Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Third Special Report


APPENDIX

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE NINTH REPORT OF THE ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE ON THE INTEGRATED TRANSPORT WHITE PAPER.

Forward by the Deputy Prime Minister

I would like to express my personal thanks to the members of the Committee for their extensive work on DETR's policies and proposals, and in particular our Integrated Transport White Paper.

As we approach the beginning of the 21st century, we are entering a new era in transport policy.

There is a growing consensus that we cannot go on as we have been. Traffic congestion is already a major problem for our economy, for our environment, for our health and for motorists themselves. Twenty years ago there were 70 cars per mile of road. Despite road building, by 1997 there were 100 cars per mile of road.

Building our way out of congestion is not an option. And failing to tackle congestion is the worst policy for the motorist and the country. We have to use public transport more and use our cars more wisely.

That is why in the first comprehensive Transport White Paper in twenty years, we proposed:

  •   to improve public transport to increase travel choice;

  •   to improve the existing road infrastructure by better maintenance and traffic management;

  •   to take an integrated approach to transport and the range of Government policies

    I am pleased that the Committee broadly welcomes our proposals including tougher regulation of the railways, higher quality bus services, the integration of transport and planning policies and road-user pricing with the proceeds used to improve local transport.

    We are in substantial agreement with the overwhelming majority of the Committee's recommendations. Even though we are not moving as far or as fast as the Committee would wish, the Committee acknowledged that we are moving in the right direction.

    I trust the Committee's Ninth Report and this response will be milestones on the way to a better transport system for Britain.

    Introduction

    The Government's transport White Paper "A New Deal for Transport: Better for Everyone" was published in July 1998; the Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs Committee's inquiry began later the same year. The outcome of that inquiry was the Committee's Ninth Report, which expressed support for the aims of the White Paper and set out recommendations on a number of areas of the integrated transport strategy.

    This document constitutes the Government's formal response to that Report on the Integrated Transport White Paper. The Committee's recommendations are shown in bold throughout, with the relevant paragraph number in the committee's report in brackets. They are grouped into general topic areas.

    The Committee undertook its inquiry prior to the inauguration of the Welsh Assembly and the Scottish Parliament. The Welsh and Scottish administrations have now assumed the newly devolved powers and Northern Ireland is moving towards devolution. Following these constitutional changes, some policies will continue to be developed on a UK basis, others on an England and Wales basis and others for England only. Where matters come under the authority of the new devolved bodies, this response does not reflect their implementation of policy.

    Commission for Integrated Transport

    (bbb)  We recommend that a single body, probably the Commission for Integrated Transport, be given responsibility for monitoring the progress of all the relevant agencies in achieving the White Paper's objectives on integration. Performance indicators should be introduced in order to monitor progress with integration, for example, by measuring the proportion of advertised rail and bus-rail connections that are not kept. The Commission should publish an Annual Report which would indicate the progress made (paragraph 231).

    The Department will lead in the implementation of the Government's integrated transport strategy, set out in A New Deal for Transport: Better for Everyone. A key part of the role of the Commission for Integrated Transport will be reviewing and monitoring progress towards the objectives of the strategy. It will advise Government on drawing up new targets to support the policy, particularly in relation to national road traffic and public transport, and it will publish an Annual Report on progress. It will be for the Commission to consider where there is a role for targets on the reliability of rail and bus-rail connections.

    (ccc)  If the Commission for Integrated Transport is to assume a wider role, it must be given the resources to examine all the issues that are referred to it. Potential members should be informed that more than 1-2 days work per month will be expected (paragraph 232).

    The Commission will determine the programme it is able to progress in the light of the resources available. It will also be for the Commission to decide whether it wishes to bring in others to assist, for example in working groups on specific issues. It is important that Commission members are able to pursue their own outside roles to ensure that the expertise they bring remains up to date, and so 1 - 2 days per month is an appropriate guideline. Nonetheless, we recognise that individual members may be able to devote more time than this to help the Chair and Vice-Chair progress the agenda.

    (f)  Several important issues relating to policy on the future of roads and road traffic need to be resolved, including the setting of national targets; the role of new road construction; and the appraisal of new trunk roads. We recommend that the Commission for Integrated Transport make it a priority to examine these issues (paragraph 74).          

    The Commission is in the process of formulating its work programme. Its remit as set out in the Integrated Transport White Paper includes advice on national road traffic targets and revisions to National Road Traffic forecasts. Policy on the role of new construction is set out in the A New Deal for Trunk Roads in England: Understanding the New Approach to Appraisal. It will be for the Commission to consider whether it wishes to consider the findings of the multi-modal corridor studies, which are intended to inform the preparation of regional transport strategies and for which we are developing a multi-modal version of the new approach to appraisal.

    (aa)  The Government must ensure progress in making transport more accessible to disabled people is monitored closely. It should make the Commission for Integrated Transport responsible for encouraging and disseminating best practice (paragraph 151).

    It is clearly important that the Commission takes a strategic view across all issues and takes account of the needs of disabled people. The Department's statutory advisors, the Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee (DPTAC) are best placed to monitor and evaluate progress at a detailed level. The Chair of DPTAC is an ex-officio member of the Commission.

    Local authorities

    (ddd)  We recommend that a skills audit be undertaken to highlight any training needs for existing staff and any requirement for the recruitment of additional staff. Professional bodies and Government must work together to provide a suitable training programme which addresses any shortfalls identified by the audit (paragraph 233).

    Local transport plans (LTPs) represent a whole new way of working. Some local authorities will find the adjustment harder than others, but we are confident that local authorities can meet the challenge. We believe that the process of preparing LTPs is already acting as a positive force for change. It is primarily for local authorities to determine their precise training requirements and how best to meet them. Government has an important part to play in facilitating the dissemination of best practice in local transport planning and we are considering how to do that more effectively. This is likely to involve working jointly with local authorities and the relevant professional institutions.

    (iii)  We recommend that local authorities take a leading role in promoting and co-ordinating Green Transport Plans with local businesses, other major employers such as hospitals, and transport operators (paragraph 236).

    We agree. In the guidance on provisional local transport plans, (paragraphs 104 - 107) we asked local authorities to set out in their LTPs how they will secure widespread voluntary take-up of green transport plans by major employers in their areas through partnership with business and the wider community. We have asked them to consider the scope for green transport plans at sites where a large number of people commute daily (particularly businesses, hospitals and schools). Sites attracting substantial numbers of leisure or tourist trips will also be important for most local authorities. We have recommended that authorities should consider setting targets in their LTPs for the take-up of green transport plans in their area. We have also stressed that authorities can have a particularly important role in encouraging groups of employers in a local area to work together, and in facilitating partnerships between transport operators and employers. We believe that authorities also need to demonstrate that they are leading by example by developing green transport plans for their own major sites.

    The National TravelWise Association, which now has 100 members, mostly local authorities, is seeking to encourage people to be less reliant on the car through a range of measures, including promotion of green transport plans.

    (jjj)  We recommend that each local authority has a designated Green Transport Plan officer to offer advice and to foster co-operation between companies in order to share the cost of new facilities and providing information (paragraph 237).

    We agree. Current guidance on green transport plans, including the Transport 2000 guide Changing Journeys to Work and the DETR Guide to Green Transport Plans: Advice for Government Departments (both published in 1997), recommends that a key first step for organisations wanting to introduce green transport plans is to appoint a full-time or part-time green transport co-ordinator.

    Regional transport policies

    (sss)  We welcome the new Regional Transport Strategies as part of Regional Planning Guidance and the proposal to revise planning guidance notes on development plans, transport and housing. However, we are very concerned at the potential duplication, differing timescales and lack of clarity about the relationship between the various guidance notes, development and transport plans and Regional Transport Strategies and Regional Economic Strategies of Regional Development Agencies (paragraph 268).

    The Regional Development Agencies' (RDAs) regional strategies are concerned with promoting sustainable economic development and social and physical regeneration. To the extent that these strategies concern physical development they should operate within the long-term spatial strategies provided by Regional Planning Guidance (RPG) as issued by the Secretary of State. The Regional Transport Strategy (RTS) is part and parcel of RPG and not the RDA's strategy. Therefore they should not duplicate, but rather complement one another.

    The stage at which RPG review and RTS development has reached, varies by region and these reviews by their nature take longer than the timetable to which the RDAs are working. However, providing there is sufficient liaison, in which the Regional Chambers will have a key role, and given that each is subject to monitoring and further review to ensure that they are complementary, this potential problem can be overcome. The regional planning body will need to take account of the transport implications of the RDA's proposals and similarly the RTS should inform and assist the RDA in the development and implementation of its strategy.

    (ttt)  We expect local authorities to co-ordinate their proposals for new charges in accordance with regional transport strategies. The Government must ensure that regional transport strategies and Regional Planning Guidance prevent authorities' transport, planning and economic development strategies from undermining the road traffic reduction policies of neighbouring councils (paragraph 269).

    We agree with the Committee that there are advantages in authorities co-ordinating their actions at a regional level, although powers to introduce charging or levy schemes will rest with individual local traffic authorities working through their local transport plans. This is recognised in the recent consultation draft PPG11, Regional Planning. The RTS, as a key part of regional planning guidance (RPG), should help ensure that measures to influence transport use are not used in ways which, for example, encourage wasteful competition between neighbouring towns or cities in a region. Similarly, RPG will provide a regional framework for the preparation of development plans and local transport plans. It should therefore help to prevent local authorities from pursuing conflicting objectives which could undermine, among other things, the traffic reduction polices of neighbouring authorities to the cost of effective planning across the region.

    (uuu)  The Regional Economic Strategies of Regional Development Agencies must be drawn up in accordance with the principles of the Government's integrated transport policy. Regional Development Agencies and Regional Chambers have an important role to play in advocating the need for investment in integrated transport projects to promote regional economic competitiveness (paragraph 270).

    Statutory guidance on the formulation of RDA strategies was issued to the RDAs in March 1999. This states that each RDA strategy should "aim to support and enhance national policies while addressing the particular needs of the region. In formulating its strategy, the agency should have regard to all relevant statements of Government policy." The Government Offices in the Regions will be able to advise the RDAs on any national policy which has an impact on their strategies.

    RPG will provide a comprehensive spatial strategy for each region and will include the RTS. RDAs will need, like any other body, to work within and alongside the RPG framework. In developing their strategies, RDAs must have regard to the long-term spatial planning context for the region as issued by the Secretary of State.

    Regional chambers have an important role to play in building up the regional voice on behalf of the regional stakeholders. They have a specific role in relation to the RDA and will be consulted on the RDAs' regional strategies. The Government also sees a potential role for chambers in the preparation of RPG, including the RTS. However, that is for the regions themselves to decide. In some regions there have already been moves to establish sub-committees of the Chambers to undertake these tasks.

    Government

    (vvv)  We are convinced of the need for much closer co-operation between Government Departments to ensure that the new policies for transport are not undermined by policies implemented in other sectors. We are very concerned that failure to introduce specific mechanisms which ensure that transport considerations are central to policy-making will reduce the effectiveness of the White Paper's proposals (paragraph 279).

    We will be incorporating consideration of transport impacts of policy in the next revision of guidance on environmental assessment, which is used by all Government Departments.

    (xxx)  We recommend that a bill be introduced in this Session of Parliament to establish the Strategic Rail Authority. The next Queen's Speech should contain legislation to implement the proposals contained in Breaking the Logjam and From Workhorse to Thoroughbred (paragraph 285).

    We have introduced a Bill to establish the Strategic Rail Authority and are committed to legislation to implement the other proposals.


  •  
    previous page contents next page

    House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

    © Parliamentary copyright 1999
    Prepared 13 July 1999