Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Mr. Matthew Taylor: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many times in each year since 1994 his Department has been notified of a ministerial direction as provided for in the procedures set out in paragraphs 12 to 15 of the Treasury document, entitled "The Responsibilities of an Accounting Officer"; and if he will make a statement. [130312]
Mr. Andrew Smith [holding answer 13 July 2000]: The Treasury has been notified of the following number of directions, under the procedures set out in paragraphs 12 to 15 of the Treasury document entitled "The Responsibilities of an Accounting Officer".
Year | Number of directions |
---|---|
1990 | 1 |
1991 | 2 |
1992 | 4 |
1993 | 1 |
1994 | 0 |
1995 | 5 |
1996 | 0 |
1997 | 2 |
1998 | 5 |
1999 | 5 |
2000 | 1 |
Mr. Paul Marsden: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what estimate he has made of the number of new jobs which will be created in Shrewsbury and Atcham in 2000-01; [131140]
Miss Melanie Johnson: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician. I have asked him to reply.
Letter from John Pullinger to Mr. Paul Marsden, dated 24 July 2000:
Mr. Blizzard: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) how much debt owed by poor countries has been cancelled by the United Kingdom since May 1997; [130813]
24 Jul 2000 : Column: 484W
Miss Melanie Johnson: The total amount of debt relief agreed to date under the HIPC Initiative is in excess of $16 billion. Since May 1997, the UK has provided in the region of £250 million of debt relief to the heavily indebted poor countries. With the additional 11 countries expected to qualify under the HIPC initiative by the end of the year, the UK will have provided approximately £660 million in debt forgiveness. This is in addition to the £400 million of relief provided prior to May 1997 in the context of multilateral rescheduling agreements.
Mr. Cousins: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what plans he has to change the tax rules on compulsory annuitisation of money purchase pensions. [130824]
Miss Melanie Johnson [holding answer 17 July 2000]: I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Northavon (Mr. Webb) on 29 November 1999, Official Report, column 78W.
Mr. Blizzard: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what assessment he has made of the effect on employment in rural areas of the introduction of the proposed aggregates tax; [131609]
(3) how the proposed aggregates tax will differentiate between quarrying operations with good and bad environmental performance; [131613]
(4) what assessment he has made of the benefits of linking the taxation of aggregates to environmental performance of quarrying operators; [131611]
(5) if he will exempt some quarrying operations from the proposed aggregates tax on the basis of defined environmental targets. [131612]
Mr. Timms: The aggregates levy is based on independent research which verified that there are significant environmental costs associated with quarrying, including noise, dust, visual intrusion, loss of amenity and damage to biodiversity. The Government decided to address these costs through the introduction of the aggregates levy. It will be introduced at a uniform rate in order to keep it simple and to give a clear signal to purchasers of primary aggregates to use more sustainable materials. It will reward quarry operators who invest in equipment for recycling, and ensure that all users of aggregates are taking responsibility for the costs that the production of their inputs imposes on the rest of society. This is consistent with the polluter pays principle.
There would be a number of practical difficulties with a levy which attempted to differentiate between quarries with different environmental performance. These relate to assessing compliance, defining environmental performance, the treatment of imports, EU state aids rules and UK competition policy. A uniform levy was therefore considered to be the most viable option.
24 Jul 2000 : Column: 485W
All the revenues raised from the levy will be recycled back to business through a cut in employer National Insurance Contributions (NICs) and a new 'Sustainability Fund' aimed at delivering local environmental benefits. It is not possible to say precisely what the effect of the levy, the cut in employer NICs and the Sustainability Fund will be on the aggregates and construction industries, since this will depend, among other things, on future employment trends and the degree to which firms switch to recycled materials.
Mr. Denzil Davies: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many owners of pleasure yachts have been prosecuted in the last 12 months for which figures are available for the unlawful use of rebated heavy oil. [131608]
Mr. Timms: Private pleasure craft (including yachts) are not road going vehicles and as such qualify to use rebated heavy oil as motor fuel.
Burning oil which is fully rebated is not allowed for use as motor fuel. I am not aware of any prosecutions of pleasure yacht owners for such misuse in the past 12 months.
Mr. Beggs: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many seizures there have been of smuggled fuel and tobacco products in Northern Ireland in the last 12 months; and if he will make a statement. [129861]
Dawn Primarolo [holding answer 19 July 2000]: I refer the hon. Gentleman to the answer given to the hon. Member for East Londonderry (Mr. Ross) on 5 July 2000, Official Report, column 201W.
18,585,438 cigarettes have been seized.
Mr. Berry: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what the average annual net disposable income was, at 2000 prices, calculated on the basis of Table 8.2 in the annual reports of the Family Expenditure Survey, in the
24 Jul 2000 : Column: 486W
lowest and highest quintiles in each year from 1990 to 1999, only for households with children in those quintiles; and how many and what proportion of the population households in each quintile represented; [131960]
Miss Melanie Johnson: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician. I have asked him to reply.
Letter from John Pullinger to Mr. Roger Berry, dated 24 July 2000:
24 Jul 2000 : Column: 485W
Lowest 20 per cent. | Highest 20 per cent. | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Disposable income (£) | Percentage change | Gross income (£) | Percentage change | Disposable income (£) | Percentage change | Gross income (£) | Percentage change | |
1990(1) | 3,560 | 0 | 3,790 | 0 | 31,100 | 0 | 39,900 | 0 |
1991(1) | 3,900 | 10 | 3,950 | 4 | 33,500 | 8 | 42,900 | 8 |
1992(1) | 3,730 | -4 | 3,790 | -4 | 31,400 | -6 | 40,900 | -5 |
1993(1) | 3,900 | 5 | 3,940 | 4 | 32,700 | 4 | 42,800 | 5 |
1994-95 | 4,060 | 4 | 4,110 | 4 | 33,500 | 2 | 44,400 | 4 |
1995-96 | 4,290 | 6 | 4,350 | 6 | 34,300 | 2 | 45,500 | 2 |
1996-97 | 4,360 | 2 | 4,410 | 1 | 36,800 | 7 | 47,800 | 5 |
1997-98 | 4,520 | 4 | 4,580 | 4 | 39,200 | 7 | 51,000 | 7 |
1998-99 | 4,780 | 6 | 4,890 | 7 | 42,000 | 7 | 55,000 | 8 |
(1) In 1994-95 the Family Expenditure Survey moved from a calendar year basis to a financial year basis
Source:
ONS, Family Expenditure Survey 1990 to 1993 and 1994-95 to 1998-99
24 Jul 2000 : Column: 487W
Disposable income | Gross income | |
---|---|---|
1998-99 | ||
Lowest 20 per cent. | 4,790 | 4,870 |
Highest 20 per cent. | 42,000 | 55,100 |
Source:
ONS, Family Expenditure Survey 1998-99
Next Section | Index | Home Page |