resurvey progresses.

Listing - criteria for selection

4. The Committee noted concerns that the criteria used to identify buildings of special architectural or historic interest in Wales are conditioned by English perceptions. The Committee has recommended that the listing process should acknowledge the importance of buildings linked with people significant in Welsh history, whether or not they are of architectural interest, and be sensitive to Welsh culture in its broadest terms.

5. The Department recognises the need to ensure that the listing criteria offers proper protection to characteristic Welsh buildings and acknowledges the importance of historical association. They presently state that where otherwise unremarkable buildings have such associations, listing is likely to be appropriate only in exceptional cases. Although this criterion has been met in Wales in a number of cases, the Department accepts the need for sensitivity to Welsh culture at all times and proposes to revise the criteria, so that while they will continue to require a significant historical connection no presumption will be made that only a small minority of buildings will qualify for protection.

Chapels and Churches

6. The Department shares the Committee's view that the listing of chapels is an important component of the national resurvey and recognises the valuable part played by chapels in Welsh social and economic development. For this reason, in letting contracts for the community-based surveys, priority has been given to areas which are rich in chapel buildings, and it is probable that about half the number which will merit listing have already been listed. However, rather than wait for the end of the general resurvey before completing coverage of chapels, the Department will undertake a 'thematic' survey of chapels in those communities for which general lists are not in place or contracted. The Department aims to let a contract within six months and complete the project within a further two years.

7. The Department notes the Committee's view that too few chapels are being listed, particularly at the higher grades, in comparison to churches. But it can be misleading to draw a comparison between the number of chapels and churches listed. The listing criteria recognise that the older a building is, and the fewer the surviving examples of its type, the more likely it is to justify listing. In general, churches in Wales pre-date the chapels and many are medieval or several centuries old. All buildings built before 1700 which survive in anything like their original condition are listed. For the period after 1840, during which the majority of chapels were built, the criteria recognise that greater selection is necessary. The same principles are applied to both churches and chapels, and in fact only two Victorian churches in the whole of Wales are currently listed at Grade I compared with a significantly larger number of higher graded chapels. Among the total number of chapels surveyed so far, 11 have been listed Grade I, 28 Grade II* and 500 Grade II. This distribution (roughly 2% Grade I and 5% Grade II*) conforms very closely with the distribution of grades across all buildings which have been listed in Wales.

8. The Department would like to echo the welcome which the Committee has extended to the establishment of a Redundant Churches Fund. The Department would also like to record its appreciation for the collaboration of the Church in Wales in this respect and offer its thanks to the Friends of Friendless Churches. This body will have lead responsibility for the care of those churches vested in the new Fund.

9. The Department shares the Committee's disappointment that a mechanism to care for the best of redundant chapels continues to elude those committed to this important area. The need for such a mechanism is accepted and the Department is willing to provide generous levels of financial support. However, the Department strongly believes that continuing success would be better assured if such a mechanism enjoyed from the outset the leadership of the voluntary sector, especially those voluntary groups whose commitment and enthusiasm would certainly be needed to sustain it. In this respect the Department is seeking a solution along similar lines to that agreed between Cadw, the Church in Wales and the Friends of Friendless Churches, although in the absence of a financial contribution from the denominations the new body will have more fund-raising to do. Equally, the Department believes that such a mechanism should concentrate on preserving the best rather than trying to address questions of widespread redundancy among the stock of chapels. Those questions are real, but should not cloud the objective of ensuring that the best redundant examples of Wales' Non-Conformist past continue to be available to be enjoyed by future generations.

Conservation Areas and Town Schemes

10. The Department shares the Committee's view that the designation of conservation areas and the creation of town schemes can make a striking contribution to the built environment. Cadw and representatives of the local authorities met in March to discuss ways of promoting and sustaining such initiatives and both are considering how a fresh impetus might be given to such programmes.

Improvement Grants

11. The Department recognises that improvement grants have the potential for making a negative impact upon the historic environment, but does not believe that this need be (or generally is) the case. New guidance to local authorities has recently been issued by the Housing Division of the Welsh Office, and Cadw has emphasised to local authorities the need for close collaboration between those involved in both conservation and regeneration.

Building Preservation TrustsBuilding Preservation Trusts

12. The Department agrees that building preservation trusts have a valuable role to play in the preservation of individual buildings at risk. While the number of trusts (and completed projects) in Wales remains modest, the Department believes that - through the resources which it has provided to the Architectural Heritage Fund (AHF) and the information work upon which it is engaged - a platform for real progress has been established. In February Cadw joined an all-Wales meeting of the Association of Building Preservation Trusts hosted by the AHF at which local and national groups were able to exchange views and plan further development. Cadw has since emphasised to local authorities the potential benefits which collaboration with a building preservation trust can reap. To be effective a trust needs to be the product of voluntary action, often drawing on local enthusiasm and commitment, and delivery of a numerical target could not be guaranteed, but Cadw will seek further progress in this area.

Ancient Monuments

13. The identification of monuments for scheduling under the provisions of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 remains an important task for Cadw. It is a priority for Cadw's own team of Inspectors but in addition the agency will continue to look to the four Welsh Archaeological Trusts and the Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Wales (RCAHMW) for assistance with this work.

The Record

14. The Committee notes concerns over the adequacy of funding provided by the RCAHMW for the maintenance of the Sites and Monuments Records (SMRs) of the Welsh Archaeological Trusts. The Department recognises that the Trusts are continuing to seek additional funds for this work. However, it feels that the trebling of funding over the last three years, facilitating the employment of additional staff, has greatly increased the overall level of activity in this area and has put this work on an equal footing with other activities which make a call on the Royal Commission's resources.

15. As the Committee recognises, the proposal to give English local authorities a statutory duty to maintain the SMRs reflects different arrangements between England and Wales. In England the SMRs are currently the responsibility of local authorities but in Wales they are maintained by the Trusts which are independent charitable bodies. However, like their counterparts in England the Welsh SMRs are an essential source of necessary information for the fulfilment of statutory duties. Indeed, the Department has recently encouraged Welsh local authorities to formally adopt the Trusts' SMRs for planning purposes.

16. The Department acknowledges that the use of digital mapping has advantages for a range of tasks including the development of the SMRs. However, the initial and ongoing resource costs of using digital data are high. Potential digital data users need to identify the tasks which would benefit from its use together with the digitised products which would best serve their needs. Negotiations with the suppliers of digital mapping can ascertain the costs of supplying the required product. Only then can the additional costs, over and above the current costs of undertaking the work without digitised mapping, be calculated and set against the benefits.

17. The Department is negotiating a service level agreement with Ordnance Survey covering the supply and maintenance of digitised maps. Those agencies and non-departmental public bodies wishing to be party to this arrangement would be expected to contribute to the cost. The Department is also involved in discussions with a number of other Government Departments and agencies examining the feasibility of a consortium service level agreement with Ordnance Survey for the purchase and maintenance of digital mapping.

18. The key issue is financial and turns upon the amounts which consortium partners are prepared to contribute. The general position is that current expenditure on mapping (largely conventional products) by the relevant organisations is modest and the financial costs of moving to digital mapping are significant. There is a considerable gap between what organisations in the Welsh Office consortium are currently prepared to contribute and the sum that would be necessary to deliver the service. Until that gap is reduced an agreement in unlikely. Nevertheless the Department will continue to work to provide a service that will meet needs at a price that will match the benefits to be gained.

Historic Landscapes, Parks and Gardens

19. Since the Committee's last report, Cadw has been working closely with the Countryside Council for Wales and the International Council of Monuments and Sites to compile an advisory register of landscapes of historic interest in Wales. This work has also involved the Welsh Archaeological Trusts, the Royal Commission and local authority representatives. In addition, discussions have taken place with landowners and the farming community. The Department notes the Committee's view that Cadw should reinforce its role in the integrated protection of the wider historic landscape in Wales, and believes that the completion of the Register will provide the means of achieving this.

Cadw

20. As the Committee knows, Cadw's status as an agency of the Welsh Office means that it is directly responsible to Ministers. It acts with their authority, is bound by Government policy and (in matters of policy advice) principles of confidentiality. However, Cadw is well placed to contribute to the interests of the built heritage in Wales through the advice which it can put directly to Ministers and is free to inform planning inquiries. The agency is adequately staffed to fulfil its statutory duties and to manage budgets which - allowing for differences in size between Wales and England and Scotland - are comparable to those deployed in other parts of the United Kingdom. But since they are inevitably smaller in absolute terms, Cadw must take particular care to control its organisational and overhead costs. While the creation of an office in North Wales (or other parts of the Principality) would not be advisable for these reasons, Cadw staff (professional and administrative) travel widely, visiting local authorities to discuss statutory matters and all applicants for grant as a matter of course. The agency's principal tasks are encapsulated in the performance targets, many of which include measures of timeliness - and in 1996-97 all agency targets were met.

21. The reduction in the number of professional staff was a temporary interlude following two retirements. Replacements have now been appointed, and the number of professional staff in Cadw has never have been higher - although total manpower has been falling because of reductions in administrative staff. The Committee deduced from Cadw's 1995-96 Annual Report that during that period the agency had 95 administrative staff but only 11 professional advisory staff. However, the latter described only the professional officers in the Inspectorate of Ancient Monuments and Historic Buildings. Cadw's architects and others with professional qualifications were counted among the 82 industrial staff also identified in the Report. Currently there are 33 archaeologists, architects, architectural historians and staff with comparable professional expertise in Cadw and 60 administrative staff. The balance in a total complement of 190 is composed of 65 craftsmen (such as masons and joiners) and 32 permanent custodians (supplemented by seasonal recruits).

22. As already noted, Cadw must marshal its resources and bring them to bear wherever it can do so cost effectively - often in support of local initiatives. However, developments such as the formation of the Heritage Forum and the forging of stronger links with key organisations such as the Architectural Heritage Fund and the Historic Houses Association will better enable Cadw to supplement its statutory duties by offering strategic advice on future directions.

Local Government Reorganisation

23. The Department agrees with the Committee that all of the new local authorities need competent staff versed in the issues of conservation in order to carry out their duties, and Cadw has renewed its offer to receive local authority personnel on visits and short placements as a contribution to their training.

Planning Policy Guidance

24. The Department is pleased to have been able to supplement its central guidance on built heritage issues with Circulars 61/96 and 60/96. Their presentation reflects the advice received during the course of consultation.

National Lottery

25. The Department is very conscious of the new opportunities presented by Lottery funding and Cadw in its advisory role to the Heritage Lottery Fund is anxious to promote Welsh interests. The Department notes the Committee's concerns that Lottery funding should not displace Government funding, and is able to confirm that the principle of additionality remains a central tenet of the Heritage Lottery Fund.



 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1997
Prepared 17 November 1997