---

Mrs. Jean Brett

Mr. Hinchliffe: To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to his answer of 12 July 2000, Official Report, column 578W, on Jean Brett, on what basis the Eastern Regional Office concluded that no further action need to be taken in respect of the case of Mrs. Jean Brett. [140589]

Ms Stuart: Following a request made by the Chief Medical Officer a review of the two clinical assessors reports from the Independent Review was carried out by the Eastern Regional Director of Public Health. On the basis of this review it was concluded that no further action needed to be taken.

Parliamentary Questions

Mr. Loughton: To ask the Secretary of State for Health when he will reply to the question tabled by the hon. Member for East Worthing and Shoreham of 17 March (Ref. 115126) regarding hospital waiting times. [140800]

Mr. Denham: I replied to the hon. Member on 17 October and placed copies of the information requested in the Library.

Nurses

Mr. Loughton: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many nurses (a) joined and (b) left the nursing profession in the NHS in each of the last 10 years. [140801]

Mr. Denham: These data are not collected centrally.

The United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visitors (UKCC) collects this information. The UKCC website is at: www.ukcc.org.uk (telephone number: 020 7333 6557/6558).

NORTHERN IRELAND

Departmental Employees (HIV)

Mr. Wigley: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will take steps to ensure that people who are HIV-positive do not suffer discrimination as a result of employment practices followed by his Department. [137790]

Mr. Mandelson: The Northern Ireland Office has a well established equal opportunities policy founded on the principle that people must have equality of opportunity for employment and advancement solely on the basis of their suitability for the work.

RUC Investigations

Mr. Donaldson: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he has received a report from the Chief

29 Nov 2000 : Column: 636W

Constable of the RUC about the recent deaths of Paddy Joe Quinn in Magherafelt and Joseph O'Connor in Belfast; and if he will make a statement. [138284]

Mr. Ingram: The Secretary of State receives regular briefings on security matters from the Chief Constable and his security advisers. It would not be appropriate to speculate who is responsible for these murders as the RUC investigation is still ongoing. If it becomes clear that the IRA were responsible for the murders of Patrick Joe Quinn and Joseph O'Connor it would have a direct impact on the Secretary of State's assessment of the IRA ceasefire.

Juvenile Justice Estate

Mr. Pickthall: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what plans he has for the juvenile justice estate. [141101]

Mr. Ingram: Custody is now reserved for the most serious and persistent juvenile offenders in Northern Ireland, which has led to a reduction both in the number of young people in custody and the length of time served. But it remains important to provide secure conditions for those juveniles who do receive custodial sentences, for the protection both of the public and of the juveniles themselves.

There are currently two "open" centres (Rathgael and St. Patrick's) and one "closed" site (Lisnevin) in the juvenile justice estate in Northern Ireland. None of the centres is fully satisfactory, and their total capacity (115 places) is considerably in excess of requirements. Since April 2000, I have therefore been consulting on how best to restructure the estate in order to provide a progressive and balanced regime that fully meets the needs of young people in custody, and to achieve the most effective use of public resources.

I am grateful to all those who responded to the consultation document. These responses recognised that changes were needed in the juvenile justice estate, with opinion fairly evenly divided between the one centre and two centre options. In considering the way forward, I have borne in mind that the accommodation must meet a number of needs. It should provide a safe and secure (but not oppressive) environment, since custody is reserved for the most serious and persistent offenders. It must cater for the diverse needs of different groups of juveniles. It must be child friendly and unthreatening. And it must also provide a progressive environment, without disruptive transfers around the system. A critical mass of inmates is needed to ensure the optimum provision of opportunities such as education and recreation.

I have therefore concluded that, for an estimated maximum population of 50 juveniles (but with a working population of less than this), the most appropriate option is for a single site, offering comprehensive educational and recreational provision and housing the population in small living units. A modern construction would allow the best design features to be included, delivering intrinsic security in a safe and relatively welcoming environment.

The existing accommodation fails to meet this requirement. Lisnevin provides the necessary security, but in an oppressive and outdated manner. The Criminal Justice Review, recommended its closure, and I agree with that. Both Rathgael and St. Patrick's provide relatively

29 Nov 2000 : Column: 637W

modern and bright living accommodation, but their campus-style environment does not offer the necessary security. Increasing security using the existing buildings would not represent the best opportunity to meet the needs of the population. The best option is therefore to make provision for a purpose-built modern facility on a single site.

I accordingly considered the scope for a greenfield site. However, I believe the additional costs and delay involved in this option would be prohibitive. A new build at Lisnevin is the least attractive option in terms of location.

I considered the site currently owned by the voluntary sector at St. Patrick's in West Belfast. While this is in a central location, the area is closely associated with one section of the community, and the perception is that it would not be fully accessible by the Protestant community. The voluntary sector in NI is precluded by law from the provision of secure care. In these circumstances it is more appropriate to have secure custody also delivered within the statutory sector. The St. Patrick's site is therefore not in my view the best option for the new centre. However, I am currently funding the delivery of community based diversionary projects at St. Patrick's and I intend to continue to do so and to discuss with management how these might be further developed to meet the needs of local young people.

Finally, I considered the site at Rathgael in Bangor. While the site has some shortcomings and may not be perceived by all as an entirely neutral location, it has successfully catered for the needs of young people from both sides of the community for some years. I have decided therefore that the future provision for custody of juveniles should be a purpose-built facility at Rathgael.

As indicated earlier, an important element in juvenile custodial provision is the maintenance of links with families. Every effort should be made to ensure that family links can be maintained and matured while the young person is in custody. This implies that innovative and progressive visiting arrangements must be provided. To facilitate this, purpose-built accommodation will be provided on site to facilitate overnight and weekend visits by family members. This will provide improved opportunities for visits by families from remote areas of Northern Ireland.

In line with the requirements of section 75 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998, I have arranged for an impact assessment to be carried out on this decision by an independent consultant. The consultant concluded that while there is some adverse impact on Catholic families, the level of this impact is not likely to be significant. I have considered the position in the round and concluded that the business arguments justify the decision and outweigh any negative impact.

DEFENCE

Cetaceans

Mr. Nigel Jones: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what research is being conducted into the effects of military activities on cetaceans. [139354]

29 Nov 2000 : Column: 638W

Dr. Moonie: Noise in the ocean has been recognised internationally as one of the potential problems for the marine environment. For this reason, we are actively involved in secondary research into the range of possible effects of sonar noise on cetaceans and other marine life. This involves collection of data in the public domain and analysing them to inform the way ahead on general policy and our approach to individual projects. We are supported in this work by leading independent experts both in the UK and the US. We also monitor relevant scientific and environmental research around the globe.

Additionally, guidelines on minimising disturbance to cetaceans at sea are issued to all Royal Navy and Royal Fleet Auxiliary vessels. These are also incorporated into the trials orders for Royal Navy and Royal Fleet Auxiliary vessels participating in exercises.

Defence Aviation Repair Agency

Mr. John Smith: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the annual cost is of maintaining the four sites within the Defence Aviation Repair Agency. [139331]

Mr. Spellar: The Defence Aviation Repair Agency's facilities management expenditure across its four sites in the financial year 1999-2000 was £22.6 million. This can be broken down as follows:

	£ million
Staff Costs	10.4
Site Costs(14)	9.8
Operations Costs(15)	0.6
Administration(16)	1.8

⁽¹⁴⁾ Estate, utilities, communications, depreciation, interest

⁽¹⁵⁾ IT, machinery maintenance, consumable materials

⁽¹⁶⁾ Travel, vehicles, training, insurance, office supplies

---