Select Committee on Northern Ireland Affairs Sixth Special Report



APPENDIX I

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

Letter to the Chairman of the Committee from the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland

I have read with interest the Committee's report on the impact of the 26 December 1998 storm on electricity supplies in Northern Ireland. The Committee is to be congratulated for producing a comprehensive and balanced overview of a matter of major importance to electricity consumers. Security of supply, particularly during the festive season and the winter months generally, is an entirely legitimate expectation of today's consumers, domestic as well as industrial. I have no doubt that the report will prove helpful to NIE and BT in finalising the action which requires to be taken to ensure that the widespread disruptions to power supplies and the allied failures in providing accurate supply information to consumers over the Christmas 1998 period are not repeated.

I am pleased to enclose the Government observations on the one recommendation in the report which falls within its remit. I trust that the Committee will find the response helpful. Northern Ireland Electricity plc and the Regulator will respond to those recommendations which relate to their responsibilities.
Marjorie Mowlam
4 October 1999

Government Observations

Introduction

The Government welcomes the Committee's Report. It provides a most helpful contribution to the debate in Northern Ireland on the steps which require to be taken to ensure that the widespread disruptions to power supplies and the allied failures in providing accurate supply information to consumers over the Christmas 1998 period are not repeated. Government fully supports the expectation of consumers— domestic, commercial and industrial—that all possible measures are taken to maintain supplies during periods of adverse weather.

Following the restructuring of the electricity industry in the early 1990s the role of Government in this area is strictly limited. Statutory responsibility for the protection of consumers in respect of continuity of supply and quality of support services rests with the independent electricity Regulator.

The Government has considered the Report in this light and has the following comments to offer on the Committee's one recommendation specific to its responsibilities. The number refers to the relevant paragraph in the Committee's Report.

Recommendation addressed to Government

71.  We therefore consider that the scope for using some of the £40 million to improve the resilience to storm damage of the overhead electricity supply network in Northern Ireland should be investigated. We recommend that, before any of the £40 million is allocated to reducing generation costs, a thorough study be carried out of the case for investigating some, at least, of that sum in strengthening the resilience to storm damage of the overhead supply network.

The scope for using some of the £40 million balance in the Government Support Fund for electricity consumers to improve the resilience to storm damage of the overhead electricity supply network in Northern Ireland has been investigated as requested by the Committee.

It may be helpful to recall the background to the establishment of the Government Support Fund which originally stood at £60 million. The clear conclusion of the public consultation exercise in Autumn 1995 was that the money should be used to (i) reduce electricity bills for all consumers and (ii) support additional energy efficiency measures.

The Department of Economic Development appointed external consultants to appraise a number of competing proposals for use of the £40 million, including the Committee proposal and a proposal from the Regulator to allocate the money to buy down existing generating capacity in Northern Ireland. The consultants have now reported to the Department and have concluded that the use of the money to improve the resilience of the overhead network would not represent best value for consumers. The consultants have endorsed the Regulator's proposal as the most sensible use of the money in the present circumstances.

The Department also consulted the Regulator and NIE on the Committee's proposal. The Regulator does not believe that a Government subvention is necessary to enable the required strengthening of the overhead network to be carried out. NIE, for its part, is not seeking a contribution from public funds to deliver its £38 million Action Plan announced on 4 February 1999. The Action Plan includes proposals to accelerate improvement to, and refurbishment of, the high voltage overhead network. The Chairman of the Consumer Committee for Electricity has also written to the Department to record her committee's support for the Regulator's alternative proposal.

After careful consideration, and taking into account the above factors, Government has concluded that using some of the £40 million as proposed by the Committee would not represent best value for consumers. Government is minded, as outlined in the Department of Economic Development consultation document "Vision 2010—Energy Action Plan" issued in July 1999, to allocate - subject to obtaining the necessary legal and financial clearances - the £40 million balance to buy down existing generating capacity.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1999
Prepared 18 November 1999