Previous Section Index Home Page


DERA

Mr. Key: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many graduate job applications were made and how many jobs were available at DERA in (a) 1997, (b) 1998 and (c) 1999; and how many he expects for 2000. [127605]

Dr. Moonie: This is a matter for the Chief Executive of the Defence Evaluation and Research Agency. I have asked the Chief Executive to write to the hon. Member.

27 Jun 2000 : Column: 436W

Letter from John Chisholm to Mr. Robert Key, dated 27 June 2000:



YearNumber of applications receivedNumber of vacanciesAppointed
1997-983,533Up to 300242
1998-994,245Up to 300242
1999-20004,721Up to 500457


Major Andrew Harrison

Mr. Maude: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) if his Department has been in contact with Major Andrew Harrison; [127988]

Mr. Hoon: I refer the right hon. Member to the reply I gave the hon. Member for Chingford and Woodford Green (Mr. Duncan Smith) on 22 June 2000, Official Report, column 243W. The Foreign Secretary and I are monitoring the situation very closely. We are satisfied that everything possible is being done to ensure Major Harrison's safety and welfare.

US Airborne Laser

Ann Clwyd: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what (a) information exchange and (b) co-operation there has been between his Department and the US (i) Department of Defense and (ii) State Department concerning the US Airborne Laser. [126944]

Mr. Hoon: The Ministry of Defence has received limited information from the Department of Defense on the US Airborne Laser programme. There has been no discussion or co-operation on this matter between the MOD and the Department of State.

Staff Secondments

Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list the senior members of his Department's staff who have been seconded to (a) UK and (b) non-UK companies in (i) 1995-96 and (ii) 1996-97; what posts they held in his Department; what was the cost to his Department of the secondments; and if he will make a statement. [127231]

Dr. Moonie: Details of Ministry of Defence senior civil servants seconded to companies in 1995-96 and 1996-97 and the costs to the Ministry of Defence are given as follows.

1995-96

CompanyRole in MOD prior to secondmentCost
British Railways Board--(UK)(1)Secretariat to the Adjutant General£15,000
Docklands Light Railway Ltd.--(UK)(1)Director IT (Policy)Nil--fully funded by DLR
Opportunities for People with Disabilities(1)Assistant Director, Ship Refitting£60,000 (approximate annual cost)
Raytheon (non-UK)(1)Director (Commercial) Defence Export Services OrganisationNil--fully funded by Raytheon

(1) These secondments continued into 1996-97


27 Jun 2000 : Column: 437W

27 Jun 2000 : Column: 437W

1996-97

CompanyRole in MODCost
Avery Berkel--(UK)Directorate (Finance and Secretariat) Weapons and Electronic SystemsNil--fully funded by Avery Berkel
BAe--(UK)Deputy Chief of Defence Procurement (Support)Nil--fully funded by BAe

27 Jun 2000 : Column: 437W

27 Jun 2000 : Column: 437W

HEALTH

Cancer Treatment

Mr. Hammond: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what percentage of urgent referrals by general practitioners of patients with suspected cancer he estimates were seen by cancer specialists in the most recent period for which figures are available. [125256]

Yvette Cooper: Since April 1999, we have set the standard that patients with suspected breast cancer will be offered an appointment with a specialist within two weeks of their general practitioner making an urgent referral. Table 1 shows that in the most recent period (January to March 2000) 96 per cent. of patients referred urgently received an appointment with a specialist within 14 days where the hospital received the referral within 24 hours of the GP deciding to refer. Table 2 shows that nearly 80 per cent. of patients were seen within two weeks where the referral was received outside 24 hours of the GP deciding to refer.

By December 2000 this high quality service will be extended to thousands of other worried patients as the standard is introduced for all cases of suspected cancer requiring urgent investigation.


Table 1: Urgent referrals received within 24 hours of the GP deciding to refer the patient

Waiting time from urgent referral by their GP to first outpatient appointment
Region0-14 daysMore than 14 daysPercentage seen within 14 days
Northern and Yorkshire1,9168795.7(2)(96.6)
Trent1,7284097.7(2)(98.2)
West Midlands3,2535998.2(2)(95.3)
North West1,84110694.6(2)(92.2)
Eastern1,2463297.5(2)(98.9)
London1,8878995.5(2)(97.1)
South East2,47222391.7(2)(95.2)
South West1,9532298.9(2)(99.7)
England16,29665896.1(2)(96.4)


27 Jun 2000 : Column: 438W

Table 2: Referrals not received within 24 hours of the GP deciding to refer the patient

Waiting time from urgent referral by their GP to first outpatient appointment
Region0-14 daysMore than 14 daysPercentage seen within 14 days
Northern and Yorkshire33212273.1(2)(77.9)
Trent52616676.0(2)(65.6)
West Midlands4186886.0(2)(87.6)
North West77623177.1(2)(69.1)
Eastern2633388.9(2)(86.1)
London75719479.6(2)(73.1)
South East40211777.5(2)(84.0)
South West2393487.5(2)(95.8)
England3,71396579.4(2)(76.7)

(2) Previous quarter


GP Practices (Patient Proximity)

Caroline Flint: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what definition he uses of a reasonable distance when determining access to a GP practice. [124642]

Mr. Denham: Subject to local planning decisions, it is for health authorities to determine, on a case-by- case basis, whether a surgery meets the reasonable expectations of its users and carers. Travelling distances are an important consideration, but we would expect travelling times, the availability and proximity of public transport and other services (such as National Health Service dispensing) to be taken into account.

East Midlands Ambulance Service

Mr. Todd: To ask the Secretary of State for Health further to his answer of 28 February 2000, Official Report, column 76W, on the East Midlands Ambulance Service, when improved control technology for the East Midlands Ambulance Service Trust will be implemented; and how long the process of approval for the project has taken since first submission by the trust. [127011]

Ms Stuart: The National Health Service Executive has been working with the East Midlands Ambulance Service Trust since March 1999 on the process to approve the business case for the procurement of improved control technology. In order that the approval process can move forward as quickly as possible, the trust is currently working to address the concerns which have been highlighted in their latest business case submission. Approval will be granted only if these concerns are met.

27 Jun 2000 : Column: 439W

If the scheme is commissioned, the trust's project plan suggests that the phased integrated implementation of the new technology will be achieved in around seven months for Leicestershire and eight and a half months for Derbyshire.


Next Section Index Home Page