Previous Section Index Home Page


LORD CHANCELLOR'S DEPARTMENT

Staff (Ethnic Origin)

Mr. Vaz: To ask the Minister of State, Lord Chancellor's Department if he will provide a breakdown by ethnic origin and grade of (1) the judiciary, (2) members of tribunals and (3) the magistracy. [79049]

Mr. Hoon: The available information is as follows: (1) The Judiciary: the figures for the ethnic origin of judges are believed to be correct, but as the ethnic origin of candidates for judicial office was not sought before October 1991, the data may be incomplete. (see table).

31 Mar 1999 : Column: 769

2. Tribunals: this information is only available for the Employment Tribunal and Social Security Appeals Tribunal where it has been collected on the same basis as for the judiciary since October 1991. It is set out below. Information in respect of other tribunals has only been collected on a consistent basis since 1998. (see table).

31 Mar 1999 : Column: 770

3. Magistracy: complete information is not readily available. It is held on individual records and not yet collated centrally. It could therefore only be provided at disproportionate cost. However, an ethnicity questionnaire was sent out to Lay Magistrates in England and Wales (excluding the Duchy of Lancaster) in May 1997 to which there was a 93 per cent. response rate. The details are set out in the table.

31 Mar 1999 : Column: 769

Table 1. The Judiciary
Judges of ethnic minority origin as at 1 March 1999

PostBlackAsianOther non whiteTotal% Ethnic minorities
Lords of Appeal in Ordinary------12--
Lords Justices of Appeal------35--
High Court Judges------98--
Circuit Judges--325620.9
Recorders5448791.5
Assistant Recorders5543853.6
District Judges2737411.6
Stipendiary Magistrates--2--932.2
Acting Stipendiary Magistrates2--2964.2

Note:

The statistics have only been recorded since October 1991


31 Mar 1999 : Column: 769

Table 2. Tribunals
Employment Tribunal and Social Security Appeals Tribunal Chairmen of ethnic minority origin as at 1 March 1999

PostBlackAsianOther non whiteTotal% ethnic minorities
Chairman of Employment Tribunals (full time)13--844.8
Chairman of Employment Tribunals (part time)2112052.0
Full time Chairman of Social Security Appeals Tribunals1--1543.7
Part time Chairman of Social Security Appeals Tribunals4615322.1

Note:

The statistics have only been recorded since October 1991


31 Mar 1999 : Column: 769

31 Mar 1999 : Column: 769

Table 3. Magistrates in post at May 1997
Lay Magistrates (excluding the Duchy of Lancaster): Analysis of the Public Appointments and Equal Opportunities Survey-- as at 12 May 1997

PostBlackAsianOther non whiteTotal% ethnic minority
Magistrates in post as at May 199737446518723,4614.4

Note:

There were 25,124 Lay Magistrates in post (excluding the Duchy of Lancaster) at May 1997. 1,663 did not return their questionnaire


31 Mar 1999 : Column: 769

31 Mar 1999 : Column: 769

Task Forces

Dr. Tony Wright: To ask the Minister of State, Lord Chancellor's Department if he will list all those task forces and policy reviews with external members

31 Mar 1999 : Column: 770

established by his Department since May 1997 which have set up (a) sub-groups, (b) working parties and (c) other subsidiary committees. [79261]

Mr. Hoon: The information requested is set out in the table.

31 Mar 1999 : Column: 769

Reviews and Task Forces

Review/Task forceOther subsidiary committee
Review of Enforcement of Civil Court JudgmentsPanels of Experts:
General cross-cutting issues
Oral examinations/judgment summons
Attachment of Earnings/Charging Orders/Garnishee Orders
Warrants and Writs
Quality Task Force

Note: 3 working groups set up


31 Mar 1999 : Column: 769

Dr. Tony Wright: To ask the Minister of State, Lord Chancellor's Department if he will list for all task forces and policy reviews with external members established by his Department since May 1997 (a) their dates of establishment, (b) those which have issued final

31 Mar 1999 : Column: 770

reports and their dates of publication, (c) those which have been terminated and their dates of termination and (d) for those bodies still in existence, expected reporting and termination dates. [79273]

31 Mar 1999 : Column: 771

Mr. Hoon: The information requested is set out in the table.

31 Mar 1999 : Column: 772

Reviews and Task Forces

Review/Task ForceDate of establishmentAnticipated Report and Termination Date
Review of the Lord Chancellor's Department Funding for Marriage Support and Research ServicesNovember 1998Report due 31 March 1999 termination due 31 March 1999
Review of Enforcement of Civil Court JudgmentsMarch 1998First report due June 2000 termination unknown
Quality Task ForceFebruary 1999Expected to report to the Lord Chancellor by end of 1999 termination due end 1999
Review of Crown Office ListMarch 1999Expected to report to the Lord Chancellor by end 1999 termination due end 1999

31 Mar 1999 : Column: 771

31 Mar 1999 : Column: 771

Bus Employees

Mr. Bob Russell: To ask the Minister of State, Lord Chancellor's Department how much his Department spent on legal fees including those of the BEST trustees relating to the Bus Employees Superannuation Trust, (a) in total and (b) in connection with the High Court hearing of 1 March. [79541]

Mr. Hoon: None.

31 Mar 1999 : Column: 772

Performance Targets

Jacqui Smith: To ask the Minister of State, Lord Chancellor's Department what are the key performance targets for Her Majesty's Land Registry, the Public Record Office, the Public Trust Office and the Court Service executive agencies for 1999-2000. [79852]

Mr. Hoon: The following tables set out the key performance targets that the Lord Chancellor has set for, Her Majesty's Land Registry, the Public Record Office, the Public Trust Office and the Court Service for 1999-2000.

31 Mar 1999 : Column: 771

HM Land Registry Key Performance Indicators and Targets 1999-2000

Indicator FinancialTarget
Percentage return on average capital employed(21)6%
Efficiency
Cost per unit in real terms£25.13
Cost per unit in cash terms(22)£29.89
Service First Standards Speed
Percentage of office copy and official search applications handled within two working days and98%
Percentage of office copies and official searches processed in three working days100%
Percentage of all registrations processed within in 25 working days(23)80%
Accuracy
Percentage of registrations processed free of any error98.5%
Percentage of customers responding to the Annual Survey who perceive the accuracy of registrations to be excellent or goodBetter than 90%
Delivery of Electronic Services
Percentage of dealings (key customer interactions) capable of electronic delivery30%
Percentage of titles in the Land Register capable of electronic delivery95%
Percentage of titles plans in the Land Register capable of electronic delivery60%
Number of scanned pages of filed documents (millions).8.5

(21) ROCE below 6% reflects agreement with HM Treasury to apply surplus income generated in 1993-95 (when ROCE exceeded 25% in each year) to fee reductions in 1996-99. The ROCE for 1999-2000 is subject to confirmation by HM Treasury.

(22) The inflation factor for the cost per unit in cash terms is derived from the GDP indices announced by HM Treasury on 9 March 1999.

(23) Denotes the aim in the Registry's Statement of 'Service First' Standards which are detailed in Annex C of the Business Plan 1999-2000.

Note:

Fuller details of the agency's targets are given in its Business Plan, which is available from Her Majesty's Land Registry.


31 Mar 1999 : Column: 771

Public Record Office Key Performance Indicators and Targets 1999-2000

IndicatorTarget
1. Efficiency
Unit costs of key activities:
(a) selecting and preserving the public records£107.64 per metre: i.e. limit increase to 5%
(b) giving access to records£3.82 per information transaction: i.e. reduce by 50%
Backlog of records in departments reported as being over 30 years old and awaiting review.Process backlog by:
(a) reviewing 480 metres
(b) preparing for review an additional 1,000 metres
Provision of acceptable storage conditions i.e. meeting the preservation and environmental standards recommended by BS 5454: 1989 Recommendations for storage and exhibition of archival documents (BSI, 1989).Increase the proportion of records stored to the standards from 88.29% to 88.45%.
Management efficiency in running support services and projects.(a) reduce the level of staff sick absence in 1999 by 4.3%
(b) increase the proportion of invoices paid within thirty days from 97.5% to 99%
2. Quality of Service
The achievement of Charter Standards (a) Charter Standard targets for answering letters, delivering documents to users and reprographic servicesAchieve 98.5% against the targets.
(b) User satisfaction surveysAchieve assessment of 'excellent' on 56% of survey forms returned.
3. Effectiveness
Performance in achieving specified milestones towards strategic objectives in the light of emerging government policies.(a) increase revenue by 3% against the 1998-99 target
(b) make our lists of records available on the Internet by 31 October
(c) complete and disseminate three quality standards to guide public record bodies on the selection of records in line with the new Acquisition policy

Note:

Full details of the Office's targets are given in its Business Plan, which is available from the Public Record Office.


31 Mar 1999 : Column: 773

31 Mar 1999 : Column: 773

Public Trust Office Executive Agency Key Performance Targets 1999-2000

IndicatorTarget
1. To carry out accounting transactions within target times.To bring to account at least 99 per cent. of receipts and payments transactions within turnaround targets by volume wrighted performance.
2. To achieve investment targets.To pay interest on the special rate account at an annual rate at or above the average of the agreed comparator, and to pay at least 75% of that rate on basic rate accounts; to ensure that 92.5% of all funds which have a Dedicated Investment Portfolio(24)have a formal investment review(25) at least once a year.
3. To achieve Charter Standards.To achieve 98% of the 19 Charter Standards of most importance to the Office's users(26)
4. To meet the unit cost target.To operate within a unit cost of £198.41.
5. Percentage of full costs recovered.To ensure that 100% of full costs are recovered.

(24) A Dedicated Investment Portfolio is one which has been constructed to accommodate the specific requirements of the client and has a sufficiency of funds and duration to allow it to be adjusted in line with stockmarket or client circumstances.

(25) The formal investment review is a full consideration of the overall investment strategy being pursued for a particular portfolio. It is complemented by PTO policies of unitising smaller funds and benchmarking larger portfolios against stock exchange models. The investment media held in the funds are subject to on-going review as company announcements or relevant research material becomes available and actioned at any time.

(26) The target includes two new standards for the review of receivership accounts, they are to:

complete a review of 80% of receivers' accounts within 12 weeks of receipt;

review 80% of the Receiver's accounts within 12 weeks.

These standards will be reviewed on receipt of the Committee of Public Accounts' recommendations on the Comptroller and Auditor General's report 'Protecting the Financial Welfare of People with Mental Incapacity'.

Note:

Fuller details of the Office's performance targets will appear in the PTO Plan, which will be available from the Public Trust Office later in the year.


31 Mar 1999 : Column: 773

31 Mar 1999 : Column: 773

Court Service Key Performance Indicators and Targets 1999-2000

IndicatorTarget
Provide a courteous, reliable and accurate service, relevant information and suitable facilities
KPI 1 the quality of service provided to court users.83%
Complete all administrative processes promptly
KPI 2 the percentage of administrative work in the civil courts dealt. with within target time92%
Reduce waiting times for trial or hearing
KPI 3 the percentage of Crown Court cases that commence within target.78%
KPI 4 average waiting time for Asylum Appeals from receipt at Immigration Appellate Authorities to promulgation of the Adjudicator's decision.23 weeks
Reduce the cost of the services we provide
KPI 5 the unit cost of a case in the Crown Court.£2,118
KPI 6 the unit cost of an item of originating process in the civil courts.£118
Achieve full cost recovery in the civil courts
KPI 7 the percentage of the cost of the civil courts recovered through fees94%

31 Mar 1999 : Column: 774


Next Section Index Home Page