Select Committee on Agriculture Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


Letter to Baroness Hayman, Minister of State, MAFF from the British leather Confederation

  WITHDRAWAL OF OP SHEEP DIPS—CONCERN OF THE UK TANNING INDUSTRY

I am writing on behalf of the British Leather Confederation to express our concerns at the recent Government decision to withdraw organophosphate (OP) sheep dips. The British Leather Confederation is the trade association for the UK tanning industry and in this role represents a range of sheep skin processors. Our prime concern in this matter is to protect the quality of UK domestic skins, but from a wider perspective we believe that skin quality—in terms of the level of parasite damage found on skins—is a helpful indicator of the health and welfare status of the national flock.

  We already have evidence of dramatic increase (by around 60 per cent from 1991-95) in the number of skins damaged by parasites, following the progressive relaxation and abolition of compulsory sheep dipping in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Since then our members have reported that the level of skin damage has continued to increase. Two major sheep skin tanneries have closed in the last five years, and in each case the decline in the quality of raw material was a major contributory factor. Our overriding concern at present is that the withdrawal of OP dips could accelerate this decline and make a difficult situation even worse.

  The hide skin and leather sector in the UK regularly makes a positive contribution to the country's balance of payments (between £140 million and £200 million over the last three years in a volatile market) and the sector plays an important role adding value to a by product of the farming and meat industry. The value of the skin is influenced by the final use of the leather, and this in turn is dictated by the original hide and skin quality. In a volatile market, the annual value of UK sheep skins at the abattoir over the last three years has been in the range of £45 million to £130 million. Although influenced by market conditions, the annual loss to the production chain, from farmer to tanner, currently arising from parasite damage, has been estimated at £15 million to £20 million.

  Previous sheep dipping regimes and practices—based heavily on OPs—had the effect of controlling not only sheep scab, but also a wide range of other parasites such as blow fly, lice, ticks and keds. Some dips were also formulated to control mycotic dermatitis. Since then levels of parasite damage to skins have substantially increased, and although we are aware of alternative treatments, the OP products still have an important part in the farmer's armoury against parasites for a number of key reasons:

    1.  they are effective against a wide range of skin parasites, unlike the alternative products which have a more limited spectrum of effect. This also means that accurate veterinary diagnosis is advisable before using any of the alternatives;

    2.  the OP products can be used prophylactically, to treat and protect animals, whereas the alternatives are essentially treatments, with no significant protective effect, thus potentially allowing early re-infection with, for example, sheep scab;

    3.  there is more potential for misuse and/or underdosing with the alternative products, and, we understand, there are already instances of parasite resistance to a number of these products;

    4.  they represent the most economic treatment from the farmer's point of view;

    5.  while still representing an environmental challenge to sheep skin processors, in discharging their effluent, as well as to farmers, OP compounds are also considerably safer in environmental terms than the alternative synthetic pyrethroid dips which are estimated to be up to 100 times more toxic to aquatic life than the OPs.

  While we are aware of certain health and safety issues regarding the OP products, there are well established procedures throughout industry for dealing with hazardous materials and we do not see the OP products as significantly different.

  For all the reasons outlined above, we believe that the OP products still have a vital part to play in the control of skin parasites on sheep and that they should be allowed back into circulation as soon as practically possible.

1 February 2000

Raw Materials scar damage found at the pickle inspection

UK doubleface crust sort fault analysis—skins showing parasite damage (%), n = 8000/month

Parasitic Damage Stats

UK DOUBLEFACE CRUST SORT FAULT ANALYSIS
1995
MonthNo of Skins PDIM
July8,000386
August8,000535
September8,000775
October8,000736 135
November8,0001,117 221
December8,0001,200 245
Total48,0004,749 601
1996
MonthNo of Skins PDIM
July8,000435
August8,000461
September8,000841
October8,000825 160
November8,0001,314 299
December8,0001,358 311
Total48,0005,232 770
1997
MonthNo of Skins PDIM
July8,000433
August8,000620
September8,000995
October8,000934 142
November8,0001,356 187
December8,0001,575 221
Total48,0005,913 550
1998
MonthNo of Skins PDIM
July8,000458
August8,000562
September8,000841
October8,0001,213 175
November8,0001,196 311
December8,0001,734 356
Total48,0006,002 842
1999
MonthNo of Skins PDIM
July8,000489
August8,000711
September8,0001,115
October8,0001,058 112
November8,0001,517 98
December8,0001,654 178
Total48,0006,542 388
PD = Parasitic Damage
IM = Injection Marks




 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 23 May 2000