Select Committee on Agriculture Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 400 - 403)

WEDNESDAY 25 OCTOBER 2000

MR RON GREEN, MR GRAHAM KEATING AND MR KARL TUCKER

  400. You tell me. What are the economics of this? You think the economics would stack up?
  (Mr Green) Yes.

Mr Todd

  401. I take it from Mr Keating's answer that simplistic target setting for volume conversion and consumption does not seem a particularly helpful initiative from the Government. Certainly I have commended exactly the step you have set down which is to examine the supply chain mechanism and look at how one can assist in dealing with shortfalls in both processing and particular forms of supply to respond to market demand. Would you agree with that analysis?
  (Mr Keating) Yes, I would. I think responding to Mr Drew's comment, going forward we believe that we should be able to set organic farming, the farming chain into a position where it is a profitable one. It is a learning curve. It is hard work but the market is such that we should be able to manufacture a pricing policy all the way through the chain where farmers, once they have been helped to convert, it is then on the shoulders more of the processing and retail industry to support that through maintaining a price that is reasonable, a fair return.

Mr Drew

  402. If I can just come back in there. We will have this argument privately about the organic target. Unless you actually set some realistic targets and ratchet them up you are always going to be playing catch up with the market place if the demand, as one presumes, continues to increase?
  (Mr Keating) Yes. I think some target setting is required because we have no plans but, arbitrarily, the 30 per cent that has been called for, I am not sure whether that is right. In turn we believe that 10 per cent of dairy manufacture is attainable within the year 2005. The thing target setting does do is it makes you then do that exercise and say "Well where will the shortfalls be?" If you do not start with a target and say "Where will the shortfalls be now" by the time you realise there is a shortfall it is three years to convert your farm to actually fill that shortfall.

Chairman

  403. That is an issue which you will realise has not commanded consensus on this Committee. I have no intention of going into that particular debate at the moment. Thank you very much indeed. Is there any point you wish to make which you wish you had made, have not made or want to correct, very rapidly, before we move to the retailers?
  (Mr Tucker) We believe the appropriate level of government support has the ability for UK domestic suppliers to meet the organic demand from its consumers and can also benefit the United Kingdom PLC on a much wider scale through the whole organic and farming area.

  Chairman: The word "appropriate" is one of the most beloved words of government. It always replaces the word you ought to be using. Thank you for coming. You can go and have a coffee, but if you want to listen to the retailers you are very welcome to sit there and stare at their backs. Would the retailers like to come up?





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 23 November 2000