Previous SectionIndexHome Page



That provision may be made about the recovery of landfill tax from persons other than landfill site operators.

64. Relief from tax (incidental and consequential charges)

Resolved,


That it is expedient to authorise any incidental or consequential charges to any duty or tax (including charges having retrospective effect) which may arise from provisions designed in general to afford relief from taxation.

27 Mar 2000 : Column 185

PROCEDURE (MUTUAL SECURING OF EXCISE DUTIES)

Resolved,


PROCEDURE (DONATIONS TO CHARITY)

Resolved,


PROCEDURE (R&D TAX CREDITS)

Resolved,


PROCEDURE (MUTUAL EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION)

Resolved,


PROCEDURE (FUTURE TAXATION)

Resolved,


27 Mar 2000 : Column 186

FINANCE [Money]

Queen's Recommendation having been signified--

Resolved,


Bill ordered to be brought in upon the foregoing resolutions: And that the Chairman of Ways and Means, Mr. Chancellor of the Exchequer, Mr. Secretary Prescott, Mr. Secretary Straw, Mr. Secretary Blunkett, Mr. Secretary Milburn, Mr. Secretary Darling, Mr. Secretary Byers, Mr. Andrew Smith, Dawn Primarolo, Miss Melanie Johnson and Mr. Stephen Timms do prepare and bring it in.

Finance Bill

Mr. Stephen Timms accordingly presented a Bill to grant certain duties, to alter other duties, and to amend the law relating to the National Debt and the Public Revenue, and to make further provision in connection with Finance: And the same was read the First time; and ordered to be read a Second time tomorrow, and to be printed [Bill 97].

11.55 pm

Mr. St. Aubyn: On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Tonight, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury portrayed Mr. Peter Wyman as a personal tax adviser to a former Member, Mr. Neil Hamilton. Given that all that Mr. Wyman ever did was to give public, unpaid service to a Government deregulation task force when

27 Mar 2000 : Column 187

Mr. Hamilton was a Minister, has the Chief Secretary approached the Chair to correct a pernicious insinuation against a leading accountant in this country?

Mr. Deputy Speaker (Mr. Michael Lord): That is not a point of order for the Chair.

Mr. Stephen O'Brien (Eddisbury): On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. It is a separate point of order. Was it in order tonight for the Chief Secretary to traduce Mr. Peter Wyman's evidence to the Treasury last Friday?

Mr. Deputy Speaker: That matter was dealt with in an earlier debate. It is not a matter for the Chair now.

Mr. St. Aubyn: Further to that point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: No. It is not a matter for the Chair now.

DELEGATED LEGISLATION

Mr. Deputy Speaker: With the leave of the House, I will put motions 3 to 9 together.

Hon. Members: Object.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: In that case, we will do them one by one.

Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Standing Order No. 118(6) (Standing Committees on Delegated Legislation),

Financial Services


Question agreed to.

Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Standing Order No. 118(6) (Standing Committees on Delegated Legislation),

Industrial Development


Question agreed to.

Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Standing Order No. 118(6) (Standing Committees on Delegated Legislation),

Contracting Out


Question agreed to.

Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Standing Order No. 118(6) (Standing Committees on Delegated Legislation),

27 Mar 2000 : Column 188

Social Security


Question agreed to.

Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Standing Order No. 118(6) (Standing Committees on Delegated Legislation),

Local Government Finance


Question agreed to.

Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Standing Order No. 118(6) (Standing Committees on Delegated Legislation),

Local Government Finance


The House divided: Ayes 275, Noes 44.


Next Section

IndexHome Page