Select Committee on Agriculture Fourth Report


MEMORANDUM SUBMITTED BY MR H. E. G. ANDREWS, H. E. ANDREWS & SONS LTD (V9)

  As a small poultry producer I wish to inform the Members of the Agriculture Select Commitee of my grave concerns of the effects of the proposed legislation on our future. The UK poultry industry is unsupported and has to compete at world prices, therefore any proposal which would increase the financial burden to the industry, particularly during the current agricultural crisis, must be vigorously resisted.

  I make the following points to support my concerns.

    (a)  The Government has committed itself to deregulation, yet surely IPPC is a prime example of duplication, as the Local Environmental Health Officers already strictly monitor air, noise and water pollution and prosecute any violations. Areas of particular sensitivity being covered by ESAs or other such legislation.

    (b)  Many other EU Members have already stated that they will not be introducing yet more legislation into areas they consider already covered, and those countries which have not yet decided the issue have made it clear that there will be no "on-cost" to their own pig and poultry sectors.

    (c)  EU regulations and legislation are supposed to be proportionate to the problems they seek to address, yet the cost of this legislation to the pig and poultry sectors is totally disproportionate.

    (d)  If IPPC legislation is carried through and becomes law, any requirement to reduce emissions to below their current, generally accepted levels will result in an even greater demand for energy use to fuel the increase in heat usage and fanning requirements that would become necessary to achieve any reduction of these emissions.

    (e)  The UK Government requires higher animal welfare standards than any of our EU partners and any scrimping on energy usage would be in direct conflict with maintaining our high standards. With the industry being forced down the Dietary Enhancer free route, most independent poultry veterinarians agree this will lead to challenges to the environment requiring more heat and ventilation to maintain the welfare friendly standards.

  I urge you to reject the proposals.

4 January 2000


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 17 March 2000