Select Committee on Agriculture Minutes of Evidence



Examination of witnesses (Questions 200 - 219)

MONDAY 14 FEBRUARY 2000

DR PAUL LEINSTER, MR NIGEL READER and DR MARK KIBBLEWHITE

Mr Marsden

  200. Can I ask a general question first of all? What are the IPPC targets with regard to agriculture?
  (Dr Kibblewhite) There are two types of production—pig and poultry—and there is a general requirement to consider the possible environmental impacts of those processes or those production units and to control those so that they do not cause significant damage or risk of harm to the environment. So there are no absolute numbers.

  201. Therefore, from what you are saying, there are no targets?
  (Dr Kibblewhite) No, no absolute numbers.

  202. So what are the success factors for its implementation?
  (Dr Leinster) The controls are based around the implementation of best available techniques, so it is through those best available techniques which will be, in England and Wales, informed by the European-wide BAT documents; those will be the standards which have to be implemented through the use of guidance documents in England and Wales. It is a process-led and process-controlled system.

  203. So the only success factors are complying with the standards?
  (Dr Kibblewhite) No.

  204. What are they, then?
  (Dr Kibblewhite) For example, if we look at ammonia emissions, then we do have data today on the level of ammonia emissions from units of these types. We can estimate what ammonia reduction could result from the introduction of best available techniques. We will also hopefully in the future be able to continue to monitor these, so that we can see whether there actually has been a reduction in ammonia releases, and then also through environmental scientific research assess what benefits that has brought to the environment. Those are the final success factors to improving the environment.

  205. So you are going to do that and you are going to publish it and do it for each pollutant, is that right?
  (Dr Kibblewhite) No, I think that we will be able to show that the application of best available techniques will have reduced ammonia. There is a great deal of scientific work going on on nitrogen deposition in the United Kingdom and, indeed, regionally. The results of this IPPC initiative will be factored into that and assessed within that framework.

  206. Forgive me cutting through this red tape and this bureaucracy, as I see it, but give me a yes or no answer. You are going to have success factors. Are you going to publish them from your own Environment Agency in order to demonstrate the success of the IPPC, yes or no?
  (Dr Leinster) Yes.

  207. Very well. Let me move on to interim arrangements. The IPPC regulations will not apply to current installations until 2003 for poultry and 2004 for pigs. My question is, why are these sectors coming under this scheme at different times?
  (Dr Leinster) It is to do with phasing of workload.

  208. So why poultry before pigs?
  (Dr Kibblewhite) I do not think there is a science to this. There are no types of processes coming forward from IPPC. Those are already covered, of course, under some regulations, so arguably perhaps some of those would come towards the end of the sequence, if what we are trying to do is take account of environmental risk; but that is where it has been decided that we—"we", the Agency—will operate in the timetable of it.

  209. You say that "it has been decided". Who has decided it?
  (Dr Leinster) The decision on the phasing in of sectors is for the DETR, not for the Agency.

  210. You are saying Ministers have decided this. It is not a difficult question. Who has decided, that is all I am asking?
  (Dr Leinster) The phasing in of sectors is decided by the DETR, so eventually by the Minister for the Environment.

  211. Right, thank you. The question has been partly answered previously about the introduction of this scheme and the phasing, I appreciate that, but how do you think you are coping with the introduction of this directive?
  (Dr Leinster) As I say, we realised that this was a considerable workload. There were new requirements. So, for example, within IPPC we now will have things like waste minimisation, restoration of sites, assessment of incidents and accidents, energy conservation, raw material usage, they are all new requirements within a regulatory framework. IPC does not cover those; IPPC does. In addition, there are these new areas which will be coming under regulation, so pig and poultry, food and drink will also be being regulated under an integrated regime for the first time. We realised that and established over two years ago now a project which will co-ordinate within the Agency the work on this. They have been carrying out a considerable amount of work. We have worked on application forms, the guidance documents, and how it is going to impact within the Agency. I think we are well advanced in our preparations.

Mr Jack

  212. How much is it going to cost your Agency to go from this interim to the actual up and running situation? How much have you put in your budget for this expenditure, because you are not recovering anything from anybody at the moment? How much is it costing?
  (Mr Reader) We have some grant in aid from the DETR to help with the setting up arrangement, so it is paying for the cost of the project.

  213. I actually asked how much.
  (Mr Reader) We have £600,000 per annum from the DETR to help with the process.

  214. When did the clock start running on that £600,000?
  (Mr Reader) Last year.

  215. Last year. And it covers what period then, right the way through to 2007?
  (Mr Reader) We have a small allocation from the DETR for next year but essentially that £600,000 comes to an end at the end of this financial year.

  216. So after that, unless you recover some costs from somebody, your budget is in deficit?
  (Mr Reader) Yes, effectively.

  217. How many extra people have you taken on to do all this mountain of work?
  (Dr Leinster) New people just now?

  218. Yes, or are you all working much harder?
  (Dr Leinster) We are all working much harder.

  219. So there have been no extra people despite the fact you are going to spend £600,000?
  (Dr Leinster) What we have done in the project is funded from that £600,000, so it is in fact over the last two years. It kicked in in April of 1998. That has funded the project. The project team is around ten people, so those ten people are the additional resource that we have made available for implementing IPPC.

  Mr Mitchell: Let us go back to Paul Marsden.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 6 March 2000