Annex D
ERRATA TO THE 1997 ANNUAL REPORT ON STRATEGIC
EXPORT CONTROLS
Information on Standard Individual Export Licences
In addition to the errata identified previously,
details of one application refused were unintentionally omitted
from the Report. Consequently, the number of applications for
standard individual export licences refused during the reporting
period, given on page 20 of the Report, should read "57";
there was also an error in the description of the military equipment
covered by two licences.
CHANNEL ISLANDS
The description "vintage machine guns"
should read "vintage machine gun part".
INDIA
Total No. of SIELs refused should read "11",
the rating of the goods covered by the application omitted from
the Report was "End use".
SRI LANKA
The military equipment covered by one of the
licences rated ML7 was omitted from the Report and "NBC respirators"
should be added.
ERRATA TO THE 1998 ANNUAL REPORT ON STRATEGIC
EXPORT CONTROLS
Information on Standard Individual Export Licences
Five applications refused during before 1 January
1998 were wrongly included in the 1998 Report. Consequently, the
number of applications for standard individual export licences
refused during the reporting period, given on page 8 should read
"117" and not 122.
Two licences were wrongly described in the Report
as having been revoked. Consequently, the number of applications
for standard individual export licences revoked during the period,
given on page 8 should read "5" and not 6, and the number
of standard individual transhipment licences revoked during the
period should read "0" and not "1".
The information on two applications refused
during the period was shown incorrectly:
— one application was recorded against
the wrong country;
— one application was described as
covering goods controlled under the wrong rating.
The information on four licences issued during
the period was shown incorrectly:
— two licences were recorded against
the wrong country;
— the wrong description was given of
the military equipment covered by two licences.
ALGERIA
The description "military image intensifier
equipment" should read "night vision goggles".
BOSNIA AND
HERZEGOVINA
Total No. of SIELs refused should read "3",
the application that was omittted covered goods controlled under
rating "ML1".
CHINA
Total No. of SIELs refused should read "3";
the application that was wrongly included covered goods controlled
under rating"ML13".
Total No. of SIELs issued should read "31";
the application that was wrongly included covered goods controlled
under rating "ML10".
The description "military imaging equipment"
should read "infra red/thermal imaging equipment".
CROATIA
Total No. of SIELs refused should read "2";
the application that was wrongly included covered goods controlled
under rating "ML1".
CYPRUS
Total No. of SIELs refused should read "4";
the application that was wrongly included covered goods controlled
under rating "ML5".
HONG KONG
SAR
Total No. of SIELs revoked should read "0";
the licence was returned unused.
INDIA
Total No. of SIELs refused should read "29";
the applications that were wrongly included covered goods controlled
under rating "End use".
ISRAEL
Total No. of SIELs refused should read "1";
the application that was wrongly included covered goods controlled
under rating "ML10".
KOREA, DEMOCRATIC
PEOPLE'S
REPUBLIC OF
There should not be any entry for this destination.
KOREA, REPUBLIC
OF
Total No. of SIELs refused should read "179";
145 covering goods on the Military List and 34 covering other
goods. The licence that was omitted covered demolition charges
and the rating of these goods was "ML4".
SUDAN
Total No. of SIELs refused covering goods controlled
under the rating ML1 should read "0"; and Total No.
of SIELs refused covering goods controlled under the rating ML2
should read "1".
TAIWAN
Total No. of SIELs issued should read "63";
the application that was omitted covered goods controlled under
the rating "ML10".
UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA
Total No. of SIELs revoked should read "0";
the licence was returned unused, and not revoked.
31 January 2000
Information on Open Individual Export
Licences
As a result of a clerical error at the stage
of compiling the data for publication in the Report, there were
errors in two Tables in the Report. The name of one destination—"Portugal"
was omitted from Table 2B on page 104 of the Report. In addition
some of the countries excluded from the destination of one of
the OIELs amended during the period to exclude particular destinations,
and the rating of the goods covered by that licence were omitted
from Table 5 on page 121 of the Report. A corrected version of
this Table is given below.
|
| Destination | ML4 | ML6
| ML9 | ML10 | ML13
| 5A002 | 5D002 | No. of OIELs covering goods on the Military List from which this destination was excluded
| No. of OIELs covering Dual Use Goods from which this destination was excluded
|
|
| Afghanistan | |
| | | |
| 1 | | 1 |
| Albania | |
| | | | 1
| | | 1 |
| Burma | | |
| | |
| 1 | | 1 |
| Bosnia and | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Herzegovina | |
| | | | 1
| | | 1 |
| Croatia | |
| | | | 1
| | | 1 |
| Cyprus | | |
| | | 1
| | | 1 |
| Hong Kong SAR | |
| | | 1 |
| 1 | |
|
| India | 1 | 1
| 1 | 1 | |
| | 1 |
|
| Indonesia | |
| | | | 1
| | | 1 |
| Macedonia | |
| | | | 1
| | | 1 |
| Nigeria | |
| | | | 1
| | | 1 |
| Yugoslavia, Federal Republic of |
| | | |
| 1 | | |
1 |
|
| 
