Select Committee on Defence Third Report



Process of drafting the new Strategic Concept

24. The Council in Permanent Session—made up of Allied countries' permanent representatives in Brussels—was tasked at NATO's Madrid Summit with examining and updating as necessary the 1991 Strategic Concept, with the assumption that the resulting work would—

... confirm our commitment to the core function of Alliance collective defence and the indispensable transatlantic link.[37]

In the autumn of 1997, terms of reference were developed, which were approved in the ministerial meetings of the North Atlantic Council that December. The process itself involved the identification of passages in the 1991 Strategic Concept that were in need of 'updating' because they had been rendered obsolescent by changes in the strategic environment or subsequent events. There followed a long series of 'brainstorming' sessions, as a result of which a draft of a revised Strategic Concept was presented by the International Staff in the late summer of last year.[38] The final document is intended to provide a clear guide as to the Alliance's purpose for the next ten to fifteen years, as well as to guide NATO's central military planners in the drafting of their major planning document.

25. While originally most members had pleaded for minimal revisions, stressing the remit of 'updating as necessary', enthusiasm for a much more thorough revision grew markedly in some quarters, particularly as several fundamental issues were raised. These include:[39]

  • the balance between 'old [Cold War] missions' and 'new [post-Cold War] missions', or, in the words of Sir Michael Alexander, the balance between collective defence and collective security missions;

  • the mandate under which NATO might take action, other than in a clear Article 5 situation;

  • the definition of the area in which NATO might in future operate;

  • relations with non-members of NATO;

  • the structural adaptation of NATO to new missions and enlargement; and

  • the strengthening of a European Security and Defence Identity (ESDI) within NATO.

We discuss these issues more fully below.


37  Madrid Declaration, para 19 Back

38  Private briefing, NATO HQ Back

39  Ev p 119 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1999
Prepared 13 April 1999