Select Committee on Agriculture Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 140 - 151)

WEDNESDAY 21 JUNE 2000

MR BRIAN BENDER, MR RICHARD CARDEN AND MR GEORGE TREVELYAN

  140. Business plans now being in place, roughly how long do you expect that process to take?
  (Mr Carden) The objectives for individuals should have been worked out by this stage in the year.

  141. Finally, there is a whole set of commitments which are made in the Plan which essentially relate to a more open service, is the heading, including outside experience and a whole range of laudable objectives. I just wondered if, in a few sentences—these are from page 45 onwards; there is a large number of them—briefly, we could be told how you are getting on with implementing these commitments?
  (Mr Bender) The honest and straight answer from me on that is that I have asked for a discussion with my Personnel Director in the very near future about the whole question of developing internal talent, including therefore the opportunities for internal talent outside. It is not a discussion I have yet managed to have.

  142. These remain aspirations really rather than achievements?
  (Mr Carden) There is not such a large gap between the present performance and targets; to take target 45, for example, 65 percent of MAFF's senior staff to have had experience outside the Civil Service by 2005, the milestone column records that we are already at 59 percent. I was very surprised at that figure and I personally queried it before coming to this session, but it is apparently so that 59 percent of our staff have had experience outside the home Civil Service already and we are going to move that percentage up. That is the aim.

  143. You picked one which is one side of it; may I pick one further? Commitment 46 says that you identified MAFF as the key inward secondment during 2000. That is happening now, is it?
  (Mr Bender) That is happening now. As far as I am concerned, I do not know again a precise answer of where we are on that but that is the sort of issue I want to discuss. What is our skills base? How do we improve our present crop of talent by developing them outside the Department and what skills do we need to import? Your session this morning on the Paying Agency raises an interesting question about whether we need to bring new skills in to help us develop that.

  144. And there are a whole range of dates in this, are there not?
  (Mr Bender) Yes.

  145. Some this year, some next year; and could I perhaps simplify this finally if I may ask Mr Bender do you see this as an important set of objectives which merit their number?
  (Mr Bender) I see it as crucial and one of my aims in the coming weeks and months will be not only to deliver it but to see what needs building on further.

  146. I look forward to asking you how we progress?
  (Mr Bender) I look forward to it, too, Dr Turner.

  Chairman: I am not sure I believe that.

Mr Marsden

  147. I understand there is a Customer Satisfaction Survey conducted, I presume, just for the RSCs in 1995 and that there is shortly to be another Customer Satisfaction Survey, I again assume just exclusively for the RSC but please correct me if it is otherwise. Is that the case?
  (Mr Bender) I am not conscious of a wider exercise at the moment in MAFF. I think all public services should consult their customers and stakeholders periodically and that is something I will want to look at with the Ministry about whether it should be done more widely.
  (Mr Carden) If I could just add to that, it has been standard practice for our executive agencies for some time. We tend to have Customer Satisfaction Surveys every three years.

  148. My final question is, I know that you have been very keen to say how pleased you were, back on the 1995 survey, how good the results were; over 80 percent of customers were satisfied, so would you care to then say whether you think the next survey will show an improvement on that customer satisfaction.
  (Mr Bender) I would not like to predict that.
  (Mr Carden) I do not know.

  Mr Marsden: Okay. Thank you.

Chairman

  149. Mr Bender, last question. You are facing the AGM, you are the new Chief Executive, your predecessor took early retirement, you have have a tight clash flow situation in your company, you have a lot of non-discretionary areas where, quite frankly, you have to follow events because you really do not have the discretion to determine them. The consequence of that is that where you do have discretion the financial sort of leverage on those become very, very tight and you have a pretty difficult market place. There is a problem out there in the market place, you have to envisage some quite serious restructuring of the business and I am your shareholder and I am just a bit anxious about all this. In one minute, without hesitation, repetition and deviation, what would you like to say in a one minute burst as the new man put in the job to make me think as a shareholder: "I am glad we have appointed him"?
  (Mr Bender) First of all I would want to know what my finance director—in this case the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Chief Secretary—will be allowing me to spend over the next three years and until I know that I cannot be clear. I should know that by the Summer. Second, I will want to ensure within the Ministry a greater clarity of purpose through the new aims and objectives in the next Public Service Agreement and then, coming back to the earlier questions, try and improve our business planning and performance management within that. I will want to roll out across the Ministry tools for evaluating performance and improving it, such as the excellence model, such as the programme of better quality services which has already begun in the Ministry. I will want to look at, improve and measure—coming back to the earlier question—the services the Ministry provides to the various stakeholders whether farmers or indeed taxpayers in terms of value for money and I will also hope, coming in as you put it as chief executive of an organisation whose reputation has taken a bit of a battering in the past few years, fairly or unfairly, that in the course of the period ahead we can help turn that reputation around into the reputation I think the organisation deserves.

  150. Thank you very much. We have a few miscellaneous questions. In fact, what I propose to do is to give you a sheet they are written on and you can reply. It seems to me to be barmy if we have to send a letter to you.
  (Mr Bender) Reply in writing, Chairman?

  151. Reply in writing. I realise there are probably terrible constitutional consequences for what I have just done, but I will live with those.
  (Mr Bender) We will not take advantage of it.

  Chairman: Mr Carden, we wish you well at the DTI. We hope you cross our horizons again in one shape or form. Mr Trevelyan, you also because you have, almost certainly depending on funding coming through, a major restructuring to engineer in the area of your responsibility and Mr Bender, we are happy to see you this time. We would like to emphasise that we do think that the improvements in this are clear and we are pleased that in some respects we had a role in how this has come about. As Mr Carden said, there is fine tuning and judgment to be made, but we think it is a much better document than last year and we wish you luck in your turning the business around, as you say and we look forward to seeing you next time. Thank you very much indeed for this encounter.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 2 August 2000