Previous Section Index Home Page


Child Protection

Mr. Burnett: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department for the last three years for which figures are available, what was the average time taken to process a criminal record check under child protection arrangements (a) per police force area and (b) in total; and if he will make a statement. [114734]

Mr. Charles Clarke: The table shows information in relation to checks conducted by police forces in England and Wales under the terms of Home Office Circular 47/1993. Arrangements in Scotland and Northern Ireland are a matter for the respective Secretaries of State.

17 Mar 2000 : Column: 371W

Average time taken for police forces to complete an inquiry made under child protection guidance (Home Office Circular 47/1993) (A) where internal (i.e. force) inquiries are made, and (B) where inquiries outside the force are made, by Police Force Area 1996-99
Number of days

1996-97 1997-98 1998-99
ABABAB
Avon and Somerset4-1010-155-10(5)081-14
Bedfordshire13186211332
Cambridgeshire1-25+2-3141428
Cheshire3.678.87492-36-7
City of London17-21121-28190
Cleveland10-2110-21(4)10(4)10(8)1-7(8)1-14
Cumbria514716525
Derbyshire214721220
Devon and Cornwall51035562082
Dorset1-23-281-23-285-77-28
Durham1-27-4047-28714
Dyfed-Powys521613813-14
Essex6251121-271028
Gloucestershire827.5521523
Greater Manchester212847-6347-632828-42
Gwent225(5)02-13(5)0
Hampshire35211213
Hertfordshire3.422(6)4(6)19(6)3(6)16
Humberside3331033
Kent253757
Lancashire216216818
Leicestershire244-502(5)0
Lincolnshire181829
Merseyside(3)84(3)9431-21414-21
Metropolitan283312.617.91520
Norfolk4n/a28-4242-562-314-21
Northamptonshire122514261733
Northumbria474115-614-35
North Wales2842-567-2814-28+1-601-60
North Yorkshire2727210
Nottinghamshire101510301025
South Wales20309164860
South Yorkshire7-1014-287-1014-287-1014-28
Staffordshire1-5n/a1-5(5)01-3(5)0
Suffolk5154121426
Surrey12-3012-2112-42
Sussex421421521
Thames Valley1414(7)47(7)473537
Warwickshire83-2193-219-121-21
West Mercia728514+55-35
West Midlands328228435
West Yorkshire14-3014-3023.2525.42023
Wiltshire3-47-105-710-45-710.14

(3) Problem with computer system.

(4) Figures relate to 91 per cent. of checks processed for this period (Cleveland does not record the time taken to process each request).

(5) Force does not request checks from other forces.

(6) Force only records time taken from date form is input onto record log system to date reply sent. It does not refer to time taken from date the form was received.

(7) Figures only relate to 1 June 1997--31 March 1998. Thames Valley installed a new computer system which went live on 1 June 1997 and records details more efficiently.

(8) Figures relate to (a) 75 per cent. and (b) 30 per cent. of checks processed for this period (Cleveland does not record the time taken to process each request).


17 Mar 2000 : Column: 373W

17 Mar 2000 : Column: 373W

Mr. Burnett: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many criminal record checks were carried out under child protection arrangements in each month in each of the last three years for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement. [114735]

Mr. Charles Clarke: The available information is set out in the following table, which shows numbers of checks carried out by police forces in England and Wales under the terms of Home Office Circular 47/93. Arrangements in Scotland and Northern Ireland are matters for the respective Secretaries of State.

Criminal record checks carried out on behalf of local authorities, statutory health bodies, schools and further education establishments (Home Office Circular 47/93), by Police Force Area 1996-99

1996-971997-981998-99
Avon and Somerset24,48728,69827,580
Bedfordshire7,7458,5369,128
Cambridgeshire7,2839,76515,498
Cheshire16,69713,37415,411
City of London692802574
Cleveland6,7107,70910,452
Cumbria4,7366,7816,813
Derbyshire9,3319,83110,268
Devon and Cornwall21,18824,63822,736
Dorset22,47924,79230,231
Durham12,99915,33917,456
Dyfed-Powys11,13512,67510,275
Essex15,94615,74816,764
Gloucestershire6,2296,37311,591
Greater Manchester37,24436,06132,766
Gwent4,7077,5017,025
Hampshire29,93534,56436,612
Hertfordshire10,4337,9828,543
Humberside13,45414,91516,917
Kent17,60318,95322,705
Lancashire20,04121,80121,751
Leicestershire7,5437,89320,210
Lincolnshire7,1808,06412,205
Merseyside15,48218,20316,170
Metropolitan75,80491,14692,608
Norfolk9,4449,058n/a
Northamptonshire7,8648,5048,802
Northumbria18,60122,02923,614
North Wales11,95512,25912,893
North Yorkshire7,6289,02410,053
Nottinghamshire9,93910,13213,123
South Wales11,41115,08215,247
South Yorkshire10,46012,16912,631
Staffordshire8,3119,29712,407
Suffolk5,2495,2796,115
Surrey11,30212,36112,711
Sussex15,48318,20419,974
Thames Valley(9)37,48721,42231,079
Warwickshire5,5996,7476,943
West Mercia18,23922,06625,631
West Midlands37,15240,32038,023
West Yorkshire16,16318,22918,591
Wiltshire7,6668,4399,389
Total657,036712,765769,515

(9) Figures only relate to 1 June 1997 to 31 March 1998. Thames Valley installed a new computer system which went live on 1 June 1997 and records details more efficiently--previous records only kept on paper and not as reliable.

Note:

n/a = Figures are not available. Norfolk have ceased collecting these statistics.


17 Mar 2000 : Column: 374W

17 Mar 2000 : Column: 375W

Mr. Burnett: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent representations he has received concerning delays in the issuing of criminal records checks on individuals under child protection arrangements; and if he will make a statement. [114733]

Mr. Charles Clarke: We have received several letters and telephone calls over the past year concerning delays in obtaining criminal record checks. Under arrangements agreed with the Home Office, police forces in England and Wales aim to reply to employers and other agencies within 10 days, unless inquiries need to be made of other forces in which case the aim is to reply within three weeks. However, these targets are subject to the allocation of resources within each police force which is the responsibility of the Chief Constable.

Arrangements in Scotland and Northern Ireland are a matter for the respective Secretaries of State.

City Status

Mr. Bob Russell: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what provisions exist for a city to have its title and status removed. [114882]

Mr. Mike O'Brien: Apart from those cities that enjoy city status by ancient prescriptive usage, city status is an honour conferred by the Sovereign by Letters Patent. As it is a matter for the Royal Prerogative, the Sovereign can strip a city of its status, but this has never been done. Any city acknowledged by ancient prescriptive usage would be expected to have had that status confirmed by local government legislation during the last 100-150 years. It is possible, however, under local government re- organisation legislation, for a new local authority to lose the city status previously enjoyed by part of that authority.


Next Section Index Home Page