Previous Section Index Home Page


Female Prisoners (Prescription-only Drugs)

Mr. Stinchcombe: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many doses of prescription- only (a) psychotropic, (b) hypnotic, (c) other drugs acting on the central nervous system and (d) other drugs were prescribed in each prison holding female prisoners in the most recent year for which figures are available. [84946]

Mr. George Howarth: The information requested is not collected centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

Pharmaceuticals are generally purchased locally and managed using a number of systems. Also, prescription records are kept within individual prisoner medical files,

25 May 1999 : Column: 76

making it difficult to aggregate information about total usage of individual drugs, or families of drugs, in a meaningful way.

The Prison Service, in deciding on the range of management information about health care activity that is collected from prisons, tries to strike a balance between the costs involved, including the administrative burden on prison staff, and the possible benefits. However, increasing use of Information Technology offers the opportunity to broaden the range of statistics that can be readily available and this matter is kept under review.

Prisoners (Voting Rights)

Mr. Stinchcombe: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many unconvicted prisoners in England and Wales exercised their right to vote in the recent local government elections and elections for the Welsh Assembly and Scottish Parliament. [84947]

Mr. George Howarth: The figures for the number of unconvicted prisoners who exercised their right to vote in the recent local government elections and elections for the Welsh Assembly and Scottish Parliament are not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Home Detention Curfew

Mr. Stinchcombe: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list by prison the number of prisoners (a) assessed for release on home detention curfew, (b) released and (c) recalled. [84942]

Mr. George Howarth: The table gives the information requested up to the end of April according to the Prison Service's inmate information system. The number of prisoners assessed for home detention curfew at each establishment is estimated from the population extracts for the end of each month for prisoners who had a calculated home detention curfew eligibility date within the relevant period. The number actually assessed may be more or less due to the transfer or reception of prisoners during the month.

Home detention curfew--numbers eligible, placed on curfew and recalled--28 January to 30 April 1999

Eligible (estimated)CurfewedRevoked
Acklington96303
Albany200
Aldington73282
Altcourse139210
Ashwell80121
Askham Grange41400
Aylesbury631
Bedford118191
Belmarsh121203
Birmingham2891649
Blakenhurst236621
Blantyre House000
Blundeston1860
Brinsford88130
Bristol100162
Brixton141473
Brockhill3990
Buckley Hall3150
Bullingdon210584
Bullwood Hall1970
Camp Hill113120
Canterbury65170
Cardiff217554
Castington4750
Channings Wood106211
Chelmsford78151
Colchester000
Coldingley800
Cookham Wood2651
Dartmoor66121
Deerbolt134150
Doncaster216493
Dorchester5940
Dover82193
Downview20121
Drake Hall160723
Durham225422
Earlstoke40140
East Sutton Park37300
Eastwood Park99320
Elmley156324
Everthorpe103504
Exeter157535
Featherstone68263
Feltham103241
Ford1441192
Foston Hall3591
Frankland000
Full Sutton000
Garth000
Gartree000
Glen Parva173372
Gloucester53130
Grendon72691
Guys Marsh196614
Haslar220
Hatfield87602
Haverigg112180
Hewell Grange1001021
Highdown167692
Highpoint154432
Hindley116130
Hollesley Bay82485
Holloway75281
Holme House323693
Hull181310
Huntercombe95614
Kingston000
Kirkham3302038
Kirklevington44380
Lancaster15260
Lancaster Farms79190
Latchmere House000
Leeds238515
Leicester3610
Lewes133384
Leyhill44340
Lincoln110201
Lindholme144633
Littlehey76120
Liverpool498603
Long Lartin000
Low Newton37191
Lowdham Grange000
Maidstone730
Manchester99150
Moorland86432
Morton Hall135973
New Hall103300
North Sea Camp108800
Northallerton87303
Norwich2641286
Nottingham4421
Onley161653
Parc15570
Parkhurst1010
Pentonville278655
Portland114240
Preston155193
Pucklechurch000
Ranby217330
Reading62120
Risley257330
Rochester1790
Send1160
Shepton Mallet34120
Shrewsbury86466
Stafford116272
Stanford Hill93972
Stocken75261
Stoke Heath193170
Styal64383
Sudbury82692
Swaleside430
Swansea92182
Swinfen Hall620
The Mount93342
The Verne4380
The Wolds3871
Thorn Cross88619
Usk71540
Wakefield000
Wandsworth244581
Wayland78332
Wealstun81631
Weare173542
Wellingborough49251
Werrington000
Wetherby41202
Whatton2000
Whitemoor000
Winchester133555
Woodhill182531
Wormwood Scrubs203703
Wymott80110

25 May 1999 : Column: 78

Bookmakers

Mr. Cunliffe: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what decision he has taken on the composition of the Bookmakers Committee. [85651]

Mr. George Howarth: On 3 December 1998, we sought the views of interested bodies on proposals for reconstituting the Bookmakers' Committee. Having taken careful account of the views expressed we have decided to make those changes. We believe that this will improve the Committee's ability to represent bookmakers' interests in a balanced way in carrying out its task of recommending to the Horserace Betting Levy Board the levy rates to be paid by bookmakers for the benefit of horseracing.

25 May 1999 : Column: 79

Therefore, I have today made regulations to establish the following membership:

Seats
Betting Office Licensees Association Ltd2
National Association of Bookmakers Ltd2
British Betting Office Association Ltd2
Ladbroke Racing Ltd2
Willian Hill Organisation Ltd2
Coral Racing Ltd2
Total12

In providing for the three companies which in 1998-99 contributed nearly 80 per cent. of the total levy yield to have half of the seats on the Committee, we are redressing their previous under-representation while at the same time recognising the extent to which there are many smaller firms whose ability to pay needs to be properly represented. In reaching this decision, we have sought to achieve a reasonable balance between the different bookmaking interests and organisations. The factors taken into account were the size of organisations' membership, the number of off-course shops, the leviable turnover and the levy paid. We do not believe that the new structure will give any companies double representation on the Committee. Nor do we believe that continuing representation of the Scottish Independent Bookmakers Association is justified, given the small number of members, some of whom also belong to other trade associations. We believe that the new constitution will still take proper account of the interests of small independent bookmakers, whether in Scotland or South of the Border.

It will be for the Committee itself to decide who will chair it and how it will manage its business. We very much hope that the Committee will make every effort to reach agreement on the next levy scheme with the Levy Board. Co-operation between bookmaking and racing interests is important in this as in other areas.

We will keep the new arrangements under review, with the help of the independent members of the Levy Board, whose brief it is to have regard to the interests of racing, bookmakers in all categories and the punter.


Next Section Index Home Page