Select Committee on Foreign Affairs Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 9

Letter from Chief Secretary, Government of Gibraltar, to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office,

27 November 1998

GIBRALTAR: SCHENGEN INCORPORATION

  Thank you for your letter dated 16 October 1998. This reply deals only with those parts of your letter which relate to Schengen Incorporation. We have since touched on these issues at our meeting in London on 24 November.

  I note that Member States are focusing on how to negotiate association agreements with Norway and Iceland, and on how to allocate an EU legal base to all Schengen provisions.

  This raises two issues for us. First, whether it might be possible for UK to negotiate an agreement for Schengen incorporation in respect of Gibraltar, even if the UK itself opts for non-incorporation. The second is that the choice of legal base for Schengen provisions is in itself important to Gibraltar since any base requiring unanimity will effectively give Spain a veto and thus leverage over the UK to exclude Gibraltar. UK should therefore insist on bases that avoid this.

  It is important that we are kept informed of developments in those negotiations. What is the position of UK, Spain and other member states in those negotiations? When is the Amsterdam Treaty now scheduled to come into force?

  The position of the Gibraltar Government is that it wishes to participate in all parts of Schengen in which the UK participates. Exclusion of Gibraltar from any parts which UK joins will isolate Gibraltar in the EU and thus advance Spain's objectives in that respect. Furthermore, if Gibraltar is excluded from parts that do not affect frontier controls, it will tend to justify Gibraltar's exclusion later from the frontiers parts if and when UK seeks to join those parts. Gibraltar could not regard that danger as hypothetical.

  Gibraltar therefore wishes to participate in Schengen fully. Only the UK's own non-participation should determine the extent of Gibraltar's participation. The same applies whether they be Third Pillar or First Pillar measures, and whether they be Schengen or Union Acquis measures.

  This is not an issue on which Gibraltar will be willing to remain silent. The territorial extension of these measures to Gibraltar, when they are extended to the UK, is an imperative for the Government of Gibraltar. It is not just a case of the UK position remaining the same as on the draft External Frontiers Convention, but rather that Schengen measures should actually apply and operate at the Gibraltar/Spain border as a matter of clear and established Treaty rights and obligations.

  Thank you for seeking our views specifically on various issues. The list of issues contained in the Home Office Aide Memoire handed to the Chief Minister at the Blackpool meeting gives no details or brief as to the substance of the measure in each issue. I would therefore be grateful if briefing papers could be urgently made available to us so that we can be aware of and thus understand the nature and implications of each measure.

  We are, in principle, in favour of police co-operation and co-operation in asylum matters. GOG is not unduly concerned about the prospect of ECJ jurisdiction over individual cases.

Letter from the Chief Secretary, Government of Gibraltar, to the FCO, 23 February 1999

GIBRALTAR: SCHENGEN PARTICIPATION

  Thank you for your letter of 17 February 1999.

  You explain that UK Ministers intend to make an announcement shortly about the broad aspects of the new free movement Chapter and the existing Schengen acquis and that this will be followed by a letter to the EU Presidency indicating which individual provisions of the acquis the UK will wish to opt into. Although you have undertaken to inform me of the outcome, it would be more helpful, indeed necessary, for us to have sight of what is being contemplated before anything is announced or issued in final form. It would be disappointing if we were not properly consulted towards the end of this rather tortuous process. You will recall that the Minister of State undertook to consult the Chief Minister fully from the start.

  This brings me directly to the next point. I am a little concerned that you should have simply taken note of Gibraltar's wish to participate in all parts of Schengen in which the UK takes part. You know that our interest in this respect is of fundamental importance. Moreover, given that you confirm later on in the letter that Gibraltar cannot legally participate in Schengen measures when the UK does not, it follows by definition that we should join with the UK on all the Schengen measures to which UK opts into. I cannot but stress this point which I set out in my letter to you of 27 November 1998. I would welcome early reassurance from you on this.

  On post-boxing, I would refer you to my letter of 9 February 1999 to Alison MacMillan regarding the proposed "post-box" wording on the European Company Statute Regulation. As you know, this is the latest in a series of suggestions for a post-box formula. I think that we may have reached the stage where we cannot simply continue to be reactive to compromise wording and we should therefore finalise a position.

  I look forward to your reply and do let me know when you are closer to paying us a visit.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1999
Prepared 17 May 1999