New Year's Eve
27. NMEC's performance will be judged over the whole
of the operating period. However, the tone for the year may be
set and further interest may be stimulated by the Dome Opening
Celebration on 31 December 1999. In our previous Report, we considered
three outstanding issues relating to the event: the attendance
of members of the public; the spiritual dimension; and broadcasting.[73]
Progress appears to have been made in all three areas.
28. First, NMEC has made clear that the Opening Celebration
will be a family occasion and that the majority of the invited
guests will be drawn from the general public. Nominations have
been sought and competitions have been run by the media and by
sponsors.[74]
Second, agreement has been reached that Christian prayer, led
by the Archbishop of Canterbury, should form a prominent part
of the Opening Celebration, as will the Millennium Resolution,
a short text prepared by Churches Together in England as part
of plans to encourage the whole nation to join in a shared moment
of national reflection on New Year's Eve 1999.[75]
Third, broadcasting arrangements are likely to be established
which ensure that the event is available very widely to television
audiences.[76]
It is estimated that there may be up to 2 billion viewers worldwide.[77]
29. NMEC is also responsible for some arrangements
for New Year's Eve celebrations in London, organising events on
the Thames and along its banks known collectively as "Big
Time". The aim is "to ensure that London enjoys a safe
but exciting, entertaining and inclusive evening".[78]
"Big Time" will include a "Wall of Fire" moving
along the river at a pace equivalent to the speed of sound.[79]
The events are designed to ensure, in Mr Hill's words, that the
riverside is "the place to be" in London on New Year's
Eve.[80]
30. An event of this scale will pose a considerable
challenge for the emergency services. The Metropolitan Police
thought that "New Year's Eve is likely to represent the largest
policing operation in London for at least a decade".[81]
The Metropolitan Police evidence suggests that detailed contingency
planning is being undertaken.[82]
Lord Falconer was "completely satisfied that we have prepared
ourselves, as much as any Government and emergency services possibly
could, for any contingency that may strike on 31 December".[83]
We trust that Lord Falconer's confidence will be justified.
31. Although it is right that, in making preparations
for New Year's Eve, the accent should, first and foremost, be
on safety, we were disappointed to learn that, for "safety
reasons", the Fair on the Mall, which forms part of "Big
Time", may have to wind down as early as 2.00 am to 2.30
am.[84]
We believe that this is a blinkered attitude towards what may
be the biggest communal celebration this country has ever seen.
Lord Falconer signalled a willingness to renew discussions with
the emergency services on the time at which events finish.[85]
We recommend that further consideration be given to the closing
time for publicly organised events during "Big Time"
as a matter of urgency. We expect to receive a report on the outcome
of the consideration in early December.
Conclusions
32. Now is not the time for this Committee to make
judgements on the content and operations of the Millennium Experience.
We have received briefings on progress in recruiting staff and
on other operational matters and have seen the content take shape
inside the Dome, but it is too soon to assess the outcome of NMEC's
efforts. Such an assessment will be possible only once paying
visitors start to arrive. Lord Falconer said that there would
be some testing of zones in December,[86]
but by that time it will be too late to make significant changes.
As Lord Falconer noted, "In large measure we have had to
back our judgement in relation to what the zones are going to
be like and the extent to which they will appeal".[87]
54 HC (1997-98) 340-I, para 1. Back
55 Evidence,
p 19. Back
56 Evidence,
pp 19, 24. Back
57 Evidence,
p 19. Back
58 QQ
90-92. Back
59 Evidence,
p 63; Q 95. Back
60 Q
165. Back
61 Evidence,
p 20. Back
62 Evidence,
p 19. Back
63 Q
120. Back
64 Evidence,
p 20. Back
65 Q
120; Evidence, p 20. Back
66 Evidence,
pp 22-23. Back
67 Q
93. Back
68 Q
93. Back
69 Q
94. Back
70 Evidence,
pp 22, 24, 53. Back
71 Evidence,
pp 24-25; Q 101. Back
72 Evidence,
pp 24-26, 52-53; Q 83. Back
73 HC
(1998-99) 21-I, paras 69-71. Back
74 Evidence,
p 24. Back
75 Evidence,
p 63. Back
76 QQ
115-116. Back
77 Q
115. Back
78 Evidence,
p 26. Back
79 Q
83. Back
80 QQ
74-75. Back
81 Evidence,
p 55. Back
82 Evidence,
pp 55-62. Back
83 Q
155. Back
84 QQ
111-113, 143. Back
85 Q
143. Back
86 Q
153. Back
87 Ibid. Back