Previous Section Index Home Page


Alcohol

Mr. Ben Chapman: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his answer of 21 July 2000, Official Report, columns 362-63W, (1) if he will assess the impact of the controls added to the drinks industry's code of practice on the merchandising and packaging of alcoholic drinks; [134074]

Mr. Mike O'Brien: The Portman Group's Code of Practice, which is supported by the overwhelming majority of companies involved in the manufacture and sale of alcoholic drinks, has provided real and substantial benefits. The numbers of complaints and upheld complaints have both fallen; the findings of the independent panel, set up by the Group to consider complaints of breaches of the code, have enjoyed a high degree of compliance; and the Group's system of Retailer Alert Bulletins, advising retailers not to stock offending products in their original packaging, has reduced their availability to the public.

Other industry initiatives, including the development and distribution of proof of age cards, should be commended.

Nevertheless, it is a cause for great concern that, as separate research studies show, large numbers of children under 18 are able to buy alcohol, both in pubs and in retail outlets. It is for this reason that we have strongly supported the provisions strengthening the law on under-age sales included in the Private Member's Bill introduced by my hon. Friend the Member for Pudsey (Mr. Truswell); and that we have proposed to bring forward further measures to deal with the problem, including the test purchasing of alcohol, as set out in our White Paper "Time for Reform".

23 Oct 2000 : Column: 45W

Mr. Ben Chapman: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what discussions he has had with representatives of the drinks industry on the application of the code of practice on the naming of alcoholic products. [133972]

Mr. Mike O'Brien: I meet representatives, which may include the Portman Group, from time to time, to discuss matters of current interest, which may include the operation of the Group's code of practice on the naming, packaging and merchandising of alcohol drinks.

Mr. Ben Chapman: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his answer of 21 July 2000, Official Report, columns 362-63W, about merchandising and packaging of alcoholic drinks, (1) what assessment he has made of the extent to which the provision in the Code of Practice about avoiding artificially bright colours in the product and the packaging has been implemented; [134071]

Mr. Mike O'Brien: Since September 1997, there have been five complaints that alcoholic products or their packaging have been more likely to appeal to under-18s than adults by reason of artificially bright colours. Of these complaints, two have been upheld by the independent complaints panel for the Portman Group's code of practice.

The panel has also upheld two complaints (one relating to the same product as one of the complaints mentioned above) where a product's texture contributed to its excessive appeal to under-18s.

It is a matter for the panel to decide how to take relevant factors such as texture into account when considering the question of a product's appeal to under-18s.

I understand that the code is likely to be reviewed next year.

23 Oct 2000 : Column: 46W

Pedal Cycles

Mr. Ben Chapman: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Great Grimsby (Mr. Mitchell) of 26 June 2000, Official Report, columns 384-86W, if he will call for reports on the reasons for the absence of fixed penalties for carrying more than one person on a pedal cycle in (a) Avon and Somerset, (b) Bedfordshire, (c) Cambridgeshire, (d) Cheshire, (e) Derbyshire, (f) Durham, (g) Essex, (h) Gloucestershire, (i) Hertfordshire, (j) Humberside, (k) the City of London, (l) the Metropolitan Police area, (m) Norfolk, (n) Northamptonshire, (o) North Yorkshire, (p) Nottinghamshire, (q) South Yorkshire, (r) Staffordshire, (s) Surrey, (t) Sussex, (u) Warwickshire, (v) the West Midlands and (w) West Yorkshire, between 1 August and 31 December 1999. [134070]

Mr. Charles Clarke: The issuing of fixed penalties for cycling offences is an operational matter for individual chief officers of police. Data from Essex and Humberside have now been received and show that two and three fixed penalties were issued respectively for carrying more than one person on a pedal cycle for the period August to December 1999. Data have also now been received from West Yorkshire and show that one fixed penalty was issued for carrying more than one person on a pedal cycle for the period November to December 1999. Cambridgeshire cannot supply relevant data. The remaining forces have indicated that no fixed penalty notices were issued. I have no plans to call for reports in this instance from the forces referred to by my hon. Friend the Member for Great Grimsby (Mr. Mitchell).

Mr. Ben Chapman: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Great Grimsby (Mr. Mitchell), of 26 June 2000, Official Report, columns 384-86W, if he will call for a report on the reason for the absence of fixed penalties for cycling on pedestrian footways in West Yorkshire between 1 August and 31 December 1999. [134069]

Mr. Charles Clarke: The issuing of fixed penalties for cycling offences is an operational matter for individual chief officers of police. Data from West Yorkshire have now been received and show that two fixed penalties were issued for the offence of cycling on the pavement in the period November to December 1999. No data are available for the period August to December 1999.

23 Oct 2000 : Column: 45W

New fixed penalty offences--Number of substantive tickets issued, England and Wales, August to December 1999

Police forceCarrying more than one person on pedal cycleCycling on the footway (pavement)Registration mark defectiveOvertaking at pelican, zebra or puffin crossingDriving on footway (pavement)Total
Avon and Somerset--19127716169
Bedfordshire------------
Cambridgeshire(5)--
Cheshire--687602155
Cleveland1544--14
Cumbria21232--450
Derbyshire--35--311
Devon and Cornwall12820--453
Dorset179247111
Durham--714--122
Essex27623615320
Gloucestershire--2531--662
Greater Manchester2381265(2)n/a171
Hampshire152922--147
Hertfordshire--1111423130
Humberside319353161
Kent24884239175
Lancashire2865--41116
Leicestershire11330--2 46
Lincolnshire91511813146
London, City of--105--1025
Merseyside1183--527
Metropolitan Police--29109228168
Norfolk(3)--811111
Northamptonshire--236----38
Northumbria121323966
North Yorkshire--1833253106
Nottinghamshire--5146--2153
South Yorkshire--112191261303
Staffordshire(3)--3274--34
Suffolk25330----85
Surrey--13781496
Sussex--155----20
Thames Valley18----211
Warwickshire--216--220
West Mercia1368745133
West Midlands--4121118
West Yorkshire(4)1----225
Wiltshire--617--124
Dyfed-Powys--7----18
Gwent----291131
North Walesn/an/a----3434
South Wales--411--3853
Total (42 forces)346652,2081443773,428

(2) Included in column 2

(3) October to December only

(4) November to December only

(5) Figures not available


23 Oct 2000 : Column: 47W

23 Oct 2000 : Column: 47W


Next Section Index Home Page