Select Committee on Welsh Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum Submitted by the Farmers' Union of Wales

THE CRISIS IN THE WELSH AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRY

INTRODUCTION

  In view of the difficulties currently prevailing in the Welsh agricultural industry, the Farmers' Union of Wales welcomes the swift response of the Welsh Affairs Select Committee to undertake this inquiry.

  Eighty per cent of Wales is designated by the EU, in recognition of the permanent hardships it contends with, as less favoured. This evidence, because of the need for an early response, relates largely to the beef, sheep and milk sectors, which, in 1996, accounted for 87 per cent of the gross output of Welsh agriculture. Other sectors, contributing rather less to the output of Welsh agiculture but which are nonetheless very significant to more localised economies, have been similarly badly affected.

  The Welsh agricultural industry is based on traditional family farms where the scope to diversify is at best limited and where the scale of enterprise tends to be below the GB average, thus reflecting in relatively low net farm income levels. In 1995-96, 40 per cent of Welsh cattle and sheep farms in the LFA returned incomes below £10,000. There is no "slack" in the system for hill or lowland farmers to further "tighten their belts".

  The industry's current profound difficulties are the result of a combination of factors. The strength of the £—which encourages imports, hinders exports and reduces both support and compensatory measures prescribed in terms of ECUs—and the continuing ban on British beef exports. These two facets, because of the supply position they create, are resulting in low market returns to dairy and livestock producers. Set against this are increased and additional input costs, and the removal of compensatory measures designed to mitigate particularly the problems caused for farmers by BSE control measures. The combination of reduced market realisations on the one hand, set against increased costs on the other, has resulted in a very marked deterioration in net farm income with which the farmer has to support himself and his family, meet interest repayments, and invest in the holding. The current position is not tenable.

THE PROBLEMS

(i)   Beef imports

  The appreciation of sterling which has had the effect of reducing to the UK the price of beef from France Eire and Holland by 12 per cent, 14 per cent and 14 per cent respectively, has stimulated increased imports, with the Wesh beef sector being adversely affected. Between January and August 1997, imports of beef from other EU member states increased by 63 per cent (Appendix A). Imports from Eire, which are giving rise to so much concern, rose during this period by 78 per cent, increasing from 17,588 tonnes to 31,384 tonnes. Imports from Third Countries were down marginally (-6 per cent), leaving a net import position of beef supplies of +23 per cent. Given that the ban on UK beef exports is continuing, which, under normal trading conditions, would have taken about 25 per cent of domestic supplies off the home market, the supply consequences become very apparent.

(ii)   Sheep exports

  The Welsh sheep sector is heavily reliant on the export market. The strength of the £ has undermined the competitivity of domestic sheep exports, particularly to other Member States. Total mutton and lamb exports this year between January and October were 14.9 per cent below the level for the same period in 1997 (Appendix B).

(iii)   Trade in dairy products

  The strength of the £ has resulted in similar trading difficulties for milk producers on the milk product markets.

(iv)   BSE

  The closure of the export market for British beef supplies has exacerbated a difficult supply position, particularly given the increasing attractiveness of the dometic market for imports. The difficulties have not, however, been confined to the beef sector, and manufacturers of domestically-produced dairy products have had difficulty in maintaining market share due to scientifically unfounded concern over the safety of home-produced dairy products. The closure of the export market impacted particularly badly on the export market for veal calves derived primarily from the dairy herd.

  Both the beef and dairy sectors have been badly hit by decisions to reduce the basic level of compensation under the Over Thirty Months Scheme, and a combination of basic rate cuts in tandem with Green currency revaluations has cut the ceiling on support under this scheme from £513 when initially introduced to just £311.

(v)   Market realisations

  Agri-monetary changes and their impact on imports/exports, in tandem with BSE, have resulted in reduced market realisations. Cattle prices in Wales in November 1997, at 90.87 p/kg, were 26.9 per cent below market realisations in November 1995 (Appendix C) (1996 figures were distorted by BSE). Lamb prices in Wales, by November 1997, had fallen to 13 per cent below levels prevailing in November 1996 (Appendix D), and farm-gate milk prices in October 1997, at 20.72ppl, were 19 per cent below 1996 levels (Annex E).

  Whilst in previous years there has been an element of cross-subsidisation by one sector for another, which has enabled mixed enterprise farms to get by, this year the three main enterprise types have witnessed a dramatic fall in market returns.

(vi)   Input costs

  Set against significantly poorer returns for beef, lamb and milk have been increased input costs over and above those which would "normally" be associated with agricultural production. The removal of the rendering subsidy, the absorption of SRM inspection costs, the costs of the cattle movement database, and double-tagging (Appendix F) all look set to be foisted on an industry struggling to remain viable. These additional costs will amount to an increase in the cattle cost structure of around £38.00 per head and of around £3.00 per head on sheep.

(vii)   Support/compensatory measures

  A reference has been made to the effect of the strength of the £ on trading conditions. Because of the sharp appreciation of Sterling, the Green £ has had to be revalued on no less than six occasions since June 1996. In January 1997, SAPS, BSP and SCP payments were all reduced by 5.4 per cent due to the application of a revised Green rate, to which the UK industry was supposed to be locked into until 1999. a further 3-4 per cent cut is imminent as from January 1998 if, as currently looks the case, the value of Sterling breaches the prescribed leeway of 11.5 per cent.

  Intervention support has been reduced by 18.8 per cent. A raft of measures designed to mitigate the consequences of BSE have not been renewed despite weaker market realisations for much of 1997, than prevailed in 1996 (Appendix G).

(viii)   Green £ compensation

  It is a matter of profound concern to the FUW that successive UK Governments have failed to pursue resources available to compensate for the adverse consequences of Green currency revaluation and which have been set aside by the EU for the UK. A compensation fund of £980 million is available to the UK,50 per cent of which could be sourced with "top-up". The Fontainbleu Agreement, under which the UK Government would have to contribute 71p for every £1.00 sourced, is inhibiting uptake. All other member states which have had to revalue their Green currencies have taken up compensation available, and thus UK farmers have again been left at a competitive disadvantage in a so-called "single market".

(ix)   Consistency of EU standards

  There is concern that the products being imported into the UK, and particularly beef, are not conforming to the stringent and high standards required of home-produced beef. Since inspection at ports would run counter to the terms of the operation of the EU single market, it becomes the responsibility of the importing company to ensure that the regulations are complied with. Whilst current legislation requires that all beef sold for human consumpton be under 30 months of age, it does not forbid entry of such product. In de-boned form, particularly, it would be difficult to establish the age of such meat.

CONCLUSION

  The difficulties facing the Welsh livestock and milk sectors are irrefutable. These difficulties lie outwith the industry's ability to redress them and, as such, the FUW believes that the Government, if it wishes to retain a viable agricultutral industry in Wales, and upon which the wider the wide rural economy and the maintenance of the countryside is dependent, must recognise these difficulties and take suitable action to prevent the irrevocable damage that will otherwise ensue. This assistance should take the form of agri-monetary compensation, reasonable compensation for the consequences of BSE measures imposed by Government on the industry, and support for Wales' hill and upland areas. Unless assistance is forthcoming in the short-term, the future of the industry in the longer-term will be severely jeopardised.

15 December 1997


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 12 February 1998