Select Committee on Agriculture Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


Annex 1

Letter to the Rt Hon Nicholas Brown MP, MAFF Minister, from the Chief Executive of the BEIC

WELFARE OF LAYING HENS

  The British Egg Industry Council (BEIC), Compassion in World Farming (CIWF) and Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) are working together to ensure the smooth implementation of the recently adopted Council Directive (99/74/EC) laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. We strongly believe that UK Ministers should help the industry to take the action which will be required to achieve this aim.

  It is necessary to bear in mind that egg producers are always working on very narrow (or negative) margins and it is difficult for them to accumulate the capital investment required to move into new systems of production. This task is clearly made more difficult if the egg market is weak and depressed.

  We are convinced that it will be necessary for Ministers to ensure that the market is not undermined by cheap imported eggs or egg products produced to very different standards and that additional aid and help should be provided as follows:

    (a)  Grants towards the capital expenditure involved in moving to free range and perchery/barn production (consideration should be given to reducing the rate of grant over time to encourage the early movement out of conventional cages).

    (b)  Sensible enforcement of the IPPC Directive to avoid undue costs being imposed upon alternative systems of production (which all include the provision of litter).

    (c)  Reduction of planning constraints on the erection of new non-cage production units and on change of use from conventional cage units to light industrial use.

    (d)  Action by the Commission to see that the Directive is implemented throughout the EU thus preventing the market here from being undermined by cheap exports from non-complying units in eg Spain.

    (e)  An expansion of the WTO criteria so as to provide that eggs and egg products can only be traded between countries with the same welfare standards. Or, if this should prove to be non-negotiable, a refusal to make further reductions in the EU protection for eggs and egg products coupled with the imposition of additional levies on imports from third countries which do not have the same welfare rules for hens as the EU. Thus preventing the market here being undermined by cheap third-country imports.

    (f)  No reduction in the amount of land required by EU regulations for eggs to be labelled as "free-range" thus preventing the market here for free range being undermined by eg French imports from farms with a far lower land requirement.

    (g)  An early guidance note giving a clear interpretation of the Directive.

  We would welcome an opportunity to discuss these matters with Ministers.

  A copy of this letter goes to the Rt Hon Richard Caborn MP.

17 January 2000


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 4 July 2000