Previous Section Index Home Page


War Pensions

Mr. Crausby: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security which local authorities disregard war pensions but not war widows' pensions when assessing entitlement to housing benefit or council tax rebates. [111580]

Angela Eagle: The information is not available and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

We do not routinely collect this sort of information on discretionary local schemes for Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit as such schemes are funded from an authority's own resources.

Lone Parents

Mr. Paul Marsden: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will list the percentage of lone parents out of work for each year since 1992 for (a) Shrewsbury and Atcham and (b) Shropshire; and if he will make a statement. [111066]

Angela Eagle: The information is not available in the format requested. Such information as is available is as follows.

Lone parents on income support

Shrewsbury and AtchamShropshireGreat Britain
November 1992(68)--(68)--964,000
November 1993(68)--(68)--1,010,000
November 1994(68)--(68)--1,025,000
November 1995(68)--2,5001,046,000
November 1996(68)--2,6001,022,000
November 1997(68)--2,400982,000
November 19989002,400938,000
August 1999(69)9002,400940,000

(68) Data not available

(69) August 1999 are the latest figures available

Notes:

1. Sample size 5 per cent., therefore subject to sampling error

2. Lone parents are defined as single claimants with dependants who are not in receipt of the disability or pensioner premium

3. Shropshire County changed boundaries between 1998 and 1999. The Wrekin has been removed from figures prior to 1999 as this became a new unitary authority in 1999.

4. Figures for Shrewsbury and Atcham and Shropshire have been rounded to the nearest hundred; figures for GB are rounded to the nearest thousand.

Source:

Income Support Quarterly Statistical Enquiries, November 1992 to August 1999.


To help lone parents who are out of work and in receipt of Income Support the New Deal for Lone Parents offers advice and support with jobsearch, training, childcare and benefits. Since October 1998 over 100,000 lone parents have joined NDLP and one in three of these have obtained jobs. In addition, initiatives such as the National Childcare Strategy, the Lone Parent's Benefit Run-On and the Working Families Tax Credit are for the first time making work a viable option for many lone parents.

Average Incomes

Mr. Paul Marsden: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will list the average income per week per household for each year since 1992, for (a) Shrewsbury and Atcham and (b) Shropshire; and if he will make a statement. [111071]

28 Feb 2000 : Column: 181W

Angela Eagle: The latest figures published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) for household income by county are for 1995 and were published in Table 9 of Regional Accounts 1996: Part 2, Economic Trends No. 535, June 1998. Estimates for household income by region, up to 1997, were published in Regional Accounts 1997: Part 2, Economic Trends No.551, October 1999. Both of these publications are available in the House of Commons Library. No figures are available at constituency level.

The published figures are normally presented in terms of total gross annual household income per head of population. These converted to weekly averages, give for Shropshire from 1992 to 1995 of £166, £173, £184 and £197. These figures on incomes of the household sector are defined on a national accounts basis, which includes persons living in private households and in institutions. These figures have not been adjusted for inflation.

Pensions

Dr. Lynne Jones: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what information he has collected on the number of people who are members of occupational pension schemes that include provision for early retirement on grounds of ill health; and if he will make a statement on the impact of the introduction of stakeholder pensions on that number. [111454]

Mr. Rooker: The vast majority of occupational pension scheme members are part of schemes that include provision for early retirement on grounds of ill-health. Only around 1 per cent. of occupational pension scheme members have no such provision. This means that around 10 million people are covered by arrangements for early retirement on grounds of ill-health. We do not expect the introduction of stakeholder pensions to affect that number.



Pensioners

Mr. Webb: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will estimate, on the basis of his Department's Family Resources Survey, the number of male married pensioners under the age of 85 years who are receiving amounts of state retirement pension in excess of the rate of full basic state pension applicable to a pensioner of that age. [111239]

Mr. Rooker: In 1997-98 the number of male married pensioners aged under 85 in Great Britain receiving State Retirement Pension in excess of the full basic State pension was 2.27 million. This total includes 0.22 million pensioners between the ages of 80 and 85 who were in receipt of the 25p age addition.


28 Feb 2000 : Column: 182W

Independent Tribunal Service (Sutton)

Mr. Mackinlay: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security (1) how many staff were working in the office of the Independent Tribunal Service at Sutton on 4 January; [110756]

Angela Eagle: Administration of the Appeals Service (formally the Independent Tribunal Service) is the responsibility of the Chief Executive, Neil Ward. I have asked him to write to my hon. Friend.

Letter from N. D. Ward to Andrew Mackinlay, dated 9 March 2000:


Research Contracts

Dr. Harris: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security, pursuant to his answer of 1 February 2000, Official Report, column 552-53W, what conditions have been placed on the publication of research findings under the premise of clause 12.2 of his standard research contract; what was the subject of each such case; and what were the reasons for the conditions being imposed. [111702]

Mr. Rooker: No conditions have been placed on the publication of research findings under clause 12.2 of the standard Departmental research contract. All consent to publish has been given unconditionally.

Benefits Agency (Somerset)

Jackie Ballard: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will make a statement on recruitment and promotion of Benefits Agency staff in Somerset. [110831]

28 Feb 2000 : Column: 183W

Angela Eagle: This is a matter for Peter Mathison, the Chief Executive of the Benefits Agency. He will write to the hon. Member.

Letter from Peter Mathison to Jackie Ballard, dated 22 February 2000:



    The number of staff recruited by the BA in Somerset over the last 3 years is:


    1997: 36 staff (this includes 8 existing BA staff who transferred to Somerset)


    1998: 80 staff (this includes 3 existing BA staff who transferred to Somerset)


    1999: 162 staff (this includes 27 existing BA staff who transferred to Somerset)


    The number of BA staff from Somerset that have been promoted over the same period is:


    1997: 1 member of staff


    1998: 14 staff


    1999: 12 staff (of which 1 is still unposted)


    The high numbers recruited in 1999 are partially the result of Somerset District being a pilot for the ONE Project, and cover staff employed in the District together with other BA Units which are based in the Country of Somerset.


    It is anticipated that there will be further promotion and recruitment exercises in Somerset later this year.


    I hope this is helpful.

Jackie Ballard: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will make a statement on the impact which the projected Benefits Agency overspend will have on staff in Somerset. [110461]

28 Feb 2000 : Column: 184W

Angela Eagle: This is a matter for Peter Mathison, the Chief Executive of the Benefits Agency. He will write to the hon. Member.

Letter from Peter Mathison to Jackie Ballard, dated 22 February 2000:



    A conscious decision was taken at the beginning of the 1999/2000 financial year to maintain staffing levels at the agreed level in order to ensure we were in a position to update as much work as possible before the millennium, to minimise any potential disruption to service.


    This decision was reflected in the allocation of resources to the field network, including Somerset District, and was agreed shortly after the start of the financial year. This strategy helped the Agency in service delivery and also to maintain and improve standards through the year.


    However, indicators were that unless some action was taken in the latter part of the year to reduce costs, the total expenditure for the Agency would exceed our annual budget allocations.


    Such measures, undertaken in all areas included:


    no overtime working [except in exceptional circumstances]


    minimal use of casual staff


    no recognition payments and the deferral of incentive payments


    to defer posting recruited staff until April 2000


    deferral of mandatory and non-mandatory training


    Somerset District, in line with other local districts, took these measures to ensure the Agency lived within it's budget while continuing to maintain service to the public.


    At the outset of the year a resource allocation was made to Somerset which allowed for an average 371.49 whole-time equivalent staff to be employed compared with the 1998/99 average of 347.13, an increase of over 24 staff for the year.


    Staffing on mainstream District business is currently still running above the 1999/2000 allocation of 371.49 and is expected to do so until the end of March when the anticipated position will be 385.27.


    I hope this is helpful.