House of Commons - Explanatory Note
          
House of Commons
Session 1998-99
Publications on the internet
Other Bills before Parliament
Arrangement of Clauses (Contents)

Road Traffic (Vehicle Testing) Bill


 

These notes refer to the Road Traffic (Vehicle Testing) Bill
as introduced in the House of Commons on 13th January 1999 [Bill 25].

ROAD TRAFFIC (VEHICLE TESTING) BILL

________________

EXPLANATORY NOTES

INTRODUCTION

1.     These explanatory notes relate to the Road Traffic (Vehicle Testing) Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 13 January 1999. They have been provided by the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions with the consent of Mr Andrew Hunter MP, the member in charge of the Bill, in order to assist the reader of the Bill and to help inform debate on it. They do not form part of the Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament.

2.     These notes need to be read in conjunction with the Bill. They are not, and are not meant to be, a comprehensive description of the Bill. So where a clause or part of a clause does not seem to require any explanation or comment, none is given.

SUMMARY

3.     The main purpose of the Bill is to provide a statutory framework for the establishment of a central computer database of the MOT test status of vehicles. This is intended to aid enforcement and facilitate the option of introducing paperless vehicle relicensing. The Bill also enables information on the database to be sold to help offset the cost of introducing computerisation into the scheme.

BACKGROUND

4.      Sections 45 and 46 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 provide for what is generally known as the MOT test.

5.      The Vehicle Inspectorate, an Executive Agency of the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, has responsibility for ensuring compliance with standards of vehicle roadworthiness in Great Britain. The Inspectorate has embarked on a project to create a computer link with the 19,000 or so MOT testing stations to enable the results of individual MOT tests to be fed into a central database. It is intended that the database should be established under a public/private partnership contract.

6.     One aim of the computerisation project is to improve the Inspectorate's control of testing standards by enabling them more easily to detect any MOT testing stations with an abnormal pattern of test results. In addition, the database will enable the Secretary of State to accumulate more comprehensive and authoritative statistical data on trends of vehicle roadworthiness to assist in policy formulation.

7.     Enabling legislation is not required to undertake the computerisation project. However, there are three main areas where the existing legislation imposes constraints on the project:

  • the way the Government enforces the requirement to have a valid MOT test certificate;
  • the way in which the Vehicle Inspectorate recovers the cost of supervising the MOT scheme; and
  • the scope for using data collected in MOT tests.

THE BILL

8.     The principal purpose of the Bill is to amend the provisions of Part II of the Road Traffic Act 1988 relating to the testing of vehicles other than heavy goods vehicles.

9.     The Bill makes provision for the establishment of a central computer database of the MOT test status of vehicles. The database may be used:

  • to aid enforcement;
  • to make it easier to introduce paperless vehicle relicensing;
  • to enable the Secretary of State to make particulars in the records available to interested parties.

Additionally, the provisions clarify the legal status of persons authorised to supervise or carry out MOT tests.

COMMENTARY ON CLAUSES

Clause 1: Tests of satisfactory condition of vehicles

10.     The existing primary legislation does not refer to "nominated testers", although in practice it is they who carry out most MOT tests. This clause puts nominated testers on a statutory basis (see clause 1(1)(a)). It also provides for nominated testers and inspectors, whose names are put forward by authorised examiners and designated councils respectively, to be approved by the Secretary of State (see clause 1(1)(a) and (b)).

11.     Clause 1(3) inserts section 45(6A) and (6B) of the Road Traffic Act 1988. Subsection (6A) enables the Secretary of State to provide, or make arrangements for the provision of, courses of instruction in connection with MOT testing, as he does at present under administrative arrangements. It also enables him to charge fees for attendance on such courses. This is a new provision designed to make those who benefit from the courses responsible for paying for them. Subsection (6B) requires the Secretary of State to establish and maintain records relating to MOT tests.

Clause 2: Regulations under section 45

12.     This clause substitutes a new section 46 in the Road Traffic Act 1988. The new section re-enacts the existing provisions and adds further provisions.

13.     The principal new provisions are as follows.

  • Subsections (1)(e) and (3) enable the Secretary of State to make provision for supervision of MOT testing stations. He may, in particular, provide for a person to be made a nominated supervisor for a testing station. This power would be useful where, for example, an authorised examiner has several testing stations and cannot be present at all of them.

  • Subsection (1)(i) enables the Secretary of State to provide in regulations for factual errors in MOT test certificates to be corrected.

  • Subsections (1)(j) and (4) deal with the charges payable to the Secretary of State by authorised examiners or designated councils on the issue of the result of an MOT test; on issue of duplicates or copies of test certificates; and on the correction of errors in test certificates. Subsection (4)(a) enables the Secretary of State to require payment on account from authorised examiners and designated councils for entering the results of MOT tests into the proposed MOT database. The provision would also enable the Secretary of State to require payment on account at prescribed times of such amounts as he may determine in accordance with the regulations. Subsection (4)(b) reproduces part of existing section 46(d). The Secretary of State may charge for supplying, in advance of MOT tests, blank forms for test certificates and notifications of refusal of test certificates. Subsection (4) also provides for money paid on account to be repaid in prescribed circumstances.

  • Subsection (2) enables the Secretary of State to require that persons connected with MOT testing should successfully complete training courses and pay such fees as may be prescribed in connection with applications for the Secretary of State's authorisation, approval or designation.

  • Subsection (5) enables the Secretary of State to make information available from the MOT records to prescribed persons on payment, in prescribed cases, of a reasonable fee. This provision would allow the Secretary of State to disclose information from the MOT database in accordance with regulations. It is envisaged that regulations could provide, for example, for:
    • the issue, on payment of a reasonable fee, of particulars relating to a vehicle's MOT history to a person who could demonstrate that he had reasonable cause for wanting such information; and
    • the issue to the police of information relating to the MOT status of vehicles (free of charge and via the Police National Computer).

  • Subsection (6) enables the Secretary of State to sell particulars contained in, or derived from, the MOT records. The particulars and information could be sold:
    • to such persons as the Secretary of State thought fit;

    • for such price, on such terms and subject to such restrictions as the Secretary of State thought fit; and

    • without identifying the premises at which an examination was carried out or any person concerned with the carrying out of an examination.

Clause 3: Use of records relating to vehicle examinations, etc.

14.     This clause inserts a new section 46A of the Road Traffic Act 1998. It describes how the Secretary of State may use the records in the proposed MOT database and the database of vehicle records held by the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA).

15.     Subsection (2) allows the Secretary of State to use information from either of the databases to check the accuracy of the information in the other database and, where appropriate, to amend or supplement the information contained in the other database.

16.     Subsection (3) provides for the Secretary of State to use information from the DVLA database to promote compliance with the requirement to have a valid MOT certificate. This could include the sending out of reminders to registered keepers that their vehicles might need MOT tests.

Clause 4: Evidence from records

17.     This clause inserts a new section 46B of the Road Traffic Act 1988.

18.     At present, a vehicle's MOT status is usually proved by producing an MOT certificate. In future, it will be possible to use records from the proposed MOT database. Clause 4 makes provision for admitting evidence from those records in court.

Clause 5: Conditions for grant of vehicle excise licence

19.     Clause 5 adds paragraph (aa) to section 66(2) of the Road Traffic Act 1988. Under this provision, a vehicle may be relicensed without producing an MOT certificate, because the Secretary of State may use information from the proposed MOT database.

Clause 6: Orders relating to fees

20.     Clause 6 refers to section 102 of the Finance (No. 2) Act 1987 which enables a Minister of the Crown, by order, to specify what matters are to be taken into account when fixing fees and charges. Such an order requires affirmative procedure in the Commons. The Department of Transport (Fees) Order 1988 (SI 1988/643) includes a provision relating to fees chargeable by virtue of section 46 of the Road Traffic Act 1988. It will require amendment as a result of the Bill. This clause enables an order which relates only to section 46, and which is made within twelve months after Royal Assent, to be made subject to negative procedure.

Clause 9: Short title, commencement and extent

21.     Clause 9(2) requires the Secretary of State, except in relation to clauses 6, 8 and 9, to make a commencement order to bring the provisions of the Bill into effect. Clauses 6, 8 and 9 will come into force on Royal Assent. Clause 9(3) enables a commencement order relating to clause 1 to include transitional provisions, consequential provisions or savings.

Schedule

22.     The schedule makes consequential amendments. Paragraphs 1 and 2 amend sections 8 and 10 of the Transport Act 1982, which affect sections 45 and 46 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 and are not yet in force. Paragraph 3 extends the offence of impersonation in section 177 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 to cover the impersonation of any of those who, under sections 45 and 46 as amended by the Bill, are entitled to carry out MOT tests.

EFFECTS OF THE BILL ON PUBLIC SECTOR FINANCES

23.     The cost of computerising the MOT testing scheme under the provisions of the Bill is likely to be approximately £22 million per annum. However, most aspects of computerisation could have been effected under the existing legislation, so it is likely that a significant part of this cost would have been incurred in any event.

24.     It is expected that the increased expenditure will be met by a corresponding increase in the charges payable to the Secretary of State by the persons carrying out MOT tests and that there will also be a corresponding increase in the fees payable by persons presenting vehicles for testing. It is estimated that the cost of obtaining a test certificate (currently prescribed under regulation 20 of the Motor Vehicles (Tests) Regulations 1981 to be a maximum of £30.87 in the case of a car) will increase by approximately £1.00.

EFFECT OF THE BILL ON PUBLIC SERVICE MANPOWER

25.     The provision of the Bill will impose no significant additional manpower implications.

SUMMARY OF REGULATORY IMPACT ASSESSMENT

26.     The principal businesses affected by the Bill will be those carrying out MOT testing in the private sector - some 19,000 garages. The main cost burdens on them would be the requirement to pay for the cost of training. This equates to a current cost of around £200-300 which at present is borne directly by the public rather than by those who are seeking to set up, and by those who run, MOT testing stations. The Bill will not impose any direct burdens on any other business, charities or voluntary bodies.

27.     It is estimated that the cost of introducing computerisation into the MOT testing scheme will add approximately £1.00 to the fee for obtaining an MOT test certificate. Fees for certificates are paid to authorised examiners and designated councils and passed on by them to the Secretary of State. Since some 22 million MOT test passes are registered annually, the fee increase will generate sufficient income to enable the Vehicle Inspectorate to pay for the cost of introducing computerisation into the MOT scheme. The provisions in this Bill relating to the uses to which data could be put will serve to reduce that cost because part of any income from the sale of data would be used to help offset the cost of introducing computerisation into the scheme. Potential income from the sale of data would therefore, indirectly, help to keep down the fee for an MOT certificate.

COMMENCEMENT

28.     Clauses 6, 8 and 9 come into force on Royal Assent. The other provisions of the Bill will come into force on a day or days appointed by the Secretary of State.

 
 
contents  
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries ordering


© Parliamentary copyright 1999
Prepared: 26 february 1999