Select Committee on International Development Minutes of Evidence


Letter published in European Voice, 15-21 October 1998

  Some recent media reports have given the impression that there is no financial control within the EU institutions and that is why there are cases of fraud.

  As non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working also in the field of emergency aid, we would like to comment on the present events because they affect the credibility of the EU and, indirectly, of all those who are co-operating with it.

  The allegations of corruption concerning a civil servant of ECHO, the European Commission Humanitarian Office, have had political and media consequences which are having a negative effect on the image of the considerable efforts by the European humanitarian action, as a whole, in its efforts to save thousands of lives among populations in distress.

  Humanitarian actions by NGOs and other humanitarian organisations (the Red Cross, United Nations agencies), although conducted in difficult emergency situations on the ground, have always been accountable. When these actions have been financed partly or totally by ECHO, they have been carried out through a rigorous framework partnership contract.

  This agreement is based on a prior thorough assessment of the partner's capability and accountability, subsequent quick allocation of funds in emergencies and a detailed control of expenditures ex post facto.

  All documents are kept by NGOs in their headquarters and made available for frequent audits (and evaluations and financial controls) carried out by the Commission, as well as by national authorities.

  The European Parliament's proposal aimed at putting in reserve all the allocations for emergency humanitarian action in the EU budget for 1999 (which will be debated by the Parliament on 20 October, with a vote on 22 October) remains unacceptable for NGOs because it effectively means that future victims of disaster are taken hostage.

  To conclude, the new proposals to set up an independent body to fight against fraud within the EU institutions would seem to be an excellent way forward and one which would be widely welcomed by NGOs active in humanitarian action and development co-operation.

  An external anti-fraud body can hopefully help to combine both efficient management and greater transparency.

James Mackie

Executive Secretary

Liaison Committee of Development NGOs to the EU

Brussels


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1999
Prepared 5 August 1999