Previous Section Index Home Page


Pensioner Support

Mr. Cousins: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will list the total expenditure on pensioner support in each year since 1996-97, with an estimate for

27 Nov 2000 : Column: 436W

2000-01 and 2001-02 on the basis of proposals in the pre-Budget report, with a breakdown in (a) cash and (b) annual percentage share terms for (i) universal contribution based, (ii) universal but not based on contribution eligibility, (iii) income-related contribution and (iv) income-related but not based on contribution eligibility benefits. [140536]

Mr. Rooker: The information is in the table.

£ millionPercentage
All benefits for the elderly
1996-9740,808100.0
1997-9842,577100.0
1998-9944,502100.0
1999-200047,774100.0
2000-0150,428100.0
2001-0254,171100.0
Contributory benefits
1996-9732,10678.7
1997-9833,66479.1
1998-9935,68480.2
1999-200037,83279.2
2000-0138,85177.0
2001-0242,07477.7
Non-contributory benefits
1996-97450.1
1997-982360.6
1998-992390.5
1999-20009462.0
2000-012,0914.2
2001-021,6793.1
Income-related contributory benefits
1996-97None--
1997-98None--
1998-99None--
1999-2000None--
2000-01None--
2001-02None--
Income related non-contributory benefits
1996-978,65721.2
1997-988,67820.4
1998-998,57919.3
1999-20008,99618.8
2000-019,48618.8
2001-0210,41719.2

Notes:

1. Totals may appear not to sum due to rounding.

2. Information is consistent with pre-Budget Report Cm4917 and with Table 3 of the Social Security Departmental Report 2000, Cm 4614.

3. The benefits included in each category above are:

Contributory benefits: Retirement Pension (basic and earnings related) and Christmas Bonus for elderly recipients of contributory benefits.

Non-Contributory Benefits: Non-contributory Retirement Pension, Winter Fuel Payments, Concessionary TV licences and Christmas Bonus for recipients of qualifying non-contributory benefits.

Income-related contributory benefits: None

Income-related non-contributory benefits: Income Support/ Minimum Income Guarantee, Social Fund, Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit


Pension Credit

Mr. Flynn: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will publish in the Official Report a table

27 Nov 2000 : Column: 437W

corresponding to the table on page 30 of the consultation paper on the pension credit, showing the guaranteed (a) income top-up, (b) savings credit and (c) post-credit income for a person whose original income includes a basic pension at half the full rate. [140558]

Mr. Rooker: Under our proposals for the Pension Credit, single pensioners with incomes of between £77 and £135 a week will be rewarded. Income from a combination of different sources, including varying rates of the basic State Pension, will be aggregated when assessing entitlement to the Pension Credit.

Free Television Licence

Mr. Burstow: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will estimate the (i) cost and (ii) number of beneficiaries of extending the free television licence scheme to all households without a resident aged 75 years or over but with a resident in receipt of (a) invalid care allowance, (b) the higher rate care component of disability living allowance, (c) the higher rate mobility component of disability living allowance, (d) the higher rate care and/or the higher rate mobility component of disability living allowance, (e) invalid care allowance and/or the higher rate care component of disability living allowance and (f) invalid care allowance and/or the higher rate care and/or higher rate mobility component of disability living allowance. [140290]

Mr. Rooker: The information is in the table.

Cost (£ million)Beneficiaries
Invalid Care Allowance (ICA)30350,000
Higher Rate Care (HRC) component40400,000
Higher Rate Mobility (HRM) component1301,250,000
Higher Rate Care and/or Higher Rate Mobility1401,400,000
ICA and or Higher Rate Care70650,000
ICA and/or HRC and/or HRM1601,600,000

Notes:

1. Based on Disability Living Allowance administrative data May 2000 and Family Resources Survey data.

2. Cost rounded to the nearest 10 million, gainers to the nearest 50,000.


Winter Fuel Payment

Mr. Burstow: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will estimate the (i) cost and (ii) number of beneficiaries of extending the winter fuel payment scheme to all households without a resident aged 60 years or over but with a resident in receipt of (a) the higher rate care component of disability living allowance, (b) the higher rate mobility component of disability living allowance, (c) the higher rate care and the higher rate mobility component of disability living allowance, (d) the higher or medium rate of disability living allowance care component and (e) any form of disability living allowance. [140289]

Mr. Rooker: The information is as follows.

The estimates cost, and number of households to benefit if the winter fuel payment scheme was extended to all households without a resident aged 60 years or over but with a resident in receipt of the following benefits:

27 Nov 2000 : Column: 438W

Cost (£ million)Households benefiting
Higher Rate Care component50250,000
Higher Rate Mobility component130650,000
Higher Rate Care and Mobility component30150,000
Higher Rate or Middle Rate Care component130650,000
Any Disability Living Allowance (DLA)2401,200,000

Notes:

1. Based on DLA administrative data, May 2000 and Family Resources Survey data.

2. Cost rounded to the nearest ten million, gainers to the nearest fifty thousand.

3. Winter Fuel Payment is considered to be paid at £200 for gaining households.


Mr. Roy: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many pensioners in each parliamentary constituency are entitled to receive the winter fuel payment this year; and what the total amount paid out in each constituency will be. [139101]

Mr. Rooker: Information based on payments made so far this winter has been placed in the Library.

Mr. Burstow: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will estimate the (i) cost and (ii) number of beneficiaries of extending the Winter Fuel Payment scheme to all households without a resident aged 60 years or over but with a resident in receipt of Invalid Care Allowance and (a) the higher rate care component of Disability Living Allowance, (b) the higher rate mobility component of Disability Living Allowance, (c) the higher rate care and/or the higher rate mobility component of Disability Living Allowance, (d) the higher or medium rate of Disability Living Allowance care component and (e) any form of Disability Living Allowance. [140291]

Mr. Rooker: The information is as follows.

Estimated cost, and numbers of households to benefit if the Winter Fuel Payment (WFP) scheme was extended to all households without a resident aged 60 or over, but with a resident in receipt of Invalid Care Allowance and a resident in receipt of one of the following benefits:

Cost £ millionHouseholds benefiting
Higher Rate Care component20100,000
Higher Rate Mobility component20100,000
Higher Rate Care and/or Mobility component20100,000
Higher Rate Care or Middle Rate Care component30150,000
Any Disability Living Allowance (DLA)30150,000

Notes:

1. Based on DLA administrative data May 2000 and Family Resources Survey data.

2. Cost rounded to the nearest 10 million, gainers to the nearest 50,000.

3. WFP is considered to be paid at £200 for gaining households.


Mobility Allowance

Mr. Steen: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will uprate Mobility Allowance to match recent increases in the cost of petrol. [140288]

Mr. Bayley: The mobility component of Disability Living Allowance, which replaced mobility allowance in 1992, is uprated annually by the rate of inflation as measured by the movement in the retail prices index. The

27 Nov 2000 : Column: 439W

basket of goods used to calculate the retail prices index includes the cost of petrol, as well as the cost of taxi fares and other motoring costs. More generally, Disability Living Allowance is intended to act as a contribution to the extra costs associated with disability; it is not intended to underwrite specific costs, and it is up to the individual to decide how to use the money.


Next Section Index Home Page