Previous Section Index Home Page


Quality Protects Plans

Angela Smith: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what is the outcome of the evaluation of the Quality

13 Apr 1999 : Column: 114

Protects management action plans submitted to his Department by local authorities; and if he will make a statement. [80518]

Mr. Hutton: All local authorities submitted their Quality Protects Management Action Plans (MAPs) to the Department by the end of January. The Social Services Inspectorate (SSI) have now completed their evaluation of the MAPs and we have considered their findings. I am pleased to announce that all the MAPs have reached an acceptable standard, and I have written today to local authority chief executives to confirm that they will receive payment of their allocation of the children's special grant for 1999-2000, subject to Parliamentary approval. We shall be publishing a national overview report, summarising the key findings from the evaluation of the MAPs and identifying the development needs which will be addressed over the three years of the Quality Protects programme. The team of Quality Protects Regional Development Workers in partnership with SSI will be assisting local authorities in their work to deliver the high quality children's social services which the Government require.

Pharmacy Remuneration

Mr. Todd: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will list the date of settlement of pharmacy remuneration negotiations for each year since 1994 and in each case the period covered; and when he plans to settle the next remuneration negotiations. [80101]

Mr. Denham: Pharmacy remuneration negotiations were settled on the following dates for the following financial years:

Financial yearDate
1994-954 May 1994
1995-9628 June 1995
1996-9721 October 1996
1997-987 October 1997
1998-9930 November 1998

We hope to settle this year's remuneration negotiations as soon as possible.

Military District Hospitals

Mr. Viggers: To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to the answer of 18 March 1999, Official Report, columns 803-04, which health authorities are to be compensated for the loss of free provision of MOD staff, indicating the amounts involved in each case. [80618]

Mr. Denham: The following health authorities are to be compensated for the loss of free provision of MOD staff for 1999/2000:

£
Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly348,000
South and West Devon1,235,000
North and Mid Hampshire309,000
West Surrey926,000
North West Anglia666,000

13 Apr 1999 : Column: 115

TREASURY

Excise Duty and VAT (Fuel)

Mr. Whittingdale: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list the rates of (a) excise duty and (b) VAT on petroleum in each member state of the European Union, the United States of America and Canada, taking account of the changes in his Budget. [76568]

Ms Hewitt: The United Kingdom rates shown are those applying since the Budget on 9 March 1999, published in Customs & Excise Budget Notice 6/99.

For other European Union member states the figures relate to January 1999, as shown in the Oil Bulletin published by the European Commission. The rates for the United States of America and Canada are for the fourth quarter of 1998 from Prices and Taxes Table 1, published by the International Energy Agency.

Leaded Petrol Unleaded Petrol
Excise Duty pence per litreVAT per cent.Excise Duty pence per litreVAT per cent.
AustriaNANA29.1920.0
Belgium39.8321.035.7321.0
DenmarkNANA35.6825.0
FinlandNANA39.4322.0
France44.8520.641.5220.6
Germany38.9016.035.3016.0
Greece25.9218.022.4418.0
Ireland32.2221.026.6821.0
Italy40.7320.038.1620.0
Luxembourg28.1315.024.4612.0
Netherlands41.3117.541.3317.5
Portugal37.2117.035.1217.0
Spain28.5116.026.1816.0
SwedenNANA34.3025.0
United Kingdom52.8817.547.2117.5
United States of AmericaNANA6.12--
CanadaNANA10.45--

Notes:

NA: Leaded petrol is not available

The United States of America does not have a tax comparable to VAT. The federal excise and provincial sales taxes in Canada vary for each of the ten provinces, therefore the rate of excise tax in the table is an average of all the rates used. The average sales tax in Canada is 1.4 pence per litre.

The exchange rates used to convert foreign tax rates into sterling for the European Union member states are those published by the European Commission for 11 January 1999. Those for the United States of America and Canada are for January 1999, taken from the Office for National Statistics publication, "Financial Statistics, February 1999 edition", table 7.1A.


Mr. Whittingdale: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list the rates of (a) excise duty and (b) VAT on (i) diesel and (ii) ultra-low sulphur diesel in each member state of the European Union, the United States of America and Canada, taking account of the changes in his Budget. [76572]

Ms Hewitt: The United Kingdom rates shown are those applying since the Budget on 9 March 1999, published in Customs and Excise Budget Notice 6/99.

For other European Union member states the figures relate to January 1999, as shown in the Oil Bulletin published by the European Commission. The rates for the

13 Apr 1999 : Column: 116

United States of America and Canada are for the fourth quarter of 1998 from Prices and Taxes Table 1, published by the International Energy Agency.

Diesel
Excise DutyVAT
Pence per litrePercentage
Austria20.4120.0
Belgium20.4321.0
Denmark21.6725.0
Finland21.4622.0
France26.8720.6
Germany22.3316.0
Greece18.0718.0
Ireland23.2521.0
Italy28.4020.0
Luxembourg17.8115.0
Netherlands24.3717.5
Portugal20.8017.0
Spain19.0116.0
Sweden20.5125.0
United Kingdom50.2117.5
United States of America7.03--
Canada7.10--

Notes:

1. The excise duty rate in the United Kingdom for low sulphur diesel is 47.21 pence per litre and the VAT rate is 17.5%. Rates of excise duty and VAT on low sulphur diesel are not available for the other countries of the European Union, United States of America and Canada.

2. The United States of America does not have a tax comparable to VAT. The average sales tax in Canada is 1.4 pence per litre.

3. The exchange rates used to convert foreign tax into sterling for the European Union member states are those published by the European Commission for 11 January 1999. Those for the United States of America and Canada are for January 1999, taken from the Office for National Statistics publication Financial Statistics, February 1999 edition, table 7.1A.


Civil Servants (Appraisal)

Mr. McDonnell: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what were the appraisal performance markings awarded to civil servants in 1998 for (a) each agency in his Department and (b) the Department broken down by (i) grade, (ii) gender, (iii) ethnicity, (iv) part-time/ full-time working and (v) disability; and for (1) each agency and (2) the Department whether the Cabinet Office's four fifths rule for detecting potential adverse impact was applied to the appraisal markings of civil servants in the 1998 report round. [78143]

Ms Hewitt: HM Treasury's appraisal year runs from 1 February to 31 January. The performance markings awarded in 1998 therefore apply to the 1997-98 appraisal year.


Below Senior Civil service (SCS)

Box ABox BBox CBox D Box E
A31031120
B65176510
C42468223
D849107241
E124475290


13 Apr 1999 : Column: 117

SCS (To preserve anonymity, these markings cannot be provided by grade)

Box 1Box 2+Box 2Box 3+Box 3Box 4Box 5
6163016000




    (iii) Ethnicity

    Below SCS

    Box ABox BBox CBox DBox E
    Ethnic minority02038320
    White29143286924
    Unknown41533140


    SCS


    The number of ethnic minority staff in the Senior Civil Service is too small to allow an anonymous breakdown of markings.


    (iv) Part-time/full-time working

Below SCS

Box ABox BBox CBox DBox E
Part-time161980
Full-time321723381304



    The number of part-time staff in the Senior Civil Service is too small to allow an anonymous breakdown of markings.


    (v) Disability

Below SCS

Box ABox BBox CBox DBox E
Disabled141340
Not disabled321743441344



    The number of disabled staff in the Senior Civil Service is too small to allow an anonymous breakdown of markings.

The Cabinet Office's four fifths rule was not applied to the 1997-98 appraisal markings. However, the Department's appraisal system will be reviewed in a wider equality audit in the Spring.


Next Section Index Home Page