Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Mr. Hood:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the future of the Duke of York's Headquarters, Chelsea. [87836]
18 Jun 1999 : Column: 257
Mr. Spellar:
On 8 July 1998, in connection with the publication of the Strategic Defence Review (SDR) we announced that the Duke of York's HQ in Chelsea would be sold and that its occupants, primarily the Territorial, Auxiliary & Volunteer Reserve Association for Greater London and Territorial Army units, would be re-accommodated as necessary. Since then, my Department has been considering how it might secure the optimum receipt for this prestigious site.
Following negotiations, and supported by advice from independent consultants, we have decided to proceed with a private treaty sale of the freehold of the site to Cadogan Estates, who own the principal adjoining site and are a special purchaser. The sale contract will be subject to Cadogan Estates achieving planning consent for an agreed planning application.
The agreed terms specify vacation of a considerable part of the site by March 2000. We require a longer period to finalise and prepare alternative locations for the affected units and we will vacate a further part of the site over the three years to 2003. Under the deal we have negotiated with Cadogan Estates, MOD retains an option for TA and cadet occupation in a small enclave within the site beyond 2003. However, we have not come to a decision yet on whether or not to exercise this option.
Mr. Keith Simpson:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what is the current proportion of (a) the Army and (b) Land Command (i) committed and (ii) warned to deploy for operations. [85913]
Mr. Doug Henderson
[holding answer 8 June 1999]: As at 11 June, some 47 per cent. of the Army and some 72 per cent. of Land Command personnel were committed to operations. These figures include those preparing for and recovering from operations.
Figures for those "warned to deploy" do not meaningfully reflect the current level of operational commitment because the notice given to units depends on the circumstances of the individual unit and the commitment involved. They are a reflection of the current state of the administrative planning process used to identify suitable units to replace those currently on operations and some would be included in the figures for those committed to operations. However, if calculated on the same basis as my Answer of 22 April 1999, Official Report, column 633, the figures for those warned to deploy on operations would be some 24 per cent. of the Army and some 37 per cent. of Land Command.
18 Jun 1999 : Column: 258
Mr. Bercow:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on his policy on (i) retention and (ii) deployment of women in the armed forces. [86368]
Mr. Doug Henderson:
All three Services are wholly committed to maximising employment opportunities for women in the armed forces, except where it is assessed that this could undermine combat effectiveness. 73 per cent. of posts in the Naval Service, 70 per cent. of posts in the Army and 96 per cent. of posts in the Royal Air Force are open to women.
The Secretary of State commissioned a review into those posts closed to women on the ground of combat effectiveness; that is, the Royal Marines General Service, the Infantry, the Royal Armoured Corps and the RAF Regiment. Following the review it was decided that 1,300 specialist posts in the Royal Marines filled by Royal Navy and Army personnel would be opened to women. The results of the review were set out in the report of the Strategic Defence Review (Comd 2999) published in July last year.
Studies are also being undertaken to assess the impact on combat effectiveness of increasing, to 70 per cent. the number of posts open to women in the Army and of allowing women to serve in "attached billets" in the Royal Marines. This work is due to complete in 2001.
As I said on 24 February 1999, Official Report, columns 300-01, we have decided that, following a review into the employment of women in submarines and in mine clearance diving branches, posts in these areas should remain closed on medical grounds.
Servicewomen currently represent around 7.7 per cent. of the total strength of the armed forces. In the 12 months to 1 April 1999, 12 per cent. of all new recruits were women; exit rates for women have remained relatively stable at 10 per cent.
Mr. Hancock:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many Royal Navy ships currently at sea or operational have a shortfall in crew size broken down by (i) ship and (ii) discipline; and if he will make a statement. [86380]
Mr. Doug Henderson:
The shortfalls for the Royal Navy Surface Flotilla ships currently at sea or operational as at 11 June 1999 are:
18 Jun 1999 : Column: 257
There are no submarines operating below their full crew complement.
18 Jun 1999 : Column: 259
18 Jun 1999 : Column: 259
Mr. Hancock:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence which Royal Navy ships have been deployed for more than six months in the last two years and in each case for how long they were deployed; and if he will make a statement. [86383]
Mr. Doug Henderson:
Royal Navy ships deployed for more than six months in the period 31 May 1997 to 31 May 1999 are as follows:
Ship | Days deployed |
---|---|
HMS Brave | 220 |
HMS Coventry | 217 |
HMS Liverpool | 195 |
HMS Newcastle | 196 |
HMS Nottingham | 214 |
HMS Westminster | 198 |
HMS London | 194 |
HMS Northumberland | 199 |
HMS Leeds Castle | 284 |
HMS Alderney | 188 |
HMS Guernsey | 199 |
HMS Shetland | 188 |
HMS Cumberland | 234 |
HMS Grafton | 204 |
HMS Sheffield | 203 |
HMS Sutherland | 204 |
HMS Dumbarton Castle | 365 |
HMS Scott | 219 |
HMS Orkney | 188 |
18 Jun 1999 : Column: 260
These figures represent the total number of days that the various ships were deployed, but in a number of cases the crews were changed during the course of the deployment.
Mr. Bob Russell: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list, by regiment and other section headings (a) the official complement and (b) the actual numbers in post in the Army. [87005]
Mr. Doug Henderson: Different Service Arms attach the term "Regiment" to varying sizes of formation, and not all of them further divide their "official complement" (referred to internally as the Liability, or the "Manpower Planning Target"). The following information is provided in terms of Arm/Service.
The following table provides details of each Service Arm's Strength and Liability, and the difference between the two, as at 1 April 1999. In line with our normal practice, the figures provided include the UK Trained Adult Personnel and Gurkhas, but exclude the Royal Irish (Home Service) Regiment and officers and soldiers under training. The figures shown for the Gurkhas include some three hundred men who form the Gurkha reinforcement companies which are attached to three infantry regiments, and a number of Gurkhas held over Liability to fill key posts elsewhere. I should also point out that the figures do not include 98 officers and 485 soldiers from the Reserves who are mobilised in Bosnia, or 226 Full Time Reservist Service personnel.
18 Jun 1999 : Column: 261
Arm/Service | Liability(5) | Strength | +/- |
---|---|---|---|
Staff Officers | 689 | 725 | +36 |
Household Cavalry/Royal Armoured Corps | 5,949 | 5,492 | -457 |
Royal Artillery | 8,621 | 7,869 | -752 |
Royal Engineers | 8,336 | 8,653 | +317 |
Royal Signals | 9,045 | 8,174 | -871 |
Infantry | 27,321 | 24,972 | -2,349 |
Army Air Corps | 1,706 | 1,540 | -166 |
Royal Army Chaplain's Department | 137 | 135 | -2 |
Royal Logistic Corps | 15,860 | 15,224 | -636 |
Royal Army Medical Corps | 2,720 | 2,720 | -328 |
Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers | 10,069 | 9,560 | -509 |
Adjutant General's Corps | 6,954 | 7,034 | +80 |
Royal Army Veterinary Corps | 165 | 132 | -33 |
Small Arms School Corps | 140 | 149 | +9 |
Royal Army Dental Corps | 428 | 350 | -78 |
Intelligence Corps | 1,216 | 1,095 | -121 |
Army Physical Training Corps | 393 | 386 | -7 |
Queen Alexandra's Royal Army Nursing Corps | 882 | 667 | -215 |
Corps of Army Musicians | 1,161 | 1,051 | -110 |
General List | 0 | 2 | +2 |
Unallocated | 0 | 125 | +125 |
Long Service List | 597 | 573 | -24 |
Gurkhas | 2,882 | 3,374 | +492 |
Total | 105,271 | 99,674 | -5,597 |
(5) To implement the Post-SDR force structure the Army's Manpower Requirement (Liability) for Regular Forces (including Gurkhas, but excluding R IRISH (HS) Full Time, Territorial Army and Full Time Reserve Personnel) will increase to 108,439 by 1 April 2005.
Mr. Bob Russell: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what was the shortfall in the official complement of the Army on 1 May (a) 1997 and (b) 1998. [87035]
Mr. Doug Henderson: The shortfall of UK Trained Army Personnel as at 1 May 1997 and 1 May 1998 was 5,406 and 5,438 respectively, and for Gurkha Trained Personnel, a surplus of 473 existed on both dates. These figures exclude Royal Irish (Home Service), and reserve personnel mobilised for duties associated with Bosnia, Full Time Reserve Personnel and Locally Employed Personnel.
Next Section | Index | Home Page |